Interesting )
2011/4/20 Carl Heaton c...@webcoursesbangkok.com
HI Everyone,
I was just chatting with some of my instructors and I think it would be of
semantic value to have a cpc or advertising tag so that paid adverts can
be taken out of the documents semantic value.
Thoughts?
C
--
I think, it's doesn't work but h2 is not a first child element in
parent element (div).
div
pThis is the first child/p!-- first child element --
h2First header/h2!-- second child element--
pA paragraph/p
h2Second header/h2
pA paragraph/p
/div
2011/3/10 tee
Try frameBorder=0. Can you send out a screencap?
anthony
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:46 AM, designer
desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.ukwrote:
I am having a problem with iframes in html5. I am trying to put a facebook
'like' link on a website and the results are not always as expected
.
Anthony
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM, designer
desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.ukwrote:
Thanks to all who responded, but I should perhaps point out that
'frameborder' is not supported in html5. Also, let me stress : the code
validates fine, and works fine - except IE7 and 8. IE6 is OK.
I just
Hi. I think, this example will help you:
!--[if gte IE 6]!--
link rel=stylesheet href=style.css
!--![endif]--
Best,
Anton
2010/12/18 tee weblis...@gmail.com:
I am finally to begin to stop supporting IE6 starts from 2011 as the usage
has fallen below 5%. I don't want the IE6 users to see a
Sorry :)
!--[if gt IE 6]!--
...
of course.
Best,
Anton.
2010/12/18 Anthony Gr. ant.grak...@gmail.com:
Hi. I think, this example will help you:
!--[if gte IE 6]!--
link rel=stylesheet href=style.css
!--![endif]--
Best,
Anton
2010/12/18 tee weblis...@gmail.com:
I am finally to begin
Hello,
Thank you for your email. I am out of the office from Thursday 21 Jamuary
until Wednesday 27 January.
I apologise for any inconvenience and will endeavour to get back to you as
soon as possible.
Kind regards,
Anthony Earl.
Accessibility Resource Officer
Equality and Diversity Centre
How does onclick become to onClick?
2009/10/14 designer desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk:
Can anyone help me with what is a basic question please?
I have a library item (in Dreamweaver) which includes an onclick:
a href=# onclick=window.print();return false . . . etc
When the library
If you use a tool such as tidy html in xhtml mode it
will delete your empty tags... probably a setting to turn that feature
off, but something to think about...
Cheers,
Anthony.
Gerard Hynes (Gmail) wrote:
My advice below. Cheers, Gerard
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Ben Lau bensan
_javascript_ should be implemented only to supplement
/ layer existing functionality. Your site should operate just fine
without it... There are always exceptions to this rule however you
shouldn't let _javascript_ dictate how you code.
Thanks,
Anthony.
Sven Dowideit wrote:
I have JS
browsers no longer have a
market share and leave our visually impaired visitors in the dark?
Someone mentioned using _javascript_ to implement ARIA parameters. This
is a good idea... but just how accessible would that be to a vision
impaired visitor with _javascript_ turned off?
Thanks,
Anthony
Oh, also... there is a requirement for our pages to validate (hence I
can only see JavaScript as a valid option at this point?)
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
On 20/1/09 22:47, Anthony Ziebell wrote:
It's more of a business decision... do we enhance our sites and make
them a whole lot more
.
Thanks,
Anthony.
james.duc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, I made a typo. Coffee time.
On 1/20/09, james.duc...@gmail.com james.duc...@gmail.com wrote:
after all it's impossible to tell those users using an accessibility aid
like a screen reader
from those who do not, and hey
My only concern with a draft is that things change...
Chris Knowles wrote:
Anthony Ziebell wrote:
ARIA looks good, looking forward to it getting out of draft status.
I wouldn't be waiting for ARIA to get out of draft before using it :) It
has pretty good support
Is it true XHTML 1.1 supports modularization and thus, ARIA, except for
the role attribute / values? XHTML 1.1 (latest draft) allows XHTML 1.1
to be served as text/html as defined in RFC2854 or application/xhtml+xml
as defined in RFC3236. This is exciting as it looks like we are so close
to
ence:
http://microformats.org/wiki/value-excerption-pattern-brainstorming#parsing_title_from_empty_value_elements
Cheers,
Anthony.
