have screenshots of the JTSDK-QT windows at that point,
and also have the CMakeoutput log if that would help troubleshoot.
73
Charlie G3WDG
--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-
again
73
Charlie
> Hi Charlie,
>
> As you mentioned Omni-Rig I think you refer to windows.
>
> the guide is not updated, read the follow:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jtsdk/files/win32/README.txt/download
>
> the notes are in the follow messages:
> http://sourceforg
see any errors while the
build was happening. Omnirig was present, from my previous instal of the
old software.
I am happy to start again from the beginning if needed!
73
Charlie
> Hi Charlie,
>
> As you mentioned Omni-Rig I think you refer to windows.
>
> the guide is n
Hi Greg and Michael
Thanks - what would have happened if the VC-Redist was not there?
Understand now how to build the package.
73
Charlie
> Hi Charlie,
>
> With respect to VC-Redist, as long as it is installed, you should be ok.
>
> To build a the Win32 installer, use the pack
ogram start dial frequency is red and rig does not seem
to get commands, requiring a TEST CAT before it works. I have not found a
way of reproducing this however.
Ch
mit is likewise unresponsive?
Charlie
> Hi Bill,
>
> We know that some rigs won't accept commands to change frequency while
> transmitting. What we were calling "the FT-817 problem" is only a
> programming issue in the way I implemented Doppler control in WSJT-X.
Hi Joe
Thanks for these. I should be able to try some tests tonight.
I guess we could reset PC clock and go back and look at some of our past
examples with 5499 also.
Charlie
> Hi Charlie, Rex, and all,
>
> I have posted Windows installation files for two recent builds of WSJT-X:
Hi John
There is a sub-mode setting control on main window just to the right of
the clock.
73
Charlie
> Hi Joe,
>
> How do I select JT65B on v1.6? The default is JT65A and it is not clear
> how to change this...Inserting a new frequency offers a choice of "JT65"
> o
Hi Joe
Works fine, thanks! Checked over a 20dB range and seems very accurate.
For a given slider position, I believe the level is higher now than it was
previously.
73
Charlie
> Hi Bill and all,
>
> FYI: While echo-testing with his 10 GHz EME setup, Charlie (G3WDG)
> discovered t
Charlie
> On 11/06/2015 05:50, Charles Suckling wrote:
>> Hi Bill
> Hi Charlie,
>>
>> Just to be clear, is the function of the Enable TX and Halt TX in 1.6.0
>> supposed to be as described in the 1.6.0 User Guide:
>>
>> " Tx toggles the
this unfortunately - I was more interested in
trying out Echo mode at the time.
The Vista is set to normal size display font also, not the larger option.
73
Charlie
> What size font did you use and what OS are you on? I tried Courier 14,16,
> and 18 Bold and they all lined up fine on Window
Hi Mike
Thanks, I'll take a look at this.
Charlie
> Did you use Courier? You may want to try Courier New and see if it
> behaves
> the same.
> Go into Control Panel/Fonts and look at your Courier Font.
> On my Windows 7 I see Microsoft Corp as the Designer/foundry. I w
Recent ones and certainly r5586, have the bad behaviour.
There is one release I have that has different behaviour on the two
computers - if that is of interest I will try to identify which version
that is.
73
Charlie
Hi Joe
Noted on copying the whole group.
I did not realise that this had been changed deliberately.
It just surprised me that the radio jumped frequency when switching off
Doppler. Guess this is personal choice really, but it came as an
unintended consequence.
73
Charlie
> Hi Char
r a touch on the radio's dial, or reselecting the band
usually return it to normal.
Would be grateful if someone could shed some light on the significance or
otherwise of this, please, or put it another way do we need to worry?
73
Hi Bill
Thanks. Will take a look tomorrow.
73
Charlie
> On 12/06/2015 16:04, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Joe & All,
>> Hi Charlie, Rex, and all,
>>
>> I'm copying this response to the wsjt-devel list, since that's where it
>> really belongs.
>>
rogue"
machine the quality number is lower.
The same settings have been used on all machines, and the station with the
odd result has two other PCs that decode with the same result that VK7MO
and I get.
This is happening with JT4F mode.
