Bob:
No amount of descriptive prose will
mean anything to to a blind reader.
Vlad:
I've never heard such sh*t in my life.
I've been following this thread with interest, and I have to agree with
Vlad (if not with his exact choice of words...). I was waiting to see
what kind of response
On 10 Sep 2007, at 1:24 AM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Perhaps then you (or anyone adhering to this view) can supply, as
an example, a useful description of the cited Rothko? Or maybe one
of Jackson Pollock's works? ('No. 5, 1948' might be good)
And since art is often intended to prompt an
Hassan Schroeder wrote:
You can get a certain amount of information from a photocopy of a
grilled cheese sandwich, but it makes rather a dry meal :-)
Absolutely. But this whole thread started with the issue of whether alt
text should be optional in HTML5.
A photocopy may be a poor,
Julián Landerreche wrote:
I have tested this in:
- Firefox 2.0.0.6 (both Win and Linux)
Hmm. Not convinced that it's a bug; your line-wrapped link appears as
you want in FF2.0.0.6/Mac OSX - ?
To look at the issue laterally, if your fixed-width table requires that
long links wrap, why
On 23 Aug 2007, at 3:07 AM, David Hucklesby wrote:
After all, if I write about the Sheraton Centre in Manhattan, my
U.S. spell checker tells me I misspelled Centre. So do I change
the spelling? I think not.
Hmm. Interesting example. 'Sheraton Center' is a placename - a proper
noun.
Have
On 11 Aug 2007, at 10:01 AM, Joyce Evans wrote:
When I view the following link (which I’m working on) in IE7, the
lower portion of the “y” in the word “Physician” does not appear. I
see the entire “y” in IE 6 and FF 2 but not in IE7. This text is
sitting within an h1 tag within a #title
On 9 Aug 2007, at 10:38 AM, WebScience Australia wrote:
Please reply with your business name, contact name and hone number,
and the answers to the two questions.
Offlist, of course, as this is waaay OT...
N
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 17 Jul 2007, at 8:40 PM, Nick Roper wrote:
http://dev.logical.co.uk/castlewelding/final/gates_railings.php
The font for the h1 should be Garamond - as it is for the menus at the
left. However it refuses to render in FF/Windows - although it is fine
on FF/Mac. The other weird thing is
Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
2. If I don't include a dreaded hack in my css (which I'd really like
to
remove because my style sheet doesn't validate)
So use a Conditional Comment - ?
N
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 2 Jul 2007, at 3:10 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Paul Collins apparently typed:
I seem to be having trouble assigning the font-size:62.5%
Please note that...
Toldja.
N
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 2 Jul 2007, at 6:09 PM, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
I guess I was hoping to fix the problem(s), rather than just rely on a
hack. Other suggestions appreciated.
Fair enough, but I'd say your chances of getting the one set of css
rules to display correctly in all browsers are pretty slim -
On 30 Jun 2007, at 4:11 PM, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Surely you don't mean that ;-)
On Sat, June 30, 2007 2:49 am, Chris Price wrote:
My thinking was that my real aim is to make the data useful so just
making it valid or logical may not be my prime concern.
Kind Regards
--
Chris Price
On 30 Jun 2007, at 6:07 PM, Chris Price wrote:
I didn't say I would be happy for it to be invalid but poor design
that validates isn't useful.
No, you said, .. so just making it valid or logical may not be my
prime concern. The point is, and the reason Philippe pointed out that
your code
On 30 Jun 2007, at 9:58 AM, Sander Aarts wrote:
So you don't care at all about the cognitively challenged visitors
to your site then?
You're challenging me now as I don't have a clue what your talking
about. How does adding 'skip links' make a site less usable/accessible
for cognitively
On 30 Jun 2007, at 11:34 AM, Sander Aarts wrote:
My 'skip to' menu is like a map of the page and I believe it benefits
more people than it hinders.
Can't argue with belief. If it works for you (but more importantly, for
your visitors), go for it.
But at the risk of presuming to take up
On 28 Jun 2007, at 6:50 PM, Frank Palinkas wrote:
If the global site navigation on a page is marked up below the
content...
Hang on - if your nav is *below* the content, wouldn't the link be
better as 'skip to navigation'?
N
___
omnivision. websight.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...with a paper doc the user always gets to see the front cover.
Unless they're blind.