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Ben
Rowe wrote:
Obviously it is a clash of HTML standards VS
accessibility.
Actually, it's a clash of microformat
Yes, until the brainstorm is approved and made
standard. Hopefully soon, to remove the requirement of extra CSS. You
could apply a span.value style, or alternatively add 'hidden' as an
extra class style and apply it to that.
span.value style would probably be sufficient.
Regards,
Anthony
Yes, well thankfully there is a workaround. The ABBR
element and title with machine code is a serious problem so far as
accessibility is concerned.
Regards,
Anthony.
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Anthony
Ziebell wrote:
Yes, until the brainstorm is approved and
made standard. Hopefully soon
reader pick up the fact that the element is now
there and read out this error?
Has anyone been able to cater for this requirement?
Thanks,
Anthony.
***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe
Isn't 'aria-required' a non-standard attribute?
Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
Without using alerts, you could add the warning into the actual
document. But how does a screen reader know the document has changed?
For starters:
that meaningful text can be used for linking.
You can read up on good link architecture here:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/10/importance-of-link-architecture.html
Regards,
Anthony.
Chris Dimmock wrote:
Hi Jens
Actually, using the 'title' attribute in a link does NOT add
that right Microsoft and open source in the same
sentence, I was also surprised) called Oxite. http://visitmix.com/
Oxite is still in beta and is built on the MVC platform which appears to be
a good news story for building .NET web standards compliant websites.
Anthony
-Original Message
See you there. Bring your friends
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 03/12/2008, at 6:19 PM, Michael MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This just arrived in my email:
Event: Sydney Townhall Protest to Stop Internet censorship filtering
What: Protest
Host: http://nocensorship.info ; http
Oh, it's certainly not spam. It's been all over
news, whirlpool, everywhere.
Brett Patterson wrote:
1)
That, I do believe is a crock of shit!
2) If he does anything like that, he will be dead!!!
--and--
3) Anyone who believes in those ideas are fucked up, stupid, and
this I
As I understand it, tests have already been
completed in TAS? I'm not sure how accurate this is, though... as I
have not seen any results.
Andrew Barnett wrote:
This is currently at the stage of the government looking for
expressions of interest from ISP's to set this up for a trial.
I
Remember to use server side validation and you don't
need to worry about rewriting standards :)
Brett Patterson wrote:
I
know that most, if not possible to say all, Web page designers use
_javascript_ for form validation. During a recent poll done by a few
local colleges, 41.2% of the people
Sounds like a death-trap.
Graphics Web Designing, LLC wrote:
I am sorry to ask this question but I am very curious as to how others feel about this.
I have a client that is purchasing E-mail listings from a company called expedia mail and I
Was called and asked for my server's root
and there is nothing negative about prototype?
Anyway I only respond again because I don't like to be miss-
represented. If you still feel I am wrong and disprove of the wiki
articles stating it is prototype-based, you really should edit them as
it must be a miss-representation of javascript.
Regards,
Anthony
trying to
debunk the notion of javascript being prototype. Not once did I say it
does not have objects. Intact I offered that it does.
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 28/10/2008, at 7:40 AM, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/27 Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My arguement
Hi Kevin,
The list-style-type (I assume that's what you meant) sets the list-item
marker. So giving the anchor a list-style-type wouldn't effect the
list-item.
Cheers,
Anthony.
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
hi,
How come you cant change the list-type from none to circle(or anything
else) on li
Hey Breton,
I think the examples you gave are implemented in the PHP object and are
relatively simple to implement.
Cheers,
Anthony.
Breton Slivka wrote:
It is my understanding that the bulk of those OOP design patterns are
useful to get around the limitations of static languages like C
objects,
I think I understand your point.