73
Cha
Thanks, Mike. I have forwarded your suggestions on.
73
Charlie
> Sounds like that one machine may have floating point problems.
>
> Intel has a CPU test suite
> http://download.intel.com/support/processors/sb/theintelprocessordiagnostict
> oolinwindowsuserguider.pdf
>
> A
station callsign has been entered in main
window.
73
Charlie
--
Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
network devices and physical
Hi Mike
As you note, CALL3.TXT is not installed with a standard build.
We only found this as someone copied the file from a previous installation
of WSJT10 into the AppData -> Local-> WSJT-X folder.
73
Charlie
> It doesn't look like deep4.f90 is instrumented for timer.
Hi All
Another very basic question.
Trying to build WSJT using JTSDK-PY. I did an update on JTSDK v2.0 and
then tried to build (package). Got an error python33.dll missing shortly
after starting.
Any help much appreciated.
73
Charlie
Hi Greg
The missing python33.dll came up shortly after starting the build process
and the build did not complete.
73
Charlie
> Hi Charlie,
>
> First, after running build-wsjt package, and before installing WSJT with
> the installer, check to see if python33.dll in
> C:\JTSDK\w
Hi Greg
That worked perfectly, thanks. The .dll files were there and the build
went fine. Very fast compared to -X.
I think my mistake was to use the JTSDK Update in Start > Program > JTSDK
rather than following the route below, which perhaps resulted in no
"Upgrade" step.
73
eported in wsjtgroup.
73
Charlie
--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on g
.
Save option is Save all.
Program in Monitor mode.
73
Charlie
> On 03/07/2015 10:46, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I saw a message on the wsjtgroup digest just now relating to file I/O.
>>
>> I think I have seen an issue, wit
Thanks, Bill
> On 03/07/2015 11:52, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
>> Hi Bill
> Hi Charlie,
>>
>>
>> I just ran a test, on Windows 7 machine.
>>
>> WSJT-X started up at 1042 + something, it analysed and displayed 1043
>> and
&
G, line 2 with MinW at F.
I am sending you directly a decodable mode G off air file in case you
need one.
Charlie
> Hi Rex,
>
> Thanks for catching and reporting this bug. I'm not presently at a
> location where it's convenient to generate test files. Could you send
&g
shows x/30 not x/60 and program runs with 30s
periods not 60.
Closing and restarting the program from JT9 brings back correct operation
with 60s.
Charlie
> For those interested in the rapidly developing fast modes in WSJT-X: I
> have (temporarily?) stored two relevant documents at SourceForg
Hi Bill
Thanks for this mod.
I have a need for this also, with a homebuilt CI/V interface that up to
now has needed to run on external power.
73
Charlie
> On 09/09/2015 13:40, Joe Taylor wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
> Hi Joe,
>>
>> Thanks for doing the new DTR/RTS arrang
control errors, but can't
properly use it for EME!
73
Charlie
> Hi Rex,
>
> Many thanks for your helpful comments on code revision 5865.
>
> VK7MO wrote:
>
>> Some feedback on r5865. Some of this might be in the "cleaning up
>> category"
>> t
is is now all clear and thanks for
explaining what was happening.
Also agreed the single tone echo tests are extremely useful.
73
Charlie
> Hi Charlie,
>
> G3WDG wrote:
>
>> With Doppler control off, and Split set to none, the [fast JT9] tones
>> are indeed on
>> th
Hi Jay
I have similar behaviour with earlier release when using a type 1
compound callsign (My Call).
In that case QSO partner was only sending my call and his call following
the procedure, and program then jumped to TX3 instead of TX2
73
Charlie G3WDG
> I am having an issue with the a
Charlie G3WDG
--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
message formats per the user guide.
I also noticed that clicking on decoded messages to generate the report
automatically, the TX3 message (R + report) was incorrectly selected and
TX2 had to be manually selected.
73
Charlie
Hi Bill
Pse find attached the all.txt for the QSO.
73
Charlie
> On 12/11/2015 05:37, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
>> I also noticed that clicking on decoded messages to generate the report
>> automatically, the TX3 message (R + report) was incorrectly sele
Hi Bill
Many thanks for your explanation. I have seen this happen as you say if
the other station omits their grid.
