The iPhone has a 5mb upper limit per page. I think the ipad's limit is 10mb but
I am not sure. So in other words, no.
-Breton
On 09/08/2010, at 2:55 PM, Andrew Harris and...@woowoowoo.com wrote:
Hi all, I'm asking around the traps on a question which has come up at work.
We want to
I have a stripped down example of it here. The bug only occurs in IE
7, and possibly ie6, and it occurs in IE8 running in compatibility
mode. I cannot be sure whether it happens in IE8 in IE8 mode or not.
(MS have made the compatibility mode interface so bloody complex I
can't figure out whether
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Joseph Taylor j...@sitesbyjoe.com wrote:
I took a look at your source code - there are a whole bunch of issues
beginning with oddities in your HTML - things like:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
I see I have still not conviced you of the weirdness of this bug. I've
updated my version to have a 1px border, and more items in the list,
which are NOT covered by the P element. None of them are clickable,
disconfirming your conclusions.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Kepler Gelotte
Then perhaps you would care to explain why this document:
http://zenpsycho.com/quirkstest2.htm
activates standards mode, when the table you've linked to suggests
that it should be in quirks mode?
for comparison, here's a typical html 4.0 strict doctype:
http://zenpsycho.com/quirkstest1.htm
I
So you think that there's an invisible part to the paragraph that is
not outlined by the border? Kind of makes the border 1px approach to
development kind of useless in IE in the face of behavior like this,
don't you think? But I still don't think this idea quite matches up.
In the broken version,
To counter my point and support yours though, setting a width on the P
tag also makes the elements clickable. Which does seem to suggest that
the P tag extends vertically down further than its border suggests it
does.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Breton Slivka z...@zenpsycho.com wrote:
So you
if you have javascript related questions/talk, you can try
comp.lang.javascript. Here:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/topics?pli=1
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Brett Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hate to ask another question about JavaScript, but I need help
JScript was originally created as an exact reverse engineering of
Javascript (including the mistakes), so that IE could read pages with
javascript on them. This was of course, during the browser wars when
they were competing for features. Jscript has fallen a bit behind
Javascript by now, so there
It is my understanding that the bulk of those OOP design patterns are
useful to get around the limitations of static languages like C++ and
Java, that don't allow you to arbitrarily add/remove properties from
instances, change the type of a value, or allow higher order functions
(functions that
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Brett Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. But, one final question. Was the first ever implementation of
JavaScript designed to be object-oriented, object-based, or prototype-based?
Thank you all.
Here is Brenden Eich, Javascript's creator, pontificating
The term Javascript is indeed owned by Sun. The implementation of
Ecmascript in IE is called JScript, not Javascript, so it doesn't
infringe the trademark (technically, but it's similar enough that
people can still easily think that IE calls it Javascript)
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Brett
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luke,
Discrediting c++ has nothing to do with the question Is JavaScript
object-orientated?. With that, and in closing, I would like to point out
that my comments were based on the actual question - asking if
or not. Or, if you have not changed the topic,
you appear to be assuming that everyone is in agreement that classes
are a required attribute of OOP. This is arbitrary and nonsensical.
Thanks,
Anthony.
Breton Slivka wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Lets all just agree then, that the first insulin is simply the best, so no
further development in this area is needed. I am going to link you to two
more resources. If you feel that the first ever implementation
I am providing to attempt to help you
understand (as I gather you would not be reading any references I have
provided, which conflict with your argument anyway).
Thanks,
Anthony.
Breton Slivka wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Lets
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit off topic, but not totally: are there any free good online
tutorials (best practices and/or standards based) to help me learn to
write javascript?
Thanks,
Nancy
This is the best javascript lesson book online
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A 'superset' of ECMA3 which is not fully compliant. Right...
I think you're confused. Maybe you you're thinking of the w3c dom-
Which is a seperate standard and topic from javascript/ecmascript.
