I presumed it is the way you position your element because on my mac in
Netscape 7. and IE 5. The logo, the image and the menu are not position
the same way. Try to take off the position relative for the #mainmenu and
if there is still a problem change the position for #menuList to
absolute, in
Lori Leach wrote:
I have a CSS Drop Menu navigation on the following page - I can see
it in FF but not in IE.
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/client-files/gu/
IE/win need a HasLayout hack.
@media all {
* html mainMenu {height: 0;}
}
... at the end of your stylesheet, will bring the menu up on
Berry,
Thank you - that did get it to appear - now, however the submenus are not
showing up in the right areas in IE (pc).
Did that removal of relative get the positioning right on the Mac?
Lori Leach
ZenfulCreations
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/
Georg,
I added that to the bottom, and the menu is appearing at the top now, but my
submenus are wrong in IE.
Thanks so much for looking and your help...
Lori Leach
ZenfulCreations
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
I would love some feedback on a User Preference Script
http://www.csscreator.com/generator/userpref.php
Reports of support from Mac browser and early IE would be especially
useful to me at the moment.
Please provide responses Off List unless you think others would benefit
from it in
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:34:58 +1000, Tony Aslett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would love some feedback on a User Preference Script
http://www.csscreator.com/generator/userpref.php
Because Opera is not able to modify stylesheet rules,
I've been looking for a different solution, and I found one -
Can anyone clarify?
Me not :) However I'd use construction like
...
h1 id=tocTable of contents/h1
...
and you're done.
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/
multiple media attrib values are to be seperated by a comma _only_
Huh, thanks for the info, never noticed it.
(Alhough I don't put the space there, just surprised with it)
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ |
Empty link elements are not good (as Patrick pointed out)but what about
named anchors (destination anchors)?
They are obsolete. Refer to any id instead.
Is there any reason why they should not be empty?
I wouldn't be surprised if it was because of a bug in Netscape4.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
Lori Leach wrote:
Georg,
I added that to the bottom, and the menu is appearing at the top now,
but my submenus are wrong in IE.
Just continue, using this...
ul li.menubar {position: relative;}
...which will put the submenus in the right place.
If IE/Mac don't like this (as I can't test that one
perfectly safe, no scrollbars, and indeed you don't even need the
span element. just set the text-indent on the a, and the text will
be offscreen, with the background image still in place.
That's nice, however ...
I've never gotten that technique to work properly in Opera. It always either
a)
Focas, Grant wrote:
Empty link elements are not good (as Patrick pointed out)but what
about named anchors (destination anchors)? Is there any reason why
they should not be empty?
I'm typically using anchors like this one:
a id=item_1 name=item_1/a, and can't see the need to fill them.
As Kornel
Hi Kornel,
That looks very similar to something I saw not long ago at alistapart.
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/bodyswitchers/
It's a fine solution, but you still need to pre-define each rule in a
stylesheet and there will be browser that don't support the technique.
Tony.
Kornel Lesinski
Hello WSG folks,
Further to Carmelyne's post I am also having trouble placing link text
over the top of background graphics. I used Patrick's solution of
adding span tags on the links but was wondering if there was another
way which is even cleaner. Or am I trying too hard and is the add span
Further to Carmelyne's post I am also having trouble placing link text
over the top of background graphics.Surely there must be a way of using
CSS to position the text?
Yes, there is a simple way: use padding.
See http://browsehappy.pl (note: .pl) - heading gfx is just h1
and text is positioned
Andreas Boehmer wrote:
If you look in IE/PC at http://dev.rmittestlab.com/ you will notice that
there is a little blue space under the Services heading.
You are experiencing The IE Three Pixel Text-Jog described in
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/threepxtest.html
The floating
From: JohnyB
[...]
Actually... Why the hell do we need to do this? :( Screen
readers should
only stick with the aural styles and not the screen ones (not
ignoring
elements, that are not to be displayed) so only display: none
in screen
style would do the work :'( ...
Just like with
Title: Message
I have been writing
html code for awhile now and and starting to realize how inaccessible and
non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand written code in Edit Plus 2,
is there a better editor I can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? )
and where should I
Just like with browsers, what screenreaders *should* do is not
always the same as what they *actually* do in practice.
I know, I know... I just needed to vent it :(
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ |
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:05:03 -0330, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize
how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand
written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web
standards (
I think I may make one for my site later.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:47:45 +1000, Tony Aslett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kornel,
That looks very similar to something I saw not long ago at alistapart.