Thing about markup is, we can structure it for many more purposes than
hard copy info can be. The most important blind visitor? Google...
(Which I think is where this thread
On 28 Jun 2007, at 11:03 PM, Sunday John wrote:
The company logo is the image image and the representative of the
company on the internet. Without the existience of the company the
logo won't exist and without the branding the website wouldn't have
come anyway!
The content should just be
On 28 Jun 2007, at 11:41 PM, Sunday John wrote:
Does a content based site respond to search engine than a well
meta-tag, keyword e.t.c site?
It's pretty much accepted now that meta name=keywords don't carry
nearly as much weight as keywords (= search terms) in the actual
content of a page.
Sander Aarts wrote:
How can you search for a company when you don't know it exists?
How do you find out what goods a certain company sells if don't know
what they are?
Sorry, Sander, but that logic escapes me. Of course I don't know what
goods a certain company sells if I don't know they
On 29 Jun 2007, at 5:44 AM, Sander Aarts wrote:
Nick Gleitzman schreef:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...with a paper doc the user always gets to see the front cover.
Unless they're blind.
Well, they wont be seeing anything else then either, so semantics and
hierarchy of headings doesn't
On 27 Jun 2007, at 6:43 PM, James Jeffery wrote:
H1 should be your company name, or logo.
h1img src= alt=/h1
Some people like to use IR (Image Replacement) for logos, but a logo
is your brand, just as your
name is your brand, so i wouldnt use IR on a logo. Tagline should be
H2.
Im not
On 26 Jun 2007, at 8:45 AM, Olajide Olaolorun wrote:
Can some help me with this problem:
http://www.olajideolaolorun.com/problem.html
Its right when i view it in Firefox, but in IE, its problematic. Can
anyone help me out as to why it is not aligning right?
Firstly, I assume that you mean
On 22 Jun 2007, at 5:41 PM, C. Bergström wrote:
...a clean and valid html way to display tabular data...
...is a table - isn't it?
N
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
***
List
Joyce Evans wrote:
I’m new to this group, and I’m not sure if it’s okay to post a
question, but here it is:
I’ve designed a website and am now creating the CSS for the home
page. This is the CSS for my main container div:
#container {
width: 760px;
On 18 Jun 2007, at 1:18 PM, dwain wrote:
Dale, Tim wrote:
Today, AGIMO released the Web Publishing Guide
this is nice, but do you have anything for the unites states along
this line?
With respect, don't you think that guidelines for the US would better
be written by someone in that
On 13 Jun 2007, at 8:10 PM, SJL wrote:
I have this problem where i want to force download...
I actually want the save as window to appear and give the choice to
the viewer.
Hmm. I've been following this thread, with its discussion of headers,
MIME types and content-disposition, and I
Michael MD wrote:
Speaking of Mac browsers -
a friend called me on the weekend and said he can't find anything
newer than IE5 for OS9 but won't upgrade to OSX because it would be
way too slow on his G3. (and he doesn't have the money to buy a new
machine)
now that is something to think
Nick Roper wrote:
Just to confirm, the recommendation from the agency is to replace
existing html content with PDF version, not to provide PDFs as an
additional alternative.
Nick, you've made it fairly clear that your question is about
accessiblity in PDFs, rather than whether or not it's a
On 6 Jun 2007, at 2:59 PM, John Faulds wrote:
Well if we're going to talk about 'pedanticness' it has to be pointed
out that there's no such word; the word you're looking for is
'pedantry'.
Pedanticity?
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
Raine wrote:
Let me be so bold as to nip this thread in the bud...
Gee, sorry. I just thought, given the intensity that some people
display here, a little levity every now and then helps the medicine go
down - or something... Look what fun we can have:
... often tiresome ... display ...
On 7 Jun 2007, at 8:34 AM, kevin mcmonagle wrote:
Hi can anyone suggest how i might get this definition list to wrap
around
First, and always, validate your code. Your dl doesn't contain a
dt...
N
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 7 Jun 2007, at 2:25 PM, JS Bracher wrote:
Once I realized the problem was a specificity issue, I changed the
internal style block to:
li#index a, li#index a:hover ...
Hopefully you changed the HTML as well, because the sample you
originally posted had the id of 'index' on the a, not
On 5 Jun 2007, at 3:34 PM, Jackie Reid wrote:
The fact the validator passed it also seemed to me to say that it
could be used in this way. If fieldset can't be used this way why
does it pass validation?
