Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:37 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:17:07 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have now a preliminary patch for adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-ppc-
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:37 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> >> Benjamin Zores wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:17:07 +0100
> >>> Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> I have now a preliminary patch for adeos-ipipe-2.6.1
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:09