Tested, nice. ^_^
On 8/26/07, Joyce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to validate my XHTML at one W3C URL, and then there was another
URL where I validated my CSS style sheet(s). It seems this has been
combined so that I can now validate both my CSS style sheet and my XHTML
markup at
Hi,
When I go to the link you give, I read below the input form the following
statement:
Note: If you want to validate your CSS style sheet embedded in an (X)HTML
document, you should first check that the (X)HTML you use is valid.
which links to the Markup Validator.
To me this implies:
it
Do you mean something like:
.selectlist {
color: #00;
font: 1.1em bold Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
background-color: #cc;
}
with,
select name=options class=selectlist ...
where changing the font-height also changes the height of the select menu
I don't think this can be done. Some browsers (IE, Safari,
Camino, ...) use system default form fields and therefore ignore css
rules applied to them.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Css validator does not validate html. Maybe you got confused by the
fact that you can enter a link to an html file. All it does is, it
checks that html file for any css (inline or external) and validates
the css. And if I recall correctly, this feature has been around for
a while.
As
Yes exacly, I'm trying to avoid a higher select size
while the option value are in upper case letters.
While googling again, doesn't seem possible as Dusan
told. Like similar issues with Mac OS browsers. Anyway
I may try with line-height
--- Stuart Foulstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :
Do
I will be out of the office starting 27/08/2007 and will not return until
02/10/2007.
Please contact Brendan Eve on 6217 9489
__
Important: This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee and
may contain
Thanks to you and Stuart.
Joyce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dusan Smolnikar
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 4:55 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] W3C CSS Validation Service
Css validator does not validate html.
I do not know if this is off topic. If it is please excuse me. I have the
web developer toolbar that works with Firefox upto 1.5 and when I try to
upgrade for my Firefox 2.x, I get an error. Is their a web developer toolbar
for Fire fox 2.x? If so, where can I download it? Thank you.
--
Hi all,
my first post, so: I'm Paul Minty, I do the IA, project management, some
front-end development and even a little copywriting for a small web
design and development studio in Melbourne.
Does anyone know of an effort to define micro-formats using an XML name
space and an XLST? I think
Hi Paul,
Good question.
I am working currently on tesco.com and this is one of the ongoing debates
we have, inside W3C as well, as XSLT is used all over the place and we are
trying to achieve maximum accessibility and so on.
I am not aware that something 'standardised' exists on this matter as
Hey all,
I'm investigating improving our current method of reporting our web
traffic - we currently use server logs only (with an annual community
survey for good measure).
I'm looking for a Javascript page-tagging solution, that is
unobtrusive (keeping in line with our current progressive
Hey Paul,
I'm not 100% sure what you mean by defining microformats as an xml
namespace, but I do know that the microformats community uses the x2v
stylesheets as the reference implementation for many microformats, including
hcalendar and hcard. http://suda.co.uk/projects/X2V/
That's about as
One more thing:
the microformats mailing list
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss/
Is just as friendly and open as this one, just as easy to join, but has the
added advantage that it's full of experts on microformats.
-Breton
Have you looked at Google Analytics?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:52:44 +1000, Paul Hempsall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I'm investigating improving our current method of reporting our web
traffic - we currently use server logs only (with an annual community
survey for good measure).
I'm
Try this:
http://www.google.com/analytics/
Hope its good.
Regards,
Jason
www.flexewebs.com
On 8/27/07, Paul Hempsall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I'm investigating improving our current method of reporting our web
traffic - we currently use server logs only (with an annual
Paul Hempsall wrote:
I'm investigating improving our current method of reporting our web
traffic - we currently use server logs only (with an annual community
survey for good measure).
You haven't really defined your probem...what exactly is it that you're
trying to improve? I'm assuming
Paul,
We use Google Analytics in-house and it is a good addition to log file
analysis.
'Mint' is another tagging-based stats package that should be OK on a
standards-based website http://haveamint.com/
You do get a lot more info on browsers and viewport size throygh the
tagging stats approach.
Jason,
good feedback. For that kind of case I would define an XML namespace
that is specific for your project; process the client's data according
to that model; then transform the XML namespace into XHTML during the
front-end development and content production phase of the project. I
agree with
Thanks for the responses and suggestions.
I haven't checked out Google Analytics yet, although it was on my list.
In fact I'm heading down to Sydney in Sept for some training on it's use
and how to best implement it.
Patrick, reports based on server log files are considerably limiting.
For
Hi Paul,
I'm heading down to Sydney in Sept for some training on it's use
and how to best implement it.
Please tell me your not paying for that.
About Google Analytics
http://www.google.com/support/googleanalytics/bin/topic.py?topic=10977
Installing the tracking code
21 matches
Mail list logo