Forgot this point: valid doesn't mean correct, or sensible. It's really
easy to write
On 5 Jun 2007, at 6:13 PM, Patrick Lauke wrote:
No need to debate it...w3schools is a cr*ppy resource, full stop.
That's an opinion, which of course you're entitled to (happens that I
agree with you) - but I couldn't resist taking a look. And right there
on their Home page:
W3Schools
Barney Carroll wrote:
...a deceased squirrel foetus
Wow. What an image.
N
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Lucien Stals wrote:
I suspect that the following code...
fieldsetlegendstaff details/legend
dl
dtemail/dtdd[EMAIL PROTECTED]/dd
dtphone/dtdd12345678/dd
/dl
/fieldset
Is perfectly valid, semantic markup which a screen reader would render
just fine.
Logical, no doubt of it. But see Steve
On 5 Jun 2007, at 11:41 AM, Lucien Stals wrote:
...the fieldset itself can contain anything...
Huh? Where in the spec does it say that?!
And why would you want to use something for which it's not intended? It
would surely, at best, be semantically confusing.
Some legacy code I just
On 2 Jun 2007, at 12:29 PM, Katrina wrote:
that position is about to undergo a 360 degree change
tongue-in-cheek
...which will bring it back to where it started...
/tongue-in-cheek
N
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 2 Jun 2007, at 8:06 PM, Designer wrote:
I've used a simple table
Nothing wrong with that, if NN4.x is in your group of target browsers.
But you might like to consider adding a rule to your css so that the
content of the RH column is anchored to the top of the cell - at
present it's
On 3 Jun 2007, at 8:44 AM, Mark Hedley wrote:
...for IE6 and to be fair... who uses it still?!
How about 56% of your audience?!
http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2007/May/browser.php
N
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
Hi folks
Is it just me. or have a whole slew of recent posts been OT?
CMS: there's a CMS list just for you guys. Please use it...
Photoshop and JAWS: sorry, Marvin, but that's just OT for this list.
Can we get back to the on topic issues of Web Standards, perchance?
Check the guidelines - if
Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Assistive technology off topic?
Barney Carroll wrote:
It's worth making the point: Don't get intimidated by this - JAWS is a
perfectly legitimate thing to discuss here.
When it's used to access Photoshop - which in my experience doesn't
have a whole lot to do with
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
I am going to start with the sliding doors 2.0 article on ala.
Does anyone have any advice or examples regarding a sideways tabular
nav bar?
You've got the right starting point - but be aware that (in my previous
experience) IE/Win (of course...) doesn't honour the
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
Thanks nick i might need to implement that js fix. The sliding doors
method, or any that ive seen, only works if all the tabs are the same
colour.
Ah. Of course. I'm sure you could make your design work, but there
would be a lot of classes and/or ids involved to
On 25 May 2007, at 5:18 PM, Taco Fleur wrote:
http://www.clickfind.com.au/test-index.html
I am trying to get the form elements the same height
Hi Taco
Form Submit buttons are system-level widgets - they're different shapes
and sizes according to which browser/OS combination is in use.
On 25 May 2007, at 11:44 AM, Felisimina Jom wrote:
We are trying to put together a map of Australia where the states
appear on hover and are clickable.
As I understand it, the hover state can't be used in area so I
wonder if there is a way to display the States on hover without using
On 25 May 2007, at 1:22 PM, Tim wrote:
So what do you know about change management Nick?
Comment on the research Nick, stick to the issue instead of trying so
pathetically to belt me up.
The page is not intended for you Nick.
Take a bex and have a good lie down.
Tim
Reply made offlist as
On 25 May 2007, at 1:58 PM, Lachlan Hardy wrote:
Reply made offlist as debates of qualifications and recommended
medications are definitely OT.
/* Admin */
Agreed.
This thread is now closed as the majority of content appears to be OT,
and is certainly not conducive to helping
On 23 May 2007, at 7:36 AM, John Faulds wrote:
I doubt there's any laws in Australia that prohibit me having sex with
a wombat - doesn't mean it's something that's OK to do though
Damn.
___
omnivision. websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 20 May 2007, at 10:02 PM, Designer wrote:
div#menu li{
width : 250px;
display : inline;
list-style-type : none;
}
snip
and, of course, the 'width : 250px' is just ignored. I've tried
setting a width on the a but that doesn't work either.
MUST I use a table?
On 20 May 2007, at 10:02 PM, Designer wrote:
Has anyone got a (simple) workaround for the fact that I want to
specify the width of each li in an inline list? (which is not
allowed).
Sorry, previous answer was incomplete.
Not allowed? By whom/what?
Float the lis left, give each one an id
On 16 May 2007, at 7:28 PM, kevin mcmonagle wrote:
What would you have done in this situation?
Find another client - or risk sounding like a whiner yourself. At the
end of the day, you can give clients informed choice, but you can't
*make* them follow your advice. If they can't see the
On 16 May 2007, at 11:28 PM, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
http://www.wizwebz.co.uk ...
http://csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/zen/
sample.css
OK, enough - I quit. How can I possibly compete with these world-class
designers?
N
___
omnivision.
Robby Jennings wrote:
I've found this list of depreciated tags
http://www.html-reference.com/depreciated.htm which lists strong and
em as depreciated. I thought the b tag would be depreciated.
Don't like the look of that page much. Must be old. Very vague, infers
that HTML4.0 is new,
John Horner wrote:
I'm looking at a design involving image thumbnails and the instruction
to click images for larger version -- I have the idea that saying
click is wrong, or rather the assumption that everyone is using a
mouse is wrong.
So, how would you word this instruction, or otherwise
Hi all
I have to incorporate a couple of simple flowcharts into the content of
a site I'm building, I'm scratching my head about the best way to mark
up this info in a semantically meaningful way. A generic example can be
seen here:
http://www.omnivision.com.au/test/flowchart/
I'd be
Gallagher, Robin wrote:
Users of the search engine on my intranet site wold like to have the
results open in a new page. Can anyone suggest a valid method to do
this in xhtml 1.1?
Umm... teach 'em how to use the software? A good browser allows the
choice of a new window - or tab - with a
On 22 Feb 2006, at 9:16 AM, Paul Hempsall wrote:
Issue 1: In the Head section of my XHTML I had an empty script element
(see below). IE refused to load the page. FF had no problem with this.
script type=text/javascript src=nav.js/
To get IE past this line in the markup I had to change
A frequent request, which occasionally needs to be remade: could list
members please use plain text for posting? It makes the posts much
smaller in file size, which is kinder to those who only have dialup
connections (yes, there are still some), but more importantly, makes
the posts more
On 22 Feb 2006, at 10:00 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Easy. In both cases, 'self-closing' elements is incorrect. Both
script and div need full closing: /script and /div, whether
they're empty or not.
To expand on that answer: unless you're sending XHTML with an XML
On 10 Feb 2006, at 10:49 AM, Cade Whitbourn wrote:
Wow. Microsoft are taking very pro-active measures to assist the
developer community in fixing sites for IE7.
I received an email from someone on the 'IE7 compatibility team' with a
screenshot of our site in IE7 and a list of all our
Is there any logic I can apply (ordering CSS etc) that will affect the
order the browser requests and downloads background images?
Bear this in mind, too - some browsers will call *all* images specified
with the background property in your CSS file, whether they're needed
for that page or
On 2 Feb 2006, at 1:24 PM, Ric Raftis wrote:
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Boring, but multiple CSS files, one for each page, containing only
the bg image declarations for that page.
Maybe I've missed something, but why wouldn't you just have the one
css file but declare the background image
On 2 Feb 2006, at 1:18 PM, kvnmcwebn wrote:
nick
Bear this in mind, too - some browsers will call *all* images specified
with the background property in your CSS file, whether they're needed
for that page or not.
errr..
what browsers?
Safari, from memory... it was a while ago. Later
On 14 Dec 2005, at 11:19 AM, Nathan Wheatley wrote:
it does not work. I can't see why it
does not, but after measuring the pixel height of the buttons the
above outputs, the height is only 15px.
Is there a way to force the 26px height?
Add 'line-height: 26px' to your declaration for li...
We are using relative links in Javascript to open the attachments.
Could please anyone shed light on what might be causing this.
Well, you've answered your own question! Use absolute paths in your
links. (and... Lotus Notes?! Ouch...)
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
On 9 Nov 2005, at 7:02 PM, Absalom Media wrote:
...and the
requirements state XHTML and CSS compliance as a specific requirement
for submission to the contest.
