://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
--
Donna Jones
Portland, Maine
207 772 0266
www.westendwebs.com
--
Donna Jones
Portland, Maine
207 772 0266
www.westendwebs.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
and
give it a class or id. That you'll need someone else to explain to you,
since I know how to borrow code to make this happen but don't fully
understand how it works. ;)
I feel clever enough for now! thanks again!
best
donna
--
Donna Jones
Portland, Maine
207 772 0266
www.westendwebs.com
.
so, ended up trying to fix this but have no clue how to do it.
--
Donna Jones
Portland, Maine
207 772 0266
www.westendwebs.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http
it to prevent the
link being followed.
i suppose i understand what you're saying but i don't know javascript, i
don't know the syntax, so pretty impossible for me to implement.
cheers
donna
--
Donna Jones
Portland, Maine
207 772 0266
www.westendwebs.com
, to see if I could duplicate what you were
talking about and couldn't ...
thanks again.
Donna
--
Donna Jones
Portland, Maine
207 772 0266
www.westendwebs.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
response.
cheers
donna
--
Donna Jones
Portland, Maine
207 772 0266
www.westendwebs.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL
it. is there something i can use instead?
many thanks in advance. :)
Donna
--
Donna Jones
Portland, Maine
207 772 0266
www.westendwebs.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http
, is that i do *so much* stuff
with the keyboard. i can go a long time without touching the mouse and
i do think its better - you're varying your actions much more with the
keyboard.
my two cents,
cheers
donna
--
Donna Jones
Portland, Maine
207 772 0266
www.westendwebs.com
%20Toolsnumpg=10id=402
hu. it doesn't say it will install on Mozilla, but visited with
mozilla and it did - works fine.
does anyone have any opinion as to how accurate it is? other users here?
cheers
Donna
--
Donna Jones
Portland, Maine
207 772 0266
http://www.westendwebs.com
Joshua Street wrote:
Hmm, thanks. Should learn to RTF... website... or something :P
HOWEVER! When I do that, IE6 with XPSP2 gives me security warnings and
blocks it by default... then, it kills my typography (though
positioning and image replacement and backgrounds all stay okay)
whilst doing
Al Sparber wrote:
From: Paul Noone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I've been interested in the whole justified text issue for a
while and
think Joshua raises an interesting point. I don't generally use it to
style
paragraphs because I personally don't like its appearance but I wasn't
aware
Hi Joe, i ck'd it with my standalone IE5.5 and IE5.1 and it showed with
scroll bars and scrolled with the mouse.
donna
Joseph Lindsay wrote:
Hi folks,
I have an issue with IE5.5 (who doesn't?). This page:
http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/no/newsletters/20051118.html displays
without scroll-bars,
okay, hi everyone: a short question, i intend it to be, at least.
is i (italic) deprecated in xhtml? and even better, could someone
point me to a w3c page that talks about what is deprecated in xhtml?
and, second part of that, why does the validator validate it if it is
deprecated.
many
and stay aware of
that.
also, really neat to get clear on the html4.01 specs following through
in to xhtml 1.0.
anyway, thanks again!
Donna
Donna Jones wrote:
okay, hi everyone: a short question, i intend it to be, at least.
is i (italic) deprecated in xhtml? and even better, could someone
Thanks for persuing this, i'm trying to understand, too.
designer wrote:
. . . before I go back to html 2.0!
But seriously, in my continuing quest to understand/get a feeling for mime types
etc, I've made two files now : thearea.html and thearea.xhtml. What I did was
to make the xhtml
Dear CSS Listers:
in another thread, someone essentially asked why code like this, in
trying to convince a friend. I don't think he's getting very good
answers but at any rate, it made me think of a problem I'm having and
I've decided to make a new thread.
A non-profit that i've maintained
Kim Kruse wrote:
I tell my clients that the only way you can measure if your website
(code wise) is any good is by using the industrial standards set by the
W3 and the validators. This also means that if you can't maintain the
site anymore any semi skilled coder should be able to take over.
Terrence and all: thank you for all your replies.
Lea said she thought accessibility was my strongest suit and I agree
with that. At least font-size increase is something that can be seen
on the surface, and perhaps other accessibility issues that I haven't
thought about. I did think today
Peter J. Farrell wrote:
Donna Jones wrote:
... I'm afraid the budget is eaten up by the PR firm and so the NP is
feeling badly that I'm in the position, once again, of donating a
lot of my time. Ideally, in their view, i think, they'd like for me
to say, yes, the PR's code is great
- Creating an xhtml 1.0 document.
- Cleaning out 'human bugs' in HTMLTidy - 'convert to xml'.
- Serving it as 'xhtml' with the extension '.xhtml' to browsers that can
make anything out of it - Opera, Moz/FF, Safari - internally and on line.
Info: application/xhtml+xml - no errors -
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Marco van Hylckama Vlieg wrote:
I'm using the standalone MSIE 5.01 and 5.5 from www.quirksmode.org to
tweak a design for IE5 and 5.5.
Is it just me or don't these versions pick up conditional comments
for various older IE versions?
here is the fix, if you or
So I'm appealing to the list for suggestions on advanced CSS
publications and on-line training.
Respectfully,
Chris
Chris, re on-line training, you might want to check out the courses at
international webmasters association/html writers' guild.
http://www.hwg.org/
i got a wonderful head
Hi Gail. i was just thinking about this last night. After recently
reading Eat Shoots and Leaves i've become more aware of punctuation
and how it aids in the rhythm of words, and phrases, and thus
comprehension. it would seem to me that a colon would help a screen
reader user. and your
/issue44/lauke/
snip
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 23:40 -0400, Donna Jones wrote:
does anyone have an url for this? tried finding it on moz and
couldn't and really would like to try it out.
http://accessibar.mozdev.org/
/snip
ted,
this is an accessibility tool bar; quite different from the web
does anyone have an url for this? tried finding it on moz and couldn't
and really would like to try it out.
tia
Donna
Rick Faaberg wrote:
On 8/23/05 10:25 PM dwain alford [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
i just downloaded the accessibar at the mozdev web site. it's got a
built in
Mugur Padurean wrote:
Hello, reality check here.
Quoting the US and Australian available IT infrastructure, as a good reason
for building huge web pages, is wrong for at least three reasons:
I surely didn't mean to be doing that, please see below.
1. Over 90% percent of the world population
Mugur Padurean wrote:
Hello, reality check here.
Quoting the US and Australian available IT infrastructure, as a good reason
for building huge web pages, is wrong for at least three reasons:
I surely didn't mean to be doing that, please see below.
1. Over 90% percent of the world population
This article only discusses reducing the HTML size. which if you take a look
at the site is already rather anorexic. Loading an image once, caching it
for potentially weeks, and not loading anything other than small HTML pages
as they browse the rest of the site seems like the smartest way it's
Terrence Wood.
On 26 Jul 2005, at 4:30 AM, Donna Jones wrote:
I surely can't tell any difference between the way this site loads and
many of them in cssgardens - in fact, i just found an official one,
and its background is 185K. found another, 100K. another 136K.
most much smaller
Not exactly a clean user experience then. Particularly troublesome when
designers rely on the background image and define colour for their text
to be readable against it, but fail to provide fallback background colour.
Zengarden is an experimental site, showcasing in many cases how one can
hi Bruce: There are some errors in your html that may be causing it.
Validate your code and then see what's happening. if you don't have
firefox installed with its webdev extension you probably should and
that's maybe the easiest way to get to the validator. if you need more
help with that
of hours spent over little
things make one want to give up and use tables or something. Seriously.
Just frustrated I guess...
yes, can relate and probably most of the people on this list have felt
the same way.
Bruce
Donna Jones wrote:
hi Bruce: There are some errors in your html that may
, padding and margins set to 0
Standards are great, and I know there is a learning curve, but when one is
trying to exist and make a living, dozens of hours spent over little
things make one want to give up and use tables or something. Seriously.
Just frustrated I guess...
Bruce
Donna Jones wrote
tee wrote:
The site looks fine under IE6 on my PC. Nice job.
Thanks but are your sure the menu is working??? It obviously doesn't in my
IE 5/6 (both W2K and XP home); hover disappear and links are not clickable.
tee
Hi Tee: I just looked - and the menus aren't working for me. I
The two images work fine and the left
column seems working fine except it doesn't stay where I want it to be,
Tee, I figured this out. Change the width of your #leftColWrapper to
92px, the same as is in your books class. Small consolation though, in
face of the Dean Edwards(IE7) conflicts,
down to money, doesn't it?
regards
Georg
--
Donna Jones
West End Webs http://www.westendwebs.com/ 772-0266
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
it was therapeutic to write
it :)
cheers,
h
--
Donna Jones
West End Webs http://www.westendwebs.com/ 772-0266
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
**
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Donna Jones
West End Webs http
/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Donna Jones
West End Webs http://www.westendwebs.com/ 772-0266
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
.
best wishes and tia,
Donna
ps, this is the most css I've ever done, but am taking a class right now
through iwa.
--
My name is Donna Jones and I approve of this message.
http://www.westendwebs.com/ 772-0266
http://www.portlanddems.org
, if anyone wants to help I won't
be unhappy about that, but I don't expect it.
Take care everyone.
best
Donna
Donna Jones wrote:
Hi everyone: I had signed up for this group some months ago and it was
so over-my-head that I un-subbed when I had to be away a bit and just
re-subbed tonight
to be very chatty but just
thought i'd say a few words and see if i could get that toolbar! :-)
TIA and thanks to the list admin and thanks to all the regular contributors.
warm regards,
Donna Jones
Lee Roberts wrote:
Congratulations to NILS for such a fantastic tool. Your use of the
simulator
/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
*
--
Donna Jones, 772-0266
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
44 matches
Mail list logo