We do make use of the extra fields from time to time so it would better if
they stay.
73
Charlie
> On 12/11/2015 13:14, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
&g
Hi Joe
Some more inputs:
1.1 New in 1.6
Could mention that JT4 decoder in -X is more sensitive than in WSJT10,and
averaging is automated
3.1 Windows
C:\Users\\AppData\Local\WSJT-X may in some PCs be in a hidden
folder and users have to unhide it.
Can Dimension4 also be recommended for time
Hi Joe
Some more comments/suggestions below for the user guide.
Charlie
4.2 Force Control Lines: . sure they are needed ..add: (for example to
power the radio serial interface)
8.1. VHF Setup : section name could read 'VHF and Up Setup'
15 Protocol specifications - add sect
then back to JT4 it has text in relating to JT9.
With 1.6.1 this box is not there in JT4 mode.
Charlie--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https
Hi Joe
Further to last, my webmail is playing up again with empty attachments.
Below is link to the figure
Charlie
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B116IwQIUFNTYUZfQWw3UjNQeFk/view?usp=sharing
Thanks, Joe.
Charlie> Hi Charlie,
>
> Thanks, I was aware of the presence of the (unused) control that you
> highlight. In v1.6.0 we "grayed out" several controls when they are
> inactive, but did not make them invisible. In v1.6.1 I started making
> them invisible i
Hi Greg
Many thanks - build of 1.7.0 works fine now.
73
Charlie G3WDG
> Hello All,
>
> I've received several questions about setting up Asciidoctor for use
> with JTSDK-Win32. The following is a recap on getting things in order.
>
> * There are (3) steps requi
Hi Joe
r6169 is OK. Haven't built any since.
Charlie
> Hi Bill and all,
>
> I've noticed recently that invoking "Help | Online User Guide" from
> within WSJT-X v1.7 incorrectly sends one's browser to
> http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsj
.
I seem to need to amplify the jt65sim files (by about 27) to get the
spectrum to be visible on WSJT10.
I have done this manually so far for one file to enable the comparison.
73
Charlie
If you are able to sample the same signal with both WSJT
> and WSJT-X and record .WAV files from b
Hi Steve
Thanks.
I just ran a -1 simulated signal through X and 10. X decodes with -1
while 10 reported -7.
Charlie
> Hi Charlie,
>
>> Does anyone know how to batch process a number of files (in Audacity or
>> something else) to a) amplify them and b) convert from 12000 to
ble?
I was not successful in changing to 1000Hz base frequency by adding -F
1000 to the command line. Maybe I'm not using the correct command?
Charlie
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world&
this is a feature designed to help a Hound who has forgotten
to enter Hound, when already listening for an intended Fox.
After pressing OK to this warning, it decodes as if set to Hound, but
Hound does not appear checked in the Advanced settings window.
73
Charlie G3WDG
> Something interest
Hi Mike
Its the CQ.
See User Guide sect 12.1. Table 1 refers to FT8.
73
Charlie
> How did CQ W9HT EN71 get tagged a1? It was the 1st time seeing him after
> the 73 at 044600.There was no apriori information that I can see
> here1.9.0-rc2 r8543
>
>
>
Hi Peter
One option might be to arrange PTT via a serial port to the mic PTT line
and not have to use CAT, in which case the Rig to 'None' would work.
I have heard of one other request for what you are asking, from OZ1LPR,
for much the same reasons.
73
Charlie G3WDG
&
to
different frequencies (so as to be able to simulate a non CAT station, eg
someone using WSJT10) one of the VFOs would still get reset by the
program unexpectedly. This behaviour prevented us from carrying out the
test.
He also could not use the Rig at None, as he used PTT via CAT.
73
Charlie
Hi All
I just had a comment from a user not on this list that when stretching or
resizing widegraph the data already written to it is lost.
I can't recall whether this has always been the case or is the result of a
recent change.
73
Charlie
Thanks, Joe
Will pass that on.
Charlie
> This has always been the case, and it's for good reasons.
