re.
On 1/4/06, Patrick H. Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Street wrote:
> > This is a seriously odd problem, resulting from Photoshop's PNG
> > output/Firefox 1,0.x's PNG decoder (I think).
> >
> > Test case at
> > http://joahua
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/tables.cfm is a great resource.
I find particularly interesting
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/tables.cfm#very , as it
demonstrates that "accessible" tables needn't be meagre and can, in
fact, contain quite a lot of structured information. It sounds as
t
This is a seriously odd problem, resulting from Photoshop's PNG
output/Firefox 1,0.x's PNG decoder (I think).
Test case at
http://joahua.com/blog/2006/01/04/photoshopfirefox-10x-and-the-case-of-the-mystery-line
Anyone seen this before?
Note that the size of both images is 210px: in the Photosho
Ah, yes, that's what I was trying to do. If I just install both I end
up getting plugins overlapping between installs, and can't run both at
once (I think because of the way it calls new windows?)
Thanks!
Josh
On 1/3/06, Patrick H. Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roberto Gorjão wrote:
> > To
1.5 at the minute (though generally they're faster to adopt newer
versions).
Apologies for a slightly application/not-web-standards related
question... all in the name of testing ;-)
Regards,
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://joahua.com/
+61
Just tried with Sleight (which, incidentally, I'd read about before
but forgotten existed!) and got the same security warning from
IE6/XPSP2. =( Any suggestions welcome at this point! (Except for using
GIFs/indexed transparency :P)
On 12/28/05, Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
h
On 12/28/05, Absalom Media <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Street wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just wondering if anyone's had any luck with using JUST the PNG
> > component of Dean Edwards' IE7 JavaScript? The full thing seems like
> > o
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone's had any luck with using JUST the PNG
component of Dean Edwards' IE7 JavaScript? The full thing seems like
overkill, because that's the only feature I really need.
Alternatively, how does one go about getting alpha support for CSS
background images? Not having a g
; --
>
> Ben Curtis : webwright
> bivia : a personal web studio
> http://www.bivia.com
> v: (818) 507-6613
>
>
>
>
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guideline
elines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **********
>
>
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for ht
iscussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **********
> ***
gt; Geoff.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ******
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **
>
>
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
css/skifestival.css
>
> Regards
> Morten Fjellman
>
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
Ah, my bad. I'd seen it misused/causing validation errors in the past,
so assumed that it was just not to be used at all.
Josh
On 12/11/05, Terrence Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8 Dec 2005, at 8:17 PM, Joshua Street wrote:
> >
> >
> > You're usi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.12/194 - Release Date:
> >> 12/7/2005
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
gt; wrote:
> Thx :) Semantically, I thought it better to have like:
> http://www.xyzcorp.com"; ... class="sponsor xyzcorp">XYZCorp
> and then stylistically 'overload' this with a nice GIF. Perhaps not? I
> don't know.
>
>
> Joshua Street w
*
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **
>
>
--
Joshua Street
Lea
> --
> Lea de Groot
> Elysian Systems
> Brisbane Australia
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> *
ebsites
>
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> *
ks
> Kim
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> *
Single sane reason: Well now, I suppose they're not trying to get
themselves indexed by a search engine, are they? ;-)
josh
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
On 12/8/05, Lea de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/12/2005, at 12:54 PM, Paul
m presentation in the "why CSS is good" argument.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
>
> This one all alone on the page, with no linked JS in the :
>
>
>
>
>
> var d=new Date();
>
> yr=d.getFullYear();
>
> if (yr!=2003)
>
> document.write("© "
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
> http://webstandards.org/
> __
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup
Haven't got time to try (last HSC exam tomorrow! woo! -- final school
exams here in NSW Australia), but maybe using the display: property to
ditch normal table-like behaviours for the thead?
http://www.w3schools.com/css/pr_class_display.asp
Then try position:fixed. No idea if this works or not, bu
It seems to me that is a plain way
> to do that job m8.
>
>
> header
> item1
> ...
>
>
> dl is handy because you can use more "headers" (dt tags) in the same list etc.
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
***
n
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **
OS X) restricts application somewhat. :-(
I'm interested to hear if anyone's encountered/had any dealings with it, though.
Kind regards,
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstand
27;utility');
according to Peter's original markup. Just thought I'd point that out.
regards,
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://web
On 11/1/05, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello all,
> Ive started designing sites for this company that specilizes in .net
> databases driven/xml feed type sites. I just give them a graphics file and
> they slice it up. Anyway they asked me yesterday if i could do this
> particular job w
hough... just for future reference...?