Still confuses me though - if someone is object-orientated but is in
essence prototype-based (with regards to object, inheritance, etc), why
is it incorrect to say _javascript_ is prototype-based?
Cheers,
Anthony.
Keryx Web wrote:
Brett
Patterson skrev:
I
Ok, great.
It was my intent to acknowledge some standards / submissions for OO
which inferred classes / native inheritance were needed.
Thanks for your help :)
Cheers,
Anthony.
Keryx Web wrote:
Anthony
Ziebell skrev:
Still confuses me though - if someone is
object-orientated
as objects, and it is of my opinion that _javascript_ is more
prototype than anything else.
Thanks,
Anthony.
Luke Hoggett wrote:
Indeed, as Alan Kay inventor of
Smalltalk and OOP said
"I invented the term
Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind."
chee
as native inheritance?
Thanks,
Anthony.
Breton Slivka wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luke,
Discrediting c++ has nothing to do with the question "Is _javascript_
object-orientated?". With that, and in closing, I would lik
n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototype-based_programming#Criticism
Thanks,
Anthony.
Breton Slivka wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Breton,
There is a difference between the use of object and object-oriented
programming.
Yes you say t
conflict with your argument anyway).
Thanks,
Anthony.
Breton Slivka wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Lets all just agree then, that the first insulin is simply the best, so no
further development in this area is needed. I am going
My sentiments exactly.
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 27/10/2008, at 3:46 PM, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have in fact read your references, not only just now, but again and
again I have read the wikipedia articles on the subject many moons
ago. Frankly I fail to see
Word.
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 24/10/2008, at 11:32 PM, James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The language itself is NOT object-orientated, its proto-type based.
It can be used in an OOP fashion, but this is not true Object
Orientation as it is in languages such as C
Hi Brett,
_javascript_ is commonly referred to as 'object-orientated' but really,
_javascript_ is 'prototype-based'. They do have different meanings, but
have some similarities...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototype
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming
Cheers,
Anthony
arrays. This is why they are not real
objects. Objects and arrays are totally different.
Cheers,
Anthony.
Brett Patterson wrote:
Hi
Anthony,
What about this link? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/_javascript_
Under Features -- Dynamic Programming?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Anthony
Ziebell
Your point's are valid - my only real point here is
that it is more of a prototype-based language, than object.
Thanks,
Anthony.
liorean wrote:
Brett Patterson wrote:
I am in the middle of a conversation with this guy who says that _javascript_
is an object-oriented language. Is he
Sure, that's what an "object" is. But OOP is not
just about an "object". There is a lot more involved.
Don't get me wrong, I am a fan of _javascript_ - but it has faux classes
and objects, and this is why my opinion of _javascript_ is that it is
prototype, not object.
Che
Forgot to clarify one thing: ECMAScript is fully OO
in my opinion, however _javascript_ is not a full implementation of
ECMAScript, unfortunately.
Thanks,
Anthony.
Brett Patterson wrote:
I
didn't see that. :) But as I have read in other areas, _javascript_ is
based on ECMAScript. And Object
A 'superset' of ECMA3 which is not fully compliant.
Right...
liorean wrote:
2008/10/24 Anthony Ziebell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Forgot to clarify one thing: ECMAScript is fully OO in my opinion, however
_javascript_ is not a full implementation of ECMAScript, unfortunately
Whether _javascript_ is OOP is kind of a matter of
taste, rather than definition (Because there is no definition)
Agreed, hence the diverse arguments for / against,
and no way everyone would be able to agree on it. Perhaps we need to
write a standard on OO.
Thanks,
Anthony.
Breton Slivka
Hi Lynette,
The first list has a nested list correctly inside of the list item,
however your subsequent list items end the list item element before the
new nested list begins...
e.g:
lia href=""WEED
SPECIES/a/li
ul id="subnavlist"
li id="subactive"a href=""
Hi Lynette,
I see what you are asking now - this would probably need to be
refactored to have it validate.
Cheers,
Anthony.
Lynette Smith wrote:
Thanks Anthony - I've corrected that - but won't the repetition of
ul id's stop it validating?