The twist is that the designs must be submitted as PNG or JPG...
Huh? Sounds to me like the organisers just don't know what they're
On 30 Oct 2005, at 11:43 PM, Jad Madi wrote:
I'm not sure if i'm going to use defining trick, what I know about
standards markup and symantic, is to use the tag by it's meaning
rather than by How it look like,
If that is so, can you do any better with your class names than
'pinktext' and
On 7 Oct 2005, at 9:15 AM, Drake, Ted C. wrote:
it is going to make my life much easier
Ted, speaking of which - HTML messages, untrimmed - up to 34KB, and
counting. Do us a favour?
Thx - N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
James Oppenheim wrote:
I tend to use underscore for class and id, try very much to stay away
from two word file names.
This is a question (discussion?) that comes up every couple of months
here on the list - ultimately, I reckon you'll get as many
'conventions' in use as you've offered
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
1. Put the H1 in there, but set it's display to none on the style
sheet.
2. Set the header overflow to hidden, then set the top padding on the
H1 to be a pixel more than the header's height - thereby hiding the
heading text.
One problem I discovered with the
On 26 Sep 2005, at 9:50 AM, Duncan Heal wrote:
Incidentally, is there some sort of 'real' designer certificate I can
get?! ;)
Yup, it's called a cheque from a satisfied client.
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 26 Sep 2005, at 10:11 AM, kvnmcwebn wrote:
Do most wsg members - who do both the design and mark up - actually go
to
code when the design is done without looking back?
I try but alway end up going back and forth to make improvments. It
eats
time.
This is probably the biggest benefit of
Hi all
I'd really appreciate it if anyone can shed light on this non-critical
but annoying anomaly.
I've just built a couple of pages using UTF encoding, rather than
iso-8859-1, and all is as expected, except that in IE/Mac, if you View
Source, there's a single character ('?') as the very
First thing I thought when reading your message: BOM. And indeed, it
is there.
I remember, when I still used BBEdit @version 7, I had a hard time
getting rid of it. I think you have to set it first in the application
prefs, save without BOM, before opening any document.
Thanks, Philippe.
On 10 Sep 2005, at 7:18 AM, Drake, Ted C. wrote:
I hope everyone has a nice weekend.
I thought I'd share a little code I stumbled upon on one of our legacy
includes.
pbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbr
br
brbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbr
I'm tempted to extend that to 'I hope everyone has a
On 8 Sep 2005, at 8:59 AM, Craig Rippon wrote:
by-the-by: I am a web development student at Yeronga TAFE college in
Brisbane, Australia. One of my instructors has never heard of DOCTYPE,
refuses to put tags in lowercase and also refuses to close p, 'cause
they don't need to be closed.
On 8 Sep 2005, at 9:31 AM, Paul Bennett wrote:
be glad you're learning about web standards now - it'll make getting a
good job a lot easier.
The capability of my tutors wasn't much better than yours. Even
Zeldman has lamented lately (sorry - googled and couldn't find the
entry) that
On 8 Sep 2005, at 9:48 AM, Herrod, Lisa wrote:
There are actually a few excellent teachers at Sydney Institute (ultimo
TAFE) who understand and teach web site design and development with a
real
focus on web standards. Their knowledge is extremely current and while
the
old addage of
'Those
On 8 Sep 2005, at 10:43 AM, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
But not everybody can afford this kind of employment mix. If you are a
full
time lecturer all you can rely on is books, training courses and
seminars to
learn from.
What about the web itself?
That's actually no different
On 8 Sep 2005, at 10:43 AM, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
H This is going way off-topic, right?
No, no - I've enjoyed the couple of heatedly debated threads over the
past couple of days far more than the 'please fix my code' posts -
without please or thank you - that are
On 4 Sep 2005, at 8:33 PM, Officelink wrote:
I'm having problems with the following page:
http://www.officelinkonline.com.au/test/
It works fine in all modern browsers except Internet Explorer for
the mac where the divs are stretching way over to the right for some
reason.
A quick
Mordechai Peller wrote:
In general, you should recommend that they examine the code of well
written, semantically correct pages.
Sure, but first you have to teach them to recognise such things...
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 24 Aug 2005, at 6:47 PM, Bennie, Jack wrote:
Does anyone know any neat code [JScript/CSS - not PHP] that can
randomly load a selection of images into the 'background-image'
selector?