All implementations of
But on the other side, I'm not sure how many people use add ons like no
flash or no script and there's no way to find out.
Cheers,
Johan
Yes, there IS a way to find out: Compare server logs with which people
actually executed the analytics script. I just haven't seen any
implementations of
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But on the other side, I'm not sure how many people use add ons like no
flash or no script and there's no way to find out.
Cheers,
Johan
Yes, there IS a way to find out: Compare server logs with which people
actually
Read the story on that page carefully. What has happened is that flash
10 has increased restrictions over what features within the flash
plugin can be invoked via javascript. This only applies to one
specific feature (file uploads), and effects virtually no other flash
features. It does not effect
I don't mind so much about the javascript thing myself, my problem is
that contentEditable areas don't generate onChange events like form
elements do, so they are very difficult to script properly
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Robin Gorry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, this is an in-house
Might I suggest quite simply, that in the alt attribute, you write in
english, basically what you would say if you were to read the
mathematical expression out loud? This has the best chance of being
converted into something comprehensible by a screen reader. I am
assuming of course that screen
jQuery is really good because, unlike some other frameworks, it
doesn't lock you into its little world. You're still coding in
javascript, and jQuery is just a really handy set of functions to help
you out with just the really frustrating parts.
It's really important to use a framework nowadays
Just playing around in the console..
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Keryx Web [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Concerning Chrome, I have some unanswered questions about V8.
Exactly what JavaScript features does it support? (This is NOT a question
about it's speed.)
The release statememt simply
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 8:55 PM, David McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
For a while now, I've been operating on the principle Code for Firefox,
hack for IE.
That is, writing CSS for the most standards-compliant browser, and then
making adjustments for non-standard behaviour.
I said
Though really I'm not sure why you need javascript at all for this
particular application. It would be much easier to just ditch the
javascript, and code straight standards compliance. You would lose
nothing, since the javascript you're proposing adds nothing. (unless
I'm misunderstanding, you're
Oops, I missed the bit about the form element. In that case,
everything I just said, except add a Submit button to your original
form element, and an action set to the path of your php script, and
the method set to get, the name of your paging element set to match
the name of the parameter that
The @font-face rule does appear in CSS 2.0, but not in 2.1. CSS 2.1 is
a revision of CSS 2.0 made in response to a lack of implementation of
certain features in CSS 2.0, so 2.1 closer resembles what is
implemented. (however still plenty in 2.1 that is not perfectly
implemented)
@font-face
such as SIFR. (google it)
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The @font-face rule does appear in CSS 2.0, but not in 2.1. CSS 2.1 is
a revision of CSS 2.0 made in response to a lack of implementation of
certain features in CSS 2.0, so 2.1 closer resembles what
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Marius Milcher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HCI,
Databases, Dynamic Programming, (X)HTML, CSS, Usability, Design
Methodologies etc. and, as an entry requirement, that this knowledge come
from a relevant computing degree.
M
I know that is how universities
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Anthony Milner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have two flash files - 1 contains a flash menu the other contains an
animation. We are trying to position them on top of each other...
I don't know, I might be mistaken, but given that this is the web
standards
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Steve Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Accessibility, though in a sense is trivially easy once you know it
That would not even be true if it was possible to 'know it', which it isn't.
Accessibility isn't just a bunch of facts that you have to learn, and it's
I don't really feel like participating in the dramatic part of this-
But I can answer some of the questions about javascript.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 6:53 PM, dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm more of a designer than a developer. my knowledge of javascript is
limited. i am currently
It should be made clear that there really is no such thing as Client
Side Validation. What we are talking about here is client side form
assistance. The goal of validation is to make 100% sure that the data
you are recieving is of the correct type, and contains no extraneous
data or security
Microsoft is and has undoubtedly used the coercive power of their
market dominance to interfere with OTHER businesses. What you are
presenting here is a double standard. You are saying that governments
(whose accountability is to the benefit of the public at large) should
not be allowed to
On Nov 28, 2007 12:14 AM, Martin Heiden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
on Tuesday, November 27, 2007 at 13:50 Web Standards Group wrote:
On 15/11/07 (11:15) Ross said:
document.write
inline event handlers (like onclick)
browser sniffing
In summary, then, does anyone
It's a bit pedantic, but it's actually IE that has this wrong. Since
Firefox's ecmascript implementation is the basis for the ecmascript
standard- any deviation from firefox that IE exhibits is by definition
breaking the standard. Cute eh?
