On 3/17/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi ben,
> one more thing.
> i have a big project on the horizon, i have to reformat this site with
> webstandards
> http://www.donegaldirect.com/
>
> As you can see there is a lot of feeds and lists,
> Would you consider tables for any of the conte
hi ben,
one more thing.
i have a big project on the horizon, i have to reformat this site with
webstandards
http://www.donegaldirect.com/
As you can see there is a lot of feeds and lists,
Would you consider tables for any of the conten on this site?
There are a lot of pages that have content th
No worries. You might find some useful articles at
www.aspnetresources.com. Milan is _the_ man when it comes to ASP.NET
and web standards.
Agreed, Peter. ASP.NET 2.0 is a big step forward in the right direction.
On 3/17/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Peter, and Ben, for great i
Thanks Peter, and Ben, for great insight.
I will try to a collaborative aproach with the developer.
I know that a in a previous situation with another developer we used
repeaters to output standards code,
i would like to be able to stick css possitioning into a form repeater for
him. im not ev
the best of luck in sorting out this
issue.
All the best
Peter Goddard
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
OtterySent: 17 March 2006 10:48To:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] .net
question
Peter Goddard wrote:
--> I would even suggest t
Thanks Ben
ASP.NET 2.0 makes this so much easier!
ATB
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Wong
Sent: 17 March 2006 10:38
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] .net question
On 3/17/06, Peter Goddard <[EMAIL PROTEC
Peter Goddard wrote:--> I would even suggest that you--> consider picking up the basics of aspx page development, not the code,--> but the web controls that are available in .net and see if you can
--> suggest how you can work more closely ...a great informative post Peter.Another vote here for the
On 3/17/06, Peter Goddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm an ASP.NET programmer, so I know. I actually have the reverse
> problem. The designer I work with doesn't have the faintest idea about
> standards and I'm the one cleaning out the layout tables.
>
> Nice one Ben! Sack the designer!
>
Aw
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Wong
Sent: 16 March 2006 23:25
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] .net question
On 3/17/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you would like to see some examples of what im talking about heres
> one of the 1st s
can be of any help please contact me off list.
Peter Goddard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kvnmcwebn
Sent: 16 March 2006 22:03
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] .net question
thanks geoff, i guess thats i will have to be
On 3/17/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> thanks ben,
> ok maybe im overeacting a bit, it gets to me when i spend time doing
> something with css
> then it goes out the window for a table,
No, your not overreacting, I understanding that feeling.
>
> would you just use p's and h's inste
thanks ben,
ok maybe im overeacting a bit, it gets to me when i spend time doing
something with css
then it goes out the window for a table,
would you just use p's and h's instead of the definition list in the middle
column body text?
I dont know about using the table for the special offers
On 3/17/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you would like to see some examples of what im talking about heres one of
> the 1st sites i did with the programmer in question. notice the special
> offers section and the reservations form-when he got it there wasnt a table
> in "site."
> htt
thanks geoff, i guess thats i will have to be level headed in my aproach.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
kvnmcwebn wrote:
hello,
i just went to a lot of trouble style a form, fieldsets, legends and
all.
The visual studio programmer whos taking over the next phase says it
will be coverted into tables.
"we can't control database content all we can do is contain it"
that was his argument. wh
adam wrote:
Perhaps you should encourage some development of a collection of base
controls for your development team?
yes i will make a case for this,
any suggestions for my arguments???
basically need to sell the project manager who is cool but only concerned
with
the bottom line. The devel
Rachel
Yes the comments have been helpful, basically confirming my suspicions.
If you would like to see some examples of what im talking about heres one of
the 1st sites i did with the programmer in question. notice the special
offers section and the reservations form-when he got it there wasnt
Friday, 17 March 2006 9:22 a.m.
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] .net question
Hi Kevin,
If you have already created the html and css for the form, then the
developer should have no trouble fitting your structure into the .net
framework (we do it ever day here!).
It sounds like h
On 3/16/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
>
> i just went to a lot of trouble style a form, fieldsets, legends and all.
>
> The visual studio programmer whos taking over the next phase says it will be
> coverted into tables.
>
> "we can't control database content all we can do is c
Hi Kevin,
If you have already created the html and css for the form, then the
developer should have no trouble fitting your structure into the .net
framework (we do it ever day here!).
It sounds like he wants to use the default pre-made controls for it? Which
is unfortunately how a lot of .net d
I'm no .net developer however if he uses the WSYWIG to build the
webform then yes this is true, however I'm sure that if he uses the
editor he will be able to code the elements manually using from the
story boards you have no doubt produced.
Daz
On 16/03/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "we can't control database content all we can do is contain it"
>
> that was his argument. why cant he contain it with css.
> can somebody help me educate him?
Not sure how he'll take it, but showing him how the placeholders are
already there for his content, through an example, might work.
Aft
22 matches
Mail list logo