Which makes me wonder - will a browser call and execute javascript if
it's contained within, or linked
On 23 Aug 2005, at 7:48 AM, Kenny Graham wrote:
Try keeping them inline, and setting line-height to 40px. As long as
word-wrap doesn't become a factor, that should work fine. But since
you're using pixels, I'm guessing word-wrap would already cause
problems anyway.
Hmm... line-height on
On 23 Aug 2005, at 8:41 AM, Adam Burmister ((DSL AK)) wrote:
Could somebody please check it in Safari?
Hmm again - not quite.
See http://www.omnivision.com.au/test/safari.gif
Sorry, gotta go to work right now - I'll check in later and see how
you're doing...
N
On 20 Aug 2005, at 7:48 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
Would some knowledgeable participant enlighten on the behavior of IE
in Virtual PC for the MAC?
Respectfully,
C
PS
I hope my questions are not banal, due to the absences of replies,
I'm beginning to feel like the carrier of something
On 21 Aug 2005, at 10:31 PM, Chris Kennon wrote:
Does IE in Virtual PC display the same quirks as the XP, 2000 version
of IE? I'm a MAC OS user, but would like to test CSS in IE before
going to Browser CAM.
Hope this clarifies :)
C
PS
The wit of this list is just a sharp as the
On 22 Aug 2005, at 12:18 AM, Jan Brasna wrote:
Does this statement imply the machine hosting Virtual PC and IE
becomes vulnerable to malicious software?
No. Only the guest OS (WXP, W2K) is vulnerable. It runs in sandbox.
no reason to suspect anything will be different
Colors are
On 12 Aug 2005, at 5:17 AM, Richard Lake wrote:
if I could somehow get the right hand image slide to behind the left
hand image instead of drop beneath it then I can support widths of
less than
770 without the header breaking. Is there a way of doing this?
Richard, check out my site; I do
Roger that. I gave up after Hi all'. Plain text, please, people?!
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On 9 Aug 2005, at 8:05 PM, Rick Faaberg wrote:
On 8/9/05 3:00 AM Brendan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent
this
out:
I've come crawling back with
On 10 Aug 2005, at 8:55 AM, Barry Beattie wrote:
hi all
this is the first time I've done anything like this but I'm wondering
what it takes to display two languages (and therefore two charsets) on
the same page? - English and German
the content will be a side-by-side translation of each
On 25 Jul 2005, at 5:08 PM, Edward Clarke wrote:
Yes – I think 120kb is big (not huge though). If there is a way to
make it smaller, feel free to suggest and I’ll implement.
As an aside, please spare a thought for those of us on this list stuck
on 56k lines? The messages in this thread are
On 15 Jul 2005, at 4:34 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
Has anyone a sliding panel solution, such as
this(http://www.siteexperts.com/tips/techniques), that is
cross-browser and standards compliant ?
Your sample: Directory Listing Denied. This Virtual Directory does not
allow contents to be listed.
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
But then I thought I should check to see if there would be any
problems using an
underscore in an id or class. Is it one of the legal characters?
Don't know about 'legal', but I have had problems with certain browsers
in the past ignoring css rules applied to classes
On 5 Jul 2005, at 2:15 AM, Wayne Godfrey wrote:
My problem is in the header and specifically the subnav which, in
IE, throws the rest of the layout out of whack. The logo and main nav
are fixed in size, but I would like the subnav font to size up or down
as the rest of the layout does.
On 29 Jun 2005, at 7:23 AM, Bruce Gilbert wrote:
I am having a devil of a time trying to fix a problem with page not
aligning correctly width wise in IE on the PC.
If you are on IE on the PC and go to
http://www.inspired-evolution.com/Hireme.php you will see what I mean.
The dark blue area
On 25 Jun 2005, at 4:37 PM, Cole Kuryakin - x7m wrote:
I'm almost embarrased to ask this because it's such a minor detail,
but it's driving me crazy.
First, the link: http://www.x7m.us/_testing/index2.htm
This is a new design I'm just starting to build. If you look at it in
On 25 Jun 2005, at 8:20 PM, Cole Kuryakin - x7m wrote:
The height of the div was already declared (although 10px instead of
9px
like it should be - fixed that). Line-height, zero padding hasn't
solved the
problem.
I actually had a similar problem - but only with 2px extra space - on a
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
