What is the guideline or specification for audio frequency signal
attenuation outside of the 50Hz (plus and minus 25 Hz from centre) band
width?
For example, signal should be x dB below carrier, at frequency plus and
minus 50 Hz from centre?
73 Simon VR2UKQ
___
Bill,Sorry, I mispoke, I was typing what I thought I remembered in email client & not looking at File>Settings. What I seem to have broken is Settings>General "Disable TX after sending 73" is unchecked yet it always disables TX after RR73, and I had missed unchecking the box in Reporting tab.I know
On 07/12/2018 01:30, Bill Mullin wrote:
I don't think I need them . . . do I?
Hi Bill,
the files can be very useful when issues occur, for example if your
WSJT-X crashed every time a decode was supposed to happen then a saved
.WAV file might have a clue that would help the team fix a problem
I posted this with the FT8-digital-mode group but was not able to find a
fix to the problem.
Looking in the folder C:\Users\*\AppData\Local\WSJT-X\Save, I found
100's of .WAV files. I realize that they can be deleted from the WSJT-X
File menu, but is there any way I can simply tell the pr
Bill,As I think some others have been reporting, the unchecking of "Clear DX call and grid after logging" seems to be broken on my Windows version of rc5. Mine is unchecked, yet it continues to clear the DX call and grid, jump to TX6, and toggle TX Enable off whenever mine sends RR73. This has been
On 06/12/2018 17:26, Stephen Taylor - K6SJT wrote:
I think I recall from last year if the I placed a check mark in the 'Call
1st' box the program would move down to Tx6 CQ at the end of a contact, BUT
if the box was NOT CHECKED the Auto seq would remain on the Tx5 73 and NOT
ADVANCE to Tx6. The a
Speaking of sticky
I would love to have the TX4 "RRR" vs "RR73" be sticky, when changing bands or
closing and re-opening the program.
I almost always use RR73.
Tnx,
Shel KF0UR
Original message From: Gary McDuffie Date:
12/6/18 3:28 PM (GMT-07:00) To: step...@k6sjt.c
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 10:26, Stephen Taylor - K6SJT wrote:
>
> Bill, because I operate >95% of the time Responding to CQs, not Sending CQs,
> I would like some way to have the Tx 4 and/or Tx 5 remain in place (sticky)
> at the end of each contact rather than advancing to Tx 6 CQ.
I would echo
Thanks, Joe! Good info.
Andrew NO6E
Sent from BlueMail
On Dec 6, 2018, 09:22, at 09:22, Joe Taylor wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>A number of comments and questions have appeared here recently
>concerning the parameter DT displayed by the WSJT-X decoders.
>
>K6AVP:
>> Only a few have posted what range of
Thanks, Bill. I read the Quick Start Guide too fast and didn't catch that.
It makes sense.
73,
Shel KF0UR
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 1:41 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.0.0-rc5
Hi Joe,
Tnx for the quick reply. That explains it. I'll stay on 2.0 after GA.
And tnx for the QSOs...FT8 and otherwise. My log tells me we go back to
1999 on SSB.
Having been using FT8 for over a year (11k QSOs), I've had the opportunity
to do a number of presentations to clubs here in Color
On 06/12/2018 20:30, Shel KF0UR wrote:
When re-opened, all of the colors are now missing (see screenshot
below), and I have to click on “Reset Highlighting” to restore the
original colors. I was able to repeat this multiple times.
I’m running on a PC, Windows 10. Version 1.9.1 is also in
Hi Shel,
If you are going back and forth between 1.9.1 and 2.0-rc5, that is
expected behavior. Use of 1.9.1 will erase your colors saved from v2.0
and require you to reset.
After GA is available, next week, don't use v1.9.1 any more!
-- Joe, K1JT
On 12/6/2018 3:30 PM, Shel KF0UR wr
Hi,
I just downloaded and started using the subject release and came up with one
issue having to do with Colors.
I changed the "my call" color just a little, unchecked a few boxes, and
saved it. That worked fine. I then closed the WSJT-X program.
When re-opened, all of the colors are
Hi Simon,
comments in line below.
On 06/12/2018 17:40, Simon wrote:
Thanks for pointing out the MessageAggregator demo code. We looked at
Decodesmodel.cpp and our one simple line of needed data is as below:
1. May be easier to use QT, instead of Microsoft and needing to port a
lot of 'QT thing
To summarize isn't it safe to say:
"As long most of your DT times are less than 1 second you will be able to
decode everybody else who is less than +/-1 second. WSJT-X allows 2.5 seconds
of difference so if both sides are off by 1 second in opposite directions that
would be 2 seconds of DT and
Hi Bill,
Thanks for pointing out the MessageAggregator demo code. We looked at
Decodesmodel.cpp and our one simple line of needed data is as below:
1. May be easier to use QT, instead of Microsoft and needing to port a
lot of 'QT things which I never used before' to Microsoft environment.