On Nov 22, 2007 10:12 AM, Karl Lurman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Javascript is a big subject, and generally can't be summarized or
simplified sensibly unless there's some particular aspect of it that
you're especially interested in. Are you looking for something like a
quick overview of the language itself, or perhaps some tutorial for
getting a particular task
You may also be running into the same domain policy,
On 11/2/07, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/1/07, Michael Horowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange to be answering my own post but I have done some more testing.
I have verified the PHP page that Ajax calls works
Do you have any specific questions, or do you just want us to do your
homework for you?
-Breton.
On 11/1/07, Alexander Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I have some questions for an assignment that I can't figure out. If anyone
could be of assistance that would be much appreciated.
Opera has the best support for handheld and projection stylesheets of
any of the major browsers, and this is a fact which they are most
proud of.
I don't know about SVG, but you can test, because opera desktop has a
mode you can activate in which it simulates opera mini. Also, since
it's a java
Would you want the mail templates to use standards and seperation of
concerns? Last time I looked, it was well nigh impossible to get an
email that was standards based AND rendered properly in virtually
*any* email client. Im sure they could have made the templates
standards based, in which case,
and my point was: Apple isn't advertising the templates as being only
viewable in Apple mail, it's advertising them as being viewable in
*any* mail client.
This implies that they do not have seperation of concerns, because
there's no standard of support for that.
Apologies- I didn't mean my original post as a direct response to
patrick, merely a response to the thread.
On 10/23/07, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and my point was: Apple isn't advertising the templates as being only
viewable in Apple mail, it's advertising them as being viewable
I'm not entirely sure. The HTML/plain text announcements we send out are
standards-based with one exception - we embed the CSS in the body section.
These mails display perfectly in Outlook, OE, Windows Mail, Apple Mail, and
Thunderbird. The problem with Outlook, I believe, is more to do with
These are some of the worst analogies I've ever seen. The target
website is not a work of art, it's not a mountain, it's not a car,
it's not a drive up ATM, it's not a building.
Not to mention the slippery slopes, like Well if they force Target to
fix their website, next they'll be forcing it on
On 10/4/07, Chris Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of ' logical fallacy'
If you have an argument, make it. Don't assume that just because you
think you're clever and right, that everyone else automatically will
too.
On 10/4/07, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So you reckon that businesses should have all the rights of a person,
but none of the responsibilities?
On 10/4/07, Jim Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Chris on this one.
Speaking only of businesses int he United States, no government entity
should be telling a private business
with Jaws? I would say yes.
Would it be easy to navigate, enjoyable and worth the time? I don't think
so.
On 9/26/07, Breton Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This might sound silly, but here it is anyway:
Flash can do more than just graphics- You can also play sounds and
manipulate
This might sound silly, but here it is anyway:
Flash can do more than just graphics- You can also play sounds and
manipulate them, to a certain extent with code. I've always wondered
what the possibilities would be if someone applied themselves to
making not just a website which is merely
Hey Paul,
I'm not 100% sure what you mean by defining microformats as an xml
namespace, but I do know that the microformats community uses the x2v
stylesheets as the reference implementation for many microformats, including
hcalendar and hcard. http://suda.co.uk/projects/X2V/
That's about as
One more thing:
the microformats mailing list
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss/
Is just as friendly and open as this one, just as easy to join, but has the
added advantage that it's full of experts on microformats.