Josh
On 11/1/05, Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just done on a site that is near-pixel perfect in (I think) everything
> but Opera, which does something weird with the nav (rendering the site
> unusable).
>
> I hav
ble (I've got a 1280x1024 display here, a colleague
on 1024x768 couldn't see it at all)... and stop the links from being
clickable (whilst the image-replacement was still visible).
http://spl.base10solutions.net/events.html
That's the URL, any ideas?
Thanks :)
A bamboozle
talking about, and it takes hours for me to make any script
do what I need it to do!)
Hope this isn't too far off the mark...
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgro
TECTED] address you
can send a blank message to unsubscribe to. Maybe that would suffice
for the footer, if such a thing is possible with whatever software the
listserv is using?
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The
Speaking pragmatically, does it matter? I think Firefox is pretty
good, and I personally use it (with web developer extension) to build
stylesheets (I find it really helpful to watch the elements fall into
place as I adjust styles in realtime).
That is, for me, the fastest way to get a style that
On 10/30/05, Mark Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seriously, why is this flamebait. I suggested this in another thread a
> couple of days ago. Is there a problem I'm not aware of with server-side
> sniffing?
Mm, well... it's not really a problem if it's properly maintained.
But, seeing as many
On 10/30/05, Kenny Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So back to the original question, is there any way to serve a rule
> only to firefox (or only to non-firefox) without invalidating the css?
Heh, server-side browser sniffing? ;-)
Josh
**
T
there's an easy workaround for this, but I don't know what it is.
> Anyone care to provide some pointers?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion lis
a
hurry to make a point!
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
rm elements) and add a rule to your stylesheet to
stop this from appearing.
HTH,
Josh
On 10/29/05, csslist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://65.36.226.10/contact/contact.cfm
>
> ________
> From: Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday,
Example link?
On 10/29/05, csslist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a hidden field in a css styled form and when you view the page it's
> shown as a line in firefox, any ideas?
> tia
>
> dave
>
>
--
Joshua Street
http://www
e
> subtable elements.
>
> Does anyone have a suggestion?
>
> Does this make sense?
>
>
>
> Ted
>
>
>
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
Solutions, including developer API
>
> ** Domain Registration, .COM for as low as AUSD$15 a year, .COM.AU for
> AUSD$50 two years!
>
> ** Seamless Merchant integration
>
> ** We endorse PayPal, accept payments online now!
>
>
>
> > -Original Messa
> AUSD$50 two years!
>
> ** Seamless Merchant integration
>
> ** We endorse PayPal, accept payments online now!
>
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
N�ŠÇ.²È¨žX¬µú+†Ûiÿü nËZ�Ö«vÈ+¢êh®Òyèm¶ŸÿÁæ쵩Ýj·l‚º.¦Šàþf¢—ø.‰×¥Šw¬qùŸ¢»(™èbžÛ(žš,¶)උazX¬¶¶)à…éi
Heh, actually, "ie7" with "I'm feeling lucky" is enough.
On 10/28/05, Paul Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The ie7 hack being what?
>
> Good grief, come on people! Let your fingers do the walking before asking
> questions one google search could answer you
> http://www.google.co.nz/sea
On 10/28/05, Focas, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The ie7 hack being what?
>
> grant
http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/ I presume...
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cf
On 10/28/05, csslist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i put the ie7 hack in and it works fine now.
>
> gotta love ie
How big is that thing? Can you split it up so you can just use the
bits you need (i.e. :pseudo-selector), or do you need to use the full
thing? I'd heard it's largish (but haven't ever
background: #ff;
> color: #27455f;
> border: 1px solid #ff;
> }
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/g
Yeah. I think it's kind of Gmail's fault. You'll note the mailing list signature isn't showing up on my messages, either. I'm sending this message in HTML format in the hope it stays more intact than plain text
when the WSG list processes it... there's something seriously wrong
with Gmail vs. WSG
On 10/25/05, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Normally I would do that, but in this particular case I was hoping not to
> use server-side formatting of the content. But it seems I will have to
> revert to that.
>
> I have never had any use for the tag. Now I thought I
ctly I need to put it in tags, but of course I want it to still
> fit into the rest of the content.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Street
> Sent: Monday, 24 October 2005 6:32 PM
> To: wsg@webstandards
> Any ideas?
>
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **
>
>
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
ain in the boundaries of my parent element.
>
> Any ideas?
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
nd be able to place it where we want, but we can't use legend
> and place/style how we want. Choose one".
Yes.