>
> -- Joe, K1JT
>
> On 3/30/2018 1:10 PM, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I just had a comment from a user not o
Hi Conrad
Which version of WSJT-X are you referring to? There were some
improvements made relatively recently to improve the waterfall visibility
on very weak signals, which are in the beta release of 1.9.0.
73
Charlie
> I am a very active user of JT65 on EME. The visibility of weak s
1000Hz.
I had Save all on for the entire test. Available for a few days if needed.
73
Charlie
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm
(in my case c:/Users/User/AppData/
Local/WSJT-X/save.
I don't know why the cannot find path specified warning appeared.
73
Charlie G3WDG
> Hi:
>
> After the fun of about a thousand Qs and switching to 1.9, I started to
> get the "cannot find path specified" error messag
Hi Roger
I confirm your findings.
73
Charlie G3WDG
> Here I find the following:
>
> When jt49sim is commanded to produce a jt4 wave file it produces a jt9
> wave file, e.g. the command:
>
> jt49sim "K1ABC W9XYZ EN37" 4C 1 0.0 0.0 1 -15
>
> produces a JT9C wave
but not sure what.
73
Charlie
> On 23/05/2018 01:01, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> I am moving around the files in the SF subversion repository to a more
>> logical layout.
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have now completed the rearrangement by moving the WSJT-X sources to a
> se
Hi Bill
Done - screenshots here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-ZYqPCEN2Nnc497P2t3_pRmkjm-HxyZD?usp=sharing
Is there any way of copying the contents of a command window to save
taking screenshots?
73
Charlie
> On 27/05/2018 14:16, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wr
ith no problems.
73
Charlie
> Hi Sandro,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. While version issue is definably a bug, I don't
> think it falls into the category of critical. The version information has
> no
> effect on WSJT-X final code whatsoever; mainly screen displays and folder
&
Hi Dani
Yes, what you are seeing is normal behaviour and has been so for some time.
Can't answer the question about tone spacing.
73
Charlie G3WDG
> Hi all,
>
> I've been testing the JT4G decoder in WSJT-X 1.9.1 together with Wei
> Mingchuan BG2BHC, since this is the
Joe
I think there has been confusion in the ranks from two different
instructions to hounds.
Baker's website says to click a decode, and your instructions clearly
state to put the full expedition call into the DX box.
I followed your instructions.
Ch
Hi Courtney
Are you using the latest public release?
This behaviour is known.
Suggest you try with averaging off (decode tab) and set sync to -1
(mainwindow).
73
Charlie G3WDG
> I just made my first JT65C EME contact (1296) using WJST-X newly installed
> on a new Windows 10 PC
>
:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_5kF29vnvZx91onxfjlnnPIFS1MfPVbE/view?usp=sharing
73
Charlie
> Hi Charlie,
>
> Yes, this is the latest release. Just downloaded Friday.
>
> I've set averaging off and sync to -1. Will let you know of this or other
> anomalies.
>
> Tha
/110Xk_hleOnJ_5wkJrvvM0UM8Fei6XR92?usp=sharing
73
Charlie
> OK I've set agressive decoding to 1 from 0.
>
> So it doesn't matter how I have deep search and enable AP and enable
> averaging set?
>
> Courtney
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 2:55 PM
> wrote:
>
>>
Jack
Do you happen to have any RIT applied to the rig?
73
Charlie G3WDG
> Rig: Ftdx500o
>
> Setup:
> Windows 10
> Signalink
> WSJT-X v1.9.1 r8747 with settings as shown in the FT8 DXpedition Mode User
> Guide, May 18, 2018.
>
> Several months ago I tried WSJT-X FT8
Tom
Yes, you are correct.
The latest version in the public repository for those who build themselves
is 1.9.2-devel (r45427a).
73
Charlie G3WDG
> Very interesting review. One question: You mention version 1.9.2. The
> lates general release is 1.9.1, isn't it?
>
> 73de OH6VDA
Neil
I believe that 1.9.2 blocks fox and hound from transmitting on the wrong
period, and also there was a correction to Doppler control for rigs that
cannot accept CAT commands while Txing.
Charlie
> Many people build their own version, if you build WSJT-X right now,
> you'l
eans of testing the new features
- hope the testing goes well.