-Breton
On 7/12/07, Stuart Foulstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but that's still graphic design of the appearance of Websites, NOT
Website Design.
No, it's Graphic Design, Not Graphic Design of the Appearance of
Websites. Qualifying it in such a way confuses matters, and is
terribly innaccurate.
There's two approaches, one is to use the Hixie style flash embedding,
and include your text/html content nested inside the inner object
element. This content is visible to text browsers and google. This is
demonstrable by searching for the string:
FAIL (the browser should render some flash
This issue really pushes my buttons, I will admit. I had my rant (my initial
post), and I naively believed that would be pretty much the end of it. I
forgot that I push buttons when I'm ranting. I've even provided an out in my
last post inviting people to continue this conversation off list. That
On 7/12/07, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not that this will necessarily address Marvin's issues, but I just
couldn't let it go by :-)
First, lets understand the different aspects of web development.
1) Web Design - This involves understanding colors, extensive knowledge
in
On 7/12/07, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
, you are wrong about graphic design.
..but seriously, I have *never* seen an ad for a Graphic Designer
(or worse, mislabeled Web Designer) that looked for anything but
Photoshop/Illustrator, possibly Flash, proficiency. Nothing about
This is quite useful to me. Though I don't quite understand how it works. Is
the iframe important to the functioning? Is there a way to do the same
thing, but make the state bookmarkable?
On 6/8/07, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put this together, but I'm not sure it could be
Tell that to this search engine:
http://kitchen.technorati.com/search/
On 21/05/2007, at 9:31 PM, Rob Kirton wrote:
More precisely, the use of id and class can only add semantic value
to developers or to those who have to maintain the site. They have
no bearing on real world semantics in
you can try either inline-block, or instead of inline, float:left.
This is typically the solution I usually end up using.
On 20/05/2007, at 10:02 PM, Designer wrote:
Has anyone got a (simple) workaround for the fact that I want to
specify the width of each li in an inline list? (which is
This might seem obvious, but have you considered combining them into
a single image, and adding them as a single background to the OL
instead?
On 17/05/2007, at 7:25 PM, Paul Collins wrote:
Hi all,
I recently had to add numerical bullet point graphics to an OL. This
meant I had to add an
you can do it like this:
http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/menus/demo.html
But you should know that this UI pattern is a usability/accessability
disaster, and usually a symptom of poor content organization. I would
encourage better organization in order to avoid these altogether.
On
a slightly degraded
experience, as long as they can still use and access the site.
On 28/04/2007, at 8:31 PM, Designer wrote:
Breton Slivka wrote:
you can do it like this:
http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/menus/demo.html
But you should know that this UI pattern is a usability/
accessability
On 26/04/2007, at 5:19 PM, Andrew Harris wrote:
On 4/26/07, Stuart Foulstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you explain why the script snippet has to be in the head?
Will it have some some adverse effect on other pages if in a common
external file? If so, why can't it be in an additional
try Safari Enhancer. It enables you to turn on the hidden debug
features built into safari, among a few other settings.
On 14/03/2007, at 10:17 AM, Héctor Lupuche wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm looking for a way to debug in Safari, I have tried Drosera but
I'm unable to install, I have not any mac
Web 2.0 is a generalized marketing term used to describe a trend. The
trend it is describing is about sites like flickr, del.icio.us,
youtube, and even myspace, which utilize the network effect to let
users produce the content for the website, and generate massive
communities around
In my experience, it's a bad move to try and sell a client on the
technology you intend to use. The more technologically unsavvy they
are, the less interested they will be in what technology you are
using. (Remember this is my experience).
I've had better success determining what problems
On 01/03/2007, at 9:31 AM, libwebdev wrote:
Hi folks,
I followed a recent thread here on how people manage their links,
and I made a request to our organisation's webmaster to allow
MultiViews for my department's website (which I manage, and which
is part of a large public
69 matches
Mail list logo