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
N���.�Ȩ�X���+��i�� n�Z�֫v�+��h��y�m�쵩�j�l��.f���.�ץ�w�q(��b��(��,�)උazX����)��
ey're only a security issue whenyou have launched the program right? so if i'm launching them (old
standalone IE5 & 5.5) once a month to *only* test pages that I'vecreated - I'm not leaving my system open to some rogue securitybreaching action right?-- Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/+61 (0) 425 808 469
, but I've built pages just to
generate content before that was "printed" to PS then to PDF... and
this would be really useful for me there (e.g. for generating
numbered, printed content in a run-once context).
Regards,
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
n em value to make it work well with fluid
layouts.
HTH,
Josh
--
Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(both are
installed)?
For the record, IE/Win renders "correctly" (in the desired fashion,
that is), as does Opera/Lin and Konqueror/Lin.
Is this a bug? Any ideas?
Slightly perlexed,
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 02:58 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
> I think of it more as, on Mac there is a decent browser (safari). So
> there isn't much need for FF there. Whereas PC users really need FF.
It's also worth remembering Opera have recently released their browser
for free (as in beer), s
Not strictly DC, but along a similar vein... don't suppose anyone knows
if any/many search engines take ICBM meta data or geo.position meta data
into account when determining local content?
I ask because, whilst Google is generally pretty good with localised
versions (my personal site[1] is a .com
n of relevance) image _does_ matter for a number
of websites out there... and CSS("standards")-based design can help achieve
this, because you've got more than one shot at specifying fonts to target
different platforms... amongst other things, like handheld stylesheets, etc.
Josh
--
Joshua Street
base10solutions
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
<>
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 22:58 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
> Isn't < b > still valid? If you want to have a weightless way of
> bolding the text, but don't want to mess with a span, use < b > .
Yes. It's in the presentation module for XHTML 1.1
(
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstra
and can only be used for
href data.
So... is there any way to define this relationship? Or is it just
order-of-content and hoping it makes sense? What if you were to put the
cite after the quote for whatever reason (style guide convention, etc)?
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10sol
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 12:00 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since the testimonial is basically a quote, why not use the element?
> Then use the presidents name within the element. This way it is
> semantic, and you still get to style the presidents name any way that you
> feel fit!
>
> Chee
I wasn't aware this was an issue:
http://www.richinstyle.com/bugs/ie5b.html#display would suggest that
it's not.
http://wellstyled.com/singlelang.php?lang=en&page=css-inline-blocks.html
has some more that looks related... it looks achievable, but I haven't
got IE5 here to test.
g (up) breaks immediately
> > because you've set the
> > heights of #integration, #consumer, #special, #starter, #site and #quote in
> > pixels. Unsetting
> > all of these doesn't particularly break anything, though when resizing the
> > length of the column
pper extends as far as it has to,
continuing the white background all the way down (I think... I've never
been completely on top of that whole clearing thing, so I'm not 100%
sure that'll work... the theory runs something like that, though. Play
around.)
HTH,
Josh
Kind Regards,
J
tarting with establishing boundaries in the form of what is "most
easily coded up" is more constraining than building your layout, then
going back and altering [the design] if things just aren't possible in
the medium.
Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 21:52
namely, the _presentation_ of content in a certain way, without the
markup-muck that tags bring on.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mo
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:46 +1000, John Allsopp wrote:
> You'll hear more about that at WE045
I hope we don't have to wait until 2045 for quality coding to catch on!
;-)
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0
.html
As developers who understand the importance of standards, we are well
and truly out of excuses. There are exceptions to every rule, but these
are becoming increasingly sparse: perhaps the only valid (haha) excuse
remaining is that of a target audience consisting largely of pre-version
5 user
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 23:40 -0400, Donna Jones wrote:
> does anyone have an url for this? tried finding it on moz and couldn't
> and really would like to try it out.
http://accessibar.mozdev.org/
HTH
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solut
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 12:01 +0100, Patrick Lauke wrote:
> > Joshua Street
>
> > Actually, it's probably using Windows' built in text-to-speech for
> > rendering audio, so possibly not.
>
> Actually, it's using a java text-to-speech engine, so it's
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 01:42 -0500, dwain alford wrote:
> Rick Faaberg wrote:
> it's a browser extension, so it should function on
> mac osx.
Actually, it's probably using Windows' built in text-to-speech for
rendering audio, so possibly not.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
Opera uses, but rather
just a text-resizing feature (ala Firefox, et al.), then it's really
worth asking why on earth you were using pixels in the first place, as
you know that you're ultimately relinquishing control, and all you're
really doing is irritating your us
opriate design practises to match this, rather than
trying to force your users/visitors into one particular framework which
then breaks as they attempt to escape it.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutio
r a print-world mindset?