Charlie
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
/Microwave features is checked.
73
Charlie G3WDG
> Thanks August,
>
> I have just checked v1.9.1 an there is no âAuto Seqâ and âCall
> 1stâ there either. I must have just got so used to it on FT8 that I
> expected it to be on JT [Smile]
> It would be a nice addition to
ES5PC -20f
1421 -40 2.1 1857 $* HA/G3WDG ES5PC f
1423 -40 2.3 1853 $* HA/G3WDG ES5PC f
Files are here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1QPq81EA9sg-lkefzAb0ThUfELFJ1XtWK?usp=sharing
73
Charlie
___
wsjt-devel mailing
$* HA/G3WDG ES5PC f
1423 -4 2.3 1855 $* HA/G3WDG ES5PC f
73
Charlie
> Hi Bill
>
> With rc2 I can now decode JT4F messages with RX Freq ~1850Hz with
> numerical reports (instead of as was the case with rc1).
>
> However the reports are pessimistic:
>
be to have Auto Log available generally, with
perhaps a brief notification that QSO had been logged.
Charlie
> A third candidate release ("RC3") of WSJT-X 2.0 is now available for
> download and use by beta testers.
>
> Changes in RC3 relative to RC2 include the following
Bill
Seeing it every time I start program on Win 7 64b.
Not seeing it with Vista 32.
73
Charlie
> On 17/10/2018 16:51, Chuck Furman wrote:
>> I'm seeing the same LoTW message like others are seeing:
>>
> Hi All,
>
> can those of you seeing the LotW Users Data
Hi John
This is a known problem. There was some message traffic about this here a
day or two ago.
Bill's solution (as a temporary workaround) is to double click 'TX1 now'
button which disables it and forces you to send from TX2. There is a tool
tip associated with this butto
Hi All
A new world record for 10GHz EME was achieved on Thursday using QRA64D,
from the UK to New Zealand. Many thanks to Nico, Joe and the team for a
wonderful mode!
73
Charlie G3WDG
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
station acts as a temporary beacon for more
than 5 minutes.
73
Charlie G3WDG
> When I made some meteor scatter contacts on 222 MHz using FSK441 I recall
> leaving the radio and computer running for hours at a time. I'm doubtful
> those qso's would have been completed if the o
.
Is this intentional - if so then a strong plea to return this
functionality!
Charlie
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
viour
(successfully), on closing program and restarting with rc5 the waterfall
still has the appearance of the mode jump.
So far, my rc5 is now stuck like this.
Any thoughts?
Charlie
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi Joe
More on this.
On closing and restarting rc5 after 1.9.1 has mode jumped, as noted below
rc5 waterfall has the appearance of mode having jumped.
If I then close and start 1.9.1, the waterfall is normal.
On then closing 1.9.1 and restarting rc5 the waterfall is normal.
Charlie
> Hi
Hi Jari
Did you start rc5 after getting a mode jump to JT9 with 1.9.1?
That is the only way I have found so far to see the effects of a mode jump
with rc5.
I posted some findings on this a few messages ago.
73
Charlie G3WDG
> Windows 7 64 bit
>
> JT65 errors:
>
> Double click
Thanks, Jari
Sounds like this is a different issue to what I was reporting.
73
Charlie
> Hi Charlie, others
>
> No, I work several qsos with RC5 on FT8, then got silent with FT8, so I
> change to JT65 as I saw traffic on it.
>
> I also note, that after I change from JT65 to
Just wondering what the TX # spinner is used for (located to right of RX
freq combo box) on mainwindow GUI?
Charlie
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
180845
station called me 180900 with report
autoseq replied 180915 with report not R report
same at 180945
manually selected TX3 at 180954
Did I make a newbie error?
Charlie
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https
received our initial RR73 message. On some occasions we needed to do this
several times during more difficult QSOs.
73
Charlie G3WDG
>
> I have noticed a specific scenario that has happened several times during
> the contest. This happens when I have called a CQing station two or three
>
Hi Joe
Minor typo:
IMproved support for compound and nonstandard callsigns
Charlie
> Hi all,
>
> I have posted what I'm calling a "minimally acceptable" WSJT-X 2.0 User
> Guide on the WSJT web site:
>
> http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-d
Laurie
Are you referring to FT8 or some other mode?