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/bodyswitchers/
It's a fine solution, but you still need to
I don't like IE, that's why I really don't care if my site's look good
in it. But the fact is that people still use IE, and there is a lot
of them, so you have to design for that too, even though my sites all
look much better is Firefox.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:03:45 +1000 (EST), Rob Unsworth
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? )
Eh, I won't suggest it to beginner - skilled coder knows all the
gotchas, but beginner may just stuck with the WYSIWYG and do it badly.
Everebody in our workshop works with PSPad on almost everything.
If you want to try WYSIWYG I'd suggest trying NVU...
and
Hi,
Here's a bit of what I've learned jumping from editor to editor.
1) Don't pay for and editor, unless your filthy rich or can freeload one
off a company you work for. There are free alternatives that are at
least as good as the one's you pay for.
2) WYSIWYG (point and click) is pure evil.
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize
how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand
written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:05:03 -0330, Paul wrote:
is there a better editor I can use for web
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for tips on
accessibility and standards compliance.
Rather than changing editors, or at least, rather than going to DW! :),
I'd suggest you
Hi,
I've built a couple of websites and each time I come up with the ominous
problem of using div's as columns. The simplest solution and the one
I've found all over the web is to use floats like so:
___
| | | |
| |
Thanks for the help. I realize it is I who has been writing the bad code
and want to get away from it, I guess I am having a hard time getting
around the idea of replacing tables with div tags or is that really
necessary? As an example, if you want one, take a look at this page
True, provided your editor isn't WYSIWYG.
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to
realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have
always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I
can use for web
Wow,wow,wow slow down Alan,
...
Alan Trick wrote:
1) TSW Webcoder: Not bad for newbies. It requires regristration to
get rid of the popup things which is anoying. It is basically for
HTML/CSS coding only. It has no support for server-side scripting
like PHP or ASP besides serverside
I've built a couple of websites and each time I come up with
the ominous
problem of using div's as columns. The simplest solution
and the one
I've found all over the web is to use floats like so:
SNIP
The problem is that the containing block, usually another div
does not
div
id="container"
div id="left"/div
div
id="right"/div
br
style="clear:both;" / - Is what I use. It
does validate but I'm sure theres other ways you can use too.
/div
--
Carmelyne Thompson
Web Architect/Developer
Alan Trick wrote:
Hi,
I've built a couple of websites and each time I
Alan Trick wrote:
The problem is that the containing block, usually another div does not
resise to fit the length of the right and left blocks because they are
floated. So you get things like this:
___
| | | |
| |
Georg,
Thank you so much - that did fix it! I am in awe of your knowledge, and
cannot thank you enough for your time.
Lori Leach
ZenfulCreations
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Gunlaug Sørtun
Sent:
Hi,
At the following url would someone suggest additional accessibility
features for an audience with varying physical and emotional
disabilities. My concern is that the current features will not be as
flexible as desired.
CK
__
Knowing is not enough, you must
I've been reading the member's reviews of editors in the thread Help -
newbie. Upon this subject I am interested to know if any of you have
used CSSEdit from http://www.macrabbit.com/cssedit/
I am considering a new editor and am asking for reviews, pros cons of
this program.
Does it have
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize
how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand
written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web
standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to
realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have
always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I
can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I
start for
Tony Aslett wrote:
Hi All,
I would love some feedback on a User Preference Script
http://www.csscreator.com/generator/userpref.php
Reports of support from Mac browser and early IE would be especially
useful to me at the moment.
Please provide responses Off List unless you think others would
What URI? ;)
--
-David R
Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
At the following url would someone suggest additional accessibility
features for an audience with varying physical and emotional
disabilities. My concern is that the current features will not be as
flexible as desired.
CK
Personally, I don't see the point in JavaScript-powered style switchers
when Server-Side works better...
Client-side switcher has immediate effect, so it's easier to choose style
IMHO.
Besides that, there is no real difference.
Current browsers' built-in style switcher implementations are
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:19:14 -0800, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
At the following url would someone suggest additional accessibility
features for an audience with varying physical and emotional
disabilities. My concern is that the current features will not be as
flexible as
Hi,
There is no problem in netscape 7.0 on mac but for IE 5 the Featured Item
column is still under the image.
I will try to look at it and see what is wrong, and I will come back later.