Surely if it's a branding thing it should be possible to reach a
compromise -- print style sheet shouldn't translate as "devoid of all
style", one would hope.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone:
; > blockquote)[...]
I think I missed the start of this thread, but we discussed this on here
sometime last year... I posted relevant bits on my blog at the time.
http://www.joahua.com/blog/2004/10/24/the-indentation-problem
"Just the...
As he...
Supporting...
By a....
S
. If I cant find one,
> I’ll probably start writing one then make it open source down the
> track, however I don’t really have that much time to wait for it.
This may be doing the same thing, I'm uncertain.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com
there's also other ways to do it, but I
imagine that must be something screen reader users would get sick of
quickly: "site map slash slash about us slash slash..." (presuming
that's how it works?)
Aside from those fairly minor things, the markup is great quality and
the design is
anybody care to do a
> super-quick check?
Can't check Safari (no Mac here), but Konqueror 3.4.0 copes fine.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia
searching for hours on google
> didn't help for css background sizing in %.
>
> Anyone can help?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Bruce Prochnau
> BKDesign Solutions
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax:
reasons it's a bad practise...
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
___
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:39 +1000, Joshua Street wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"; version="1.0">
>width="202px" height="61px"/>
> tag properly... oops.
Josh
**
The discussion
it, except how to use them so they will validate.
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"; version="1.0">
or tags in sight...
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 4
cceptably. Could someone with a Mac please check the test page?
>
> Thanks!
>
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
r going to be
descriptive in the way some members desire - and this isn't anyone's
fault, but it is something we can work to correct as the thread of
discussion progresses.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solut
is no significant relationship between the actual data (e.g. folder
names) and the interface (e.g. edit/delete links) better represented
through use of lists than simply with anchors.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fa
n unordered list to
> separate the links. But this won't work in this particular example, I think.
> My nested lists would clash with each other.
>
> I can't come up with any nice solution for this that adheres to web
> standards and makes things accessible.
>
> Any sug
clicked the link
> > again...so the site is definitely still there.
> >
> Yes, the URL (apple's site) above is working, but not the download link
> (ftp://ftp.osxgnu.org/pub/Networking/Lynx-2.8.6-10.2-10.4.dmg.sit) the url
> provided.
>
> A domain search shows
ppealing form when technology supports this becomes a (relatively)
trivial task.
Just a thought...
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Mu
"Configuration error"
Parser Error Message: The format of the file
'FuelAdvance.Components.Web' is invalid.
Line 35. Yeah, the form layout has some issues :P
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 17:15 +1000, Tatham Oddie wrote:
> Guys n’ gals,
>
>
>
> I’m having some quirky layout issues with
> http://sur
>>It's just always felt dirty seeing certain characters
> >>not written in their appropriate entity codes.
> Hmmm...that's a very English centric view of the Web ;-)
Yeah, I thought that too, but couldn't think of another way to say it!
*blushes whilst wishing he we
certain characters not written in their
appropriate entity codes.
Could someone shed any light on this? Are entity codes redundant, or
should we be using them where possible?
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
riticise the idea
on that point).
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
___
;s not a list, and shouldn't be marked up as one.
> It's a single paragraph with a line break. Looks pretty
> straight-forward if you ask me.
>
> ~john
> _
> Dr. Zeus Web Design
> http://www.DrZeus.net
> "content without clutter&qu
s, but they are on separate lines, and
are therefore separated by a line break (yeah, I know, is
theoretically semantically null... shrug!)
Looks okay to me...
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
rect' way are beyond the letter
of web standards, but adhere to their spirit - namely, ensuring a more
meaningful and accessible web.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-
http://photomatt.net/tools/texturize makes it really easy. He's also
responsible for the WordPress blogging software (I know, off topic...)
which has that function embedded. Quotation marks and apostrophes, if
copied out of Word, can give you all kinds of messy encoding errors...
best to either u
p.s. whose idea was this:
http://www.lastminute.com/site/main/boss_page_spreadsheet.html
I laughed... :D
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:28 +0100, Tom Hamshere wrote:
> Any feedback appreciated.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060
d Malaga from Â74" - div.page_content >
div.single_column > h2 > a according to Firefox's Web Developer toolbar
"View style information" utility.
Generally, great site!
Kind Regards,
Joshu
101 - 200 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
