I've been working with he data generated by surveys, for quite a number of
years and tip that I can give that applies in example is that a boolean
question (aka Yes/No) is represented by 4 states, when asked in a web form,
i.e.
- no response was saved, eg form was served correctly, form was hacked
Agreed it does depend entirely on the situation and users. By universally
implemented I wasn't being flippant, I meant to be saying that things have
moved on, just the modified model of radio set use doesn't work everywhere.
For some reason undefined/unset radio button sets get overlooked by u
lol, well yes but then that would be attempting to break the input device on
real radios. Funnily we must be twins because as a kid I used to try to do
that too. I broke so much stuff...
On 8 Jun 2010, at 05:39, Lucien Stals wrote:
> And I seem to recall that the old radios on which the me
Agreed it does depend entirely on the situation and users. By universally
implemented I wasn't being flippant, I meant to be saying that things have
moved on, just the modified model of radio set use doesn't work everywhere.
For some reason undefined/unset radio button sets get overlooked by u
Lucien Stals wrote:
And I seem to recall that the old radios on which the metaphor is based
could be pushed half in. That would cause all buttons to pop out thus
having *no* selection.
Poor implementations don't define a design pattern. :-)
--
Hassan Schroeder -
And I seem to recall that the old radios on which the metaphor is based could
be pushed half in. That would cause all buttons to pop out thus having *no*
selection. Not saying that as a justification for having no selection in a
radio group. Just pointing out that the metaphor wears a bit thin ;
On 7 June 2010 14:58, Steve Gibbings wrote:
> I have a problem with that. Radio button sets should always have an
> option selected, there is no undefined selection. This makes sense when you
> remember where the radio button metaphor came from. However seems that
> doesn't get universally imp
I have a problem with that. Radio button sets should always have an option
selected, there is no undefined selection. This makes sense when you remember
where the radio button metaphor came from. However seems that doesn't get
universally implemented.
On 7 Jun 2010, at 02:25, Ben Buchanan
On 4 June 2010 12:29, nedlud wrote:
> I have a web form I'm building and there is a simple yes/no question in it.
> I got to wondering what the best semantic mark up for this is? Does anyone
> have any good UI/UX suggestions?
>
> My three ideas were...
>
> Two radio buttons for "yes" and "no"...
Hi Lucien,
> I have a web form I'm building and there is a simple yes/no question in
it.
> I got to wondering what the best semantic mark up for this is? Does
anyone have any good UI/UX suggestions?
>
> My three ideas were...
>
> Two radio buttons for "yes" and "no"...
> Do you...?
> Yes
> No
>
>
Yeah, your this structure is good, I think
2010/6/4 Lea de Groot
> On 4/06/10 2:41 PM, nedlud wrote:
>
>> The full questions in the form is "Do you require an interpreter?"
>> This is followed by: "If so, what language?"
>>
>>
> Personally, I would try this structure:
>
> Do you require a transl
On 4/06/10 2:41 PM, nedlud wrote:
The full questions in the form is "Do you require an interpreter?"
This is followed by: "If so, what language?"
Personally, I would try this structure:
Do you require a translator?
o No
o Yes
[] Greek | {"I require a Greek Translator" written in greek}
not.
Regards,
Mike
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of nedlud
Sent: 04 June 2010 03:30
To: wsg
Subject: [WSG] Yes/No structure?
I have a web form I'm building and there is a simple yes/no question in it.
I got to wonderi
John, thank you for the book recommendation, I was waiting for someone
to quote one, so I don't have to make a new thread :)
Kind regards,
Krystian
>>>
>>> In addition to my thoughts I had a look into the Robert Hoekman Jr
>>> book "Designing the Obvious" and in Chapter 16 about Simplifying Long
Lucien,
Interestingly the Robert Hoekman Jr example I cited started originally
as a paper form. In his write up when the form was first put up online
before he came along it ran to page after page, resulting in people
never completing it!
In your example the first thing that strikes me, but this
Hi Lucien,
In my opinion, this is the best structure for yes/no options:
Do you...?
Yes
No
Cheers,
Greg
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:41 PM, nedlud wrote:
> Hmm.
>
> I hadn't considered the wording of the actual question to be so important.
> But I can sure see your point.
>
> The full questi
Hmm.
I hadn't considered the wording of the actual question to be so important.
But I can sure see your point.
The full questions in the form is "Do you require an interpreter?"
This is followed by: "If so, what language?"
I am porting a paper based for onto the web, and the paper based version
Hi Lucien,
The first thing that occurs to me regarding the semantics of the
action is what is the Yes/No proposition in regards to, and that this
might provide a clearer notion as to what to do.
By this what I mean is, in the first instance so far as semantic mark
up is concerned it would appear
I have a web form I'm building and there is a simple yes/no question in it.
I got to wondering what the best semantic mark up for this is? Does anyone
have any good UI/UX suggestions?
My three ideas were...
Two radio buttons for "yes" and "no"...
Do you...?
Yes
No
A single check box. A tick imp
19 matches
Mail list logo