The first list has a nested list
That might work - but then I don't know how the menu
scripts work. If they rely on ID's, then you will need to refactor.
Lynette Smith wrote:
I see what you are asking now - this would probably need to be
refactored to have it validate.
Cheers,
Anthony.
Perhaps
,
Anthony
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
It's no wonder students are coming out with such strange ideals. Tell
him WSG says so.
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 26/09/2008, at 10:40 PM, Todd Budnikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's irrelevant according to HTML 4 how you write the tags, so on
one front, your instructor
to not have to worry about IE6 however
I think that day will be a very long day coming.
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 03/09/2008, at 7:05 AM, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Most schools around here don't even allow win2k on their network
anymore.
An interesting
Can't wait to get into the office!!!
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 03/09/2008, at 7:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google chrome is available for windows download !
http://www.google.com/chrome
On Tue 2/09/08 10:18 PM , tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2008, at 5
That was heavily talked about accross most topics already.
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from my iPhone!
On 03/09/2008, at 7:41 AM, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2008, at 2:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google chrome is available for windows download !
http://www.google.com/chrome
First of all try to avoid in-line scripting. You could make great use
of jquery, mootools or any other library.
Make sure to provide an alternative method (buttons, links, etc) to
make things accessible for javascript disabled browsers, screen
readers, etc.
Regards,
Anthony.
Sent from
Naveen,
You are probably better off searching for a language specific standards
group - I'm sure some people can help you here, but most of the
questions posted to this list appear to be web related.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Where can Iearn more about desktop
trying to do?
Sounds a bit odd to display a table cell as a block tbh.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Anthony Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried Google and the archives but no luck
I have an issue with IE not applying display:block to table elements: tr,
td, tr etc
--
Anthony Green
I've tried Google and the archives but no luck
I have an issue with IE not applying display:block to table elements: tr,
td, tr etc
Anyone see this before and know a work around ?
Tony
***
List Guidelines:
Does anyone have any guides to developing standards based/accessible web
applications like Basecamp ?
For example a common pattern for website navigation is the tab list of links
ul
lia href ...Cats/li
lia href ...Dogs/li
lia href ...Mice/li
/ul
However web applications often copy the
Due to the volume of Spam around the internet, and in the interests of keeping
the internet as spam-free as possible, unfortunately, the message you sent
requires that you verify that you are a real live human being and not a spam
source.
To complete this verification, simply reply to this
...I've been doing some research and I'm
not finding any real threads on a review of the software.
If you have any info, I'd appreciate it.
--
Sincerely,
Anthony P. Zeoli
Founder
Netmix.com
333 86th Street, Apt 2C
Brooklyn, NY 11209-5051
Tel: 917-705-4700
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http
break, which is whitespace, so anything that
strips it out should replace it as such.
Multiple white space is collapsed (user agents should collapse input
white space sequences when producing output inter-word space) so both
before and after spaces are unnecessary.
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com
as big as 800x600 seems like luxury!
HTML was designed to work as a flexible presentation medium. I hate the
rigidity of making it work like paper :)
Cheers!
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites
**
The discussion list for http
forms). I try to build without it, then
add it once the XHTML/CSS has done all it can.
Cheers!
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
play.
It only works in IE as it needs an ActiveX control. Looks like these fonts
used to be supported in Netscape 4.x but it's no longer supported in
Netscape 6+.
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites
**
The discussion list
Bitstream Vera Sans is nice, and free.
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
http://www.youngpup.net/2001/sleight
I don't remember what the problem was that I had with the behavior for
doing this, but I found this JavaScript and it works fine.
Sadly this doesn't work in Opera 8.
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites
.
Cheers!
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
different things to
IE6 too.
Can't wait for the real IE7, and really hoping it'll conform to CSS as
well as Opera and Firefox etc.
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
, which aren't
allowed in XHTML apart from around tag attribute values.
I think.
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
I suggest you see a sleep-walking specialist, :P
Anyways, If you're curious if you're on a spam list, I suggest you do
a search for your email on some search engines, and usenet groups.