If FT8, this is expected as as your stored wave files would be
incompatible with the 77 bit decoder in the latest release candidates.
Charlie G3WDG
> Since rc4, opening previously saved wave files are no longer showing
> decodes. Ther
Cntrl F will find it - also useful for searching for something specific
>
>
>> On Dec 4, 2018, at 14:54, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk
>> wrote:
>>
>> Minor typo:
>>
>> IMproved support for compound and nonstandard callsigns
>
> Iâm sure it would help to tell where the error is locate
within predescribed range to avoid harmonics of audio
being transmitted.
4. In 1.2. Documentation Conventions could perhaps add use of CTRL-F to
search for particular items of interest
Charlie
> Hi all,
>
> I have posted what I'm calling a "minimally acceptable" WSJT-X 2.0
thus reducing the chance of QSO
partner decoding it.
The current behaviour seems to be at odds with having Disable TX after 73
unchecked. Accept that RR73 is not 73 of course, but the issue is the
same for contest operating.
Charlie
> Bill,As I think some others have been
> reportin
Bill
If deep search is engaged, does it look through call3.txt randomly, or
start for example at the most recent entry?
Charlie
> Hi Russ,
>
> some comments in line. BTW I don't operate EME so these are based on
> looking at the source code alone.
>
> On 15/12/2018 00
u included JT65 into WSJT-X.
Charlie
> Hi Charlie,
>
> On 12/15/2018 12:38, G3WDG wrote:
>> If deep search is engaged, does it look through call3.txt randomly, or
>> start for example at the most recent entry?
>
> Deep Search uses whatever is saved in CALL3.TXT. There
I had a brief look at the first 95 stations in FT8 Roundup results,
comparing raw to adjudicated scores.
The failed QSO rate is about 9%.
Best was 0.3% , average 9.1% and worst 41.7%.
HNY to all!
Charlie G3WDG
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt
Hi Joe
Back home now and with Greg's help have built r6563 and forwarded it to Rex.
I see the facility to add noise to wave files recordings is no longer
there. Is that correct?
Charlie
> Hi Rex,
>
> VK7MO wrote:
>> I note that your conclusion that JT65c is no
>
Hi Joe
Thanks - I have exactly the same. What's missing is the experienced based
decoding options, compared to the last one I saw.
My mistake - sri for confusion.
Charlie
> Hi Charlie,
>
>> Back home now and with Greg's help have built r6563 and forwarded it to
&
). Decode appeared to remain lit.
Charlie
PS I will now read the instructions.
> Hi Charlie,
>
>> Thanks - I have exactly the same. What's missing is the experienced
>> based
>> decoding options, compared to the last one I saw.
>
> Yes, but those options did n
e messages containing
calls+reports or calls+RRR decode with averaging with f.
Running other settings per your recommendations, and no false decodes seen
(other than the "dragging" average).
Charlie
> As things now stand, you need to click "Clear Avg" to start a new
> averag
ailed totally and (at the moment) have no
more time to spend on it.
73
Charlie
> Hi All,
>
> I have just committed a bunch of changes that I have been working on for
> some time. Some are potentially disruptive and I welcome any testing of
> rig control using the various modes. For those
Win7 installation is still working great.
73
Charlie
> On 06/04/2016 19:11, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote:
>> Does this mean that if I build with JTSDK now, the program will include
>> your latest changes?
>>
>> How do I as a JTSDK user updat
number of attempts before getting it
to work.
I will forward the svn switch command if you don't have it (its on another
PC).
73
Charlie G3WDG
> On Win 7 32 bits, after update/upgrade, the JTSDK-QT window closes
> immediately after started. I've uninstalled and reins
Hi Joe
Just bringing back to the discussion for consideration the issues I found
with using a Type 1 callsign when operating as HA/G3WDG on 3cm JT4:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B116IwQIUFNTWXhsdUVfVW16S00/view?usp=sharing
Charlie
> Hi Joe
>
> A few more items if you are able to
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