2. Whi
Hello Bill Somerville,
I've read through many posts over the last couple months on both the
Developer Forum & WSJT-X Group and I've see comments & requests to have Tx4
or Tx5 stay sticky and not move to the Tx6 CQ when operating in the
responder versus caller (CQ) mode.
I think I recall from last
Hello Wolfgang,
For a recently downloaded, version 5.31.331.0 Copyright 1996 to 2003,
run on Window 7,
on the advanced setting, there are two radio buttons, to use a single
server or "Automatically pick a new server for each sync".
On my machine, sometime it reports, at bottom of screen in grey
Hi all,
A number of comments and questions have appeared here recently
concerning the parameter DT displayed by the WSJT-X decoders.
K6AVP:
Only a few have posted what range of DT’s they mostly see ...
K9YC:
My memory is routinely seeing DTs in the range of +/_ 200msec, with occasional
ou
Hello, Bill,
thank you for your hint.
I do not remember to have used F2 to configure.
I was rather on qrz.com to look for the qsl info.
I will think of it at the next occurance ...
73
Wolfgang
OE1WWL
> On 06/12/2018 10:57, Wagner Wolfgang OE1WWL wrote:
>> Does anybody have an idea, why my frequen
With 1.9.1 I saw a range of +/- 0.2-s. With rc5 I am seeing 0 to +0.35 and
no -. I understand that this is caused by a bug that will be fixed when
2.0.0 is released.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:36 AM George J. Molnar wrote:
> Thanks John!
>
> There is nothing to be gained by tweaking the last milli
On 06/12/2018 15:26, ai...@use.startmail.com wrote:
I occasionally have this happen as well. I am reasonably certain that
getting RF onto my CAT cable is the root cause, but have not had time
to troubleshoot as yet. Are you interested in recreation steps from
anyone having the same issue?
Hi
Thanks John!
There is nothing to be gained by tweaking the last milliseconds out of timing.
Sure, it looks pretty and appeals to the perfectionist in us, but as long as it
-WORKS- call it good and have some fun.
George J Molnar
KF2T, Arlington, Virginia, USA
Please note my new email: geo...
I occasionally have this happen as well. I am reasonably certain that
getting RF onto my CAT cable is the root cause, but have not had time
to troubleshoot as yet. Are you interested in recreation steps from
anyone having the same issue?
On Thursday, December 6, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Bill Somervil
Hello Simon,
Thursday, December 6, 2018, 3:38:45 PM, you wrote:
> The Dimension 4 i download recently uses, in dafault list, dozens
> of ntp server, one after the next.
this is exactly the point: D4 lists many server, but for time sync it
is using just one of them. And this can be a problem - no
Al,
I think the key question is are you otherwise getting satisfactory
performance? Are you making Q's? This subject is starting to take on the
tenor of the never ending quest for a 1:1 SWR. And as we used to like to
say, "If the SWR is less than 10:1, call 'CQ'!"
John
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at
The Dimension 4 i download recently uses, in dafault list, dozens of ntp
server, one after the next.
The original official ntpd on unix use multiple ntp server and "average"
them out, i believe
73
Simon
On Thursday, December 6, 2018, Wolfgang wrote:
>
> Relying on just one ntp server in Windo
Whew. Thanks George. At least its not just me.
☺
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018, 9:16 AM WB5JJJ It seems that after each test of the FT8 RU, I am one of "These guys".
> Not used to having switched operational modes, so I'll send our 4 or 5 CQ
> RU's before I realize that I'm not calling RUssia or doing the
On 06/12/2018 10:57, Wagner Wolfgang OE1WWL wrote:
Does anybody have an idea, why my frequency is reset to one of the
standard value?
Thanks in advance
Wolfgang OE1WWL
HI Wolfgang,
there is a known restriction that entering and leaving the Settings
window will reset to the first saved working
Hi, everybody, dear OM!
Sometimes the frequency of my transceiver is inadvertantly set to a
standard value.
Yesterday I called cq on 14.074800 with 1500 Hz offset.
UR4MQG called me and I worked him.
Then R6AV called me. Either I double clicked him or I enabled Tx.
No answer. Later I realized that t
On 12/5/2018 7:00 PM, Al Pawlowski wrote:
Only a few have posted what range of DT’s they mostly see
My most recent experience is with 1.9, and on 6M from the summer. My
memory is routinely seeing DTs in the range of +/_ 200msec, with
occasional outliers up to 2 sec or so. My sound card is a T
Relying on just one ntp server in Windows requires a net connection
with absolute no glitches. ntp time adjust needs the same delay
for up- and download on the internet connection to do a perfect sync.
I had been asked by local OM to support him. 'Sometimes' his clock
was off by 1,5 to 2,5 secon
33 matches
Mail list logo