Anthony Yeung
On 5/8/05, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's see! I am told I have spilt personality
***The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list getting help******
-- Anthony TimberlakeCo-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services - http://ww
I believe that he is trying to create the majority of the diagram
using CSS, i.e. all the boxes and connecting lines. Use of graphics
would be limited to only small bmp arrows.
On 4/23/05, Lee Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might be missing something here but If you're allowed to use
This is great news, let's hope that the CSS fixes are as good as they
say they are. I'm definetely looking forward the beta release.
Wouldn't be a strange world if we didn't curse developing for IE?
We'd miss all the fun. :-)
On 4/23/05, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The site looks good, works well with Safari, Mozilla, FireFox,
Netscape, IE, and Opera. Good content layout, and best of all no
tables.
- Anthony
On 4/21/05, Pixel n Paints [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I am freelancer from INDIA... I have designed a website
http://www.mad4f1.com
I must say this site has a very well designed layout and wonderful
structure. I esp. like the Flash implementation.
- Anthony
On 4/21/05, Kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heres a good example of a hybrid site that uses flash for presentation and
css for content as someone had requested
Very nice site presentation and I love the way that everything fits in with the theme. Nice use of standards. Very nice site.
On 4/21/05, Anthony Yeung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The site looks good, works well with Safari, Mozilla, FireFox,Netscape, IE, and Opera. Good content layout, and best
An interesting peiceOn 4/20/05, Paul Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, he probably is right about that , but he's wrong about something
else. My home page uses web standards and it's no
monument to great design. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webpagesthatsuck.com%2F...
If you're using an Apache Server, you can do this via a .htaccess file
Here's how you code it:
Files page1
ForceType application/x-httpd-php
/Files
Replace page1 with the file name of your choice. Save page1 with all
your PHP coding as a file with *no* file name extensions, as Apache
will
You have something wrong with your padding declaratives. Replace it with this:
ul li {list-style-type:none; background: url(bg-bullets.png) no-repeat
0 5px; padding:12px;}
Once you apply full padding around the entire image, everything should
work properly.
- Anthony
On 4/20/05, Drake, Ted C
://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Co-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services - http://www.statichost.co.uk
Head Director at Spike Radio - http
://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list getting help**-- Anthony TimberlakeCo-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services - http://www.statichost.co.ukHead Director at Spike Radio - http://www.spikeradio.org
getting help
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Head Director at Spike Radio
http://www.spikeradio.org
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org
getting help
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Co-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
http://www.spikeradio.org
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Co-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
http://www.spikeradio.org
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
I got a MYSQL error yesterday, I am not sure if you want to check
this. I also don't know if it has been reported yet...
--
Anthony Timberlake
Co-Owner of StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
http://www.spikeradio.org
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
http://www.spikeradio.org
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
But at least it looks like they were. It is better than that crowded
horrible page that they used to have.
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:55:56 +0100, Raffaella Biscuso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Timberlake Scrive:
I like it, but it leaves room to improve. They are a large company
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
http://www.spikeradio.org
/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
http://www.spikeradio.org
.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http
://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
http://www.spikeradio.org
/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
http://www.spikeradio.org
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
http://www.spikeradio.org
**
The discussion list
? Conceptual things of that
nature.
Can anyone help with links to a good design theory website or book. Thanks!
--
Sincerely,
Anthony P. Zeoli
Founder
Netmix.com
496 Court Street, Apt 3
Brooklyn, NY 11231
Tel: 718-858-7876
Mob: 917-705-4700
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.netmix.com
AIM MSN
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my
site? Is there anything wrong with it? Thanks for your help.
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
**
The discussion list
The color scheme is what I do not like. Can someone help me find a
better color scheme?
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:46:27 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my
site? Is there anything wrong with it? Thanks for your
I do have one set of head, body and html tags.
I have validated my CSS and HTML.
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:51:36 -0500, Al Sessions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Timberlake wrote:
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What can I do to improve my
site? Is there anything wrong
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