For the Pc the submenu are wrong because it have an absolute position
(.menu class)
If you change the left
Kornel Lesinski wrote:
I've been looking for a different solution, and I found one -
use multiple classes on body:
body class=smallfont verdana red
Although, if I understand you correctly, that class attribute will be
written out server side on request, based on user choices, it may still
be
along those lines, I wonder if class names such as this would in fact
be correct if all they were doing is adding a visual style (not really
tied to conveying the information, rather to control how pretty it
is)?
i suppose this would be similar to my occasional use of an empty div
(usually named
Hi everybody.
@Tom:
I looked at it in IE 6, FF 1.0, Moz 1.7.5 and Opera 7 on WinME, it looks
the same everywhere, can't see any difference.
Lothar
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.0 - Release Date: 17.01.2005
Chris Kennon wrote:
emotional disabilities.
I may be cold-hearted, but I don't consider myself disabled. ;)
I'm sure you meant cognitive disabilities / learning difficulties / etc
--
Patrick H. Lauke
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used
Chris Kennon wrote:
At the following url would someone suggest additional accessibility
features for an audience with varying physical and emotional
disabilities. My concern is that the current features will not be as
flexible as desired.
http://working.ckimedia.com/questionWar/index.htm
One
Aha! I will give it a try. I just couldn't find a solution for it. Thanks,
man.
The design of this page was so full of little details that it ended up being
quite a mix of css and DIVs. I'll follow your recommendation on the
float:right as well.
Cheers.
-Original Message-
From: IChao
So you see the '4 little squares' image to the left of the One Park
Place head??
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
mlinc.com
On Jan 19, 2005, at 2:40 PM, Lothar B. Baier wrote:
I looked at it in IE 6, FF 1.0, Moz 1.7.5 and Opera 7 on WinME, it
looks
I have always recommended not using an editor, learn it manually, then
perhaps use one for shortcuts. Reliance on html editors and such isn't a
good idea. That will go a long way toward learning on your own, without
being limited by some software. Notetab or notepad is fine.
Bruce Prochnau
I was just at dreamweaver website. Templates. No doctype, tables,
imagemaps and javascript. God forbid. Randomly choosing four of them and
viewing source showed me quite enough. Lets go backwards??? Font face
font size the whole works of what we are trying to get rid of. Someone
new would be
Thanks for both replies. Your jargon is accurate.
Sorry if this constitutes list noise.
On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
I'm sure you meant cognitive disabilities / learning difficulties / etc
CK
__
Knowing is not enough, you must
Bruce wrote:
I was just at dreamweaver website. Templates. No doctype, tables,
imagemaps and javascript. God forbid. Randomly choosing four of them and
viewing source showed me quite enough. Lets go backwards??? Font face
font size the whole works of what we are trying to get rid of. Someone
Title: Re: [WSG] empty named anchors
One reason why you might not want to have content inside of an
anchor would be because of the implementation of stylesheets (or more
accurately how style rules have been specified).
For example if a hover rule is written for to the a
element it will be
On 20 Jan 2005, at 4:19 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
additional accessibility features for an audience with ... emotional
disabilities
Accessibility for the emotionally disabled? A new direction for WS?
What's next - accessibility for the mildly schizophrenic? Additional
features for chronic
On 1/19/05 3:55 PM, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have always recommended not using an editor, learn it manually, then
perhaps use one for shortcuts. Reliance on html editors and such isn't a
good idea. That will go a long way toward learning on your own, without
being limited by some
Hi.
We are releasing next saturday, the new interface based in webstandards
to biggest car seller website of brazil south region and the second of
country.
I would appreciate all comments and suggestions about interface, design
and usability standards.
The temporary address is:
Andreas Boehmer wrote:
If you look in IE/PC at http://dev.rmittestlab.com/ you will notice that
there is a little blue space under the Services heading.
You are experiencing The IE Three Pixel Text-Jog described in
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/threepxtest.html
I have
I'm pushing transparency to IE this way:
#logo {
background: url('img/logo.png') no-repeat;
}
* html #logo {
background: none;
filter:
progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src='img/logo.png',sizingMe
thod='scale');
}
Does this really work on IE? Can I really use
Hi,
Perhaps the lingo below is more succinct.
cognitive disabilities / learning difficulties / etc
On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, at 01:52 PM, Nick Gleitzman wrote:
On 20 Jan 2005, at 4:19 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
additional accessibility features for an audience with ... emotional
disabilities
On 20 Jan 2005, at 8:16 AM, Genau Junior wrote:
I would appreciate all comments and suggestions about interface,
design and usability standards.
The temporary address is:
http://meucarronovo.locaweb.com.br
Images in Noticias section are not loading - they're missing a leading
slash in the
Genau Junior wrote:
I would appreciate all comments and suggestions about interface,
design and usability standards.
The temporary address is: http://meucarronovo.locaweb.com.br
Hmmm, give it one click of font-resizing in Firefox, and it lines up
nicely down the page. One more clearer would help
Does this really work on IE? Can I really use transparency in my PNG-24 and
have IE display it? Or is there some hidden catch?
It is used so here: http://dev.alphanumeric.cz/webspace -- there are
some gotchas, like making the whole block transparent, so it's not to
possible to click on it if
Hi everyone
I have a large site full of mixed case file names with lots of broken links
as most of the links are referring to lower case. Also we are running a
Linux web server which is case sensitive so naturally most of the site is
broken.
Question - is there any program or a way of
Does this really work on IE? Can I really use transparency in my PNG-24
and
have IE display it? Or is there some hidden catch?
There are several catches.
http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/notes/#PNG
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
The discussion list
On 20 Jan 2005, at 10:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question - is there any program or a way of converting all the file
names
to lower case without doing it manually?
BBEdit on Mac has case sensitive, sitewide search replace, and a
powerful pattern-matching tool within search using grep.
Andreas Boehmer wrote:
If you look in IE/PC at http://dev.rmittestlab.com/ you will
notice that
there is a little blue space under the Services heading.
You are experiencing The IE Three Pixel Text-Jog described in
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/threepxtest.html
On 1/19/05 6:42 PM, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this really work on IE? Can I really use transparency in my PNG-24
and
have IE display it? Or is there some hidden catch?
There are several catches.
http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/notes/#PNG
Okay, this is a logo with some
Hi,
I must be missing something here because I just don't get the concept
of using background images as links. Could someone please explain?
--
Eunice
If you want to know what a man's like, take a good look at how he
treats his inferiors, not his equals. - Sirius Black
What I was talking about and I think some other were too was being able to
have a href link attached to an image that is a background image,
particularly for banner images, so that they can link back to the home page
for instance.
Normally you can put a link right onto an image, but the question
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:25:55 +1000, Andrew Krespanis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never gotten that technique to work properly in Opera. It always either
a) makes scrollbars
b) displays some of the text despite insane negative text-indent values...
curious. in Opera 7.54, Firefox 1.0 and IE
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 18:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question - is there any program or a way of converting all the file names
to lower case without doing it manually?
I usually use perl to solve such problems. Place the following script in
a directory and run it; all of the filenames in
As far as I understand, a background image means just that, a image
in the background. If something needs to be a link, I believe it
should be in the foreground. Am I being too strict and literal?
Helen wrote:
What I was talking about and I think some other were too was being able to
have a
Lovely, thanks - I will definitely keep this handy.
Now is there any way of making sure all the href urls in the site are in
lower case too? I use DW (please don't cringe) and normally when you make
a change it updates all the links. Some of the links are mixed case that
is why I need to do
Helen wrote:
What I was talking about and I think some other were too was being able to
have a href link attached to an image that is a background image,
particularly for banner images, so that they can link back to the home page
for instance.
Normally you can put a link right onto an image, but
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:41:40 +1000, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rather than changing editors, or at least, rather than going to DW! :),
I'd suggest you just start validating your pages.
Figuring out those fixes will teach you a lot, and from there you can
move on to Accessibility
Thanks Mike... that sounds like the best and most accessible solution I
have seen so far.
***
Helen Rysavy
Web Designer, Teaching Learning Development
Charles Darwin University, Northern Territory 0909
Tel: 8946 7779 Mobile: 0403 290 842
mailto:[EMAIL
Sorry, Tom,
you are right, the 4squares isn't visible in IE6. (Was to close to
lunch, when I had a look first.)
I had a close look at markup and css, but don't have any idea, what is
the reason for that bug in IE. All other UA are fine.
Lothar
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Chris Stratford wrote:
Wow,wow,wow slow down Alan,
... snip
I LOVE TSW WebCoder.
Built in FTP is Excellent!
Built in Project Manager - with Status reports, To Do Lists, Full
Project Upload
Built in Server Mapping.
Preview in IE and Mozilla - only for HTML coding, or if your server
mapping...
Paul wrote:
I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to
realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have
always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I
can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I
start for
Hi all,
Are there any good guides around to styling form elements using CSS?
The issue right now is that I want to know how far I can go with
formatting groups of checkboxes without using tables, but I'm sure
I'll have more questions soon...
thanks, bye!
---
Ryan Sabir
82 matches
Mail list logo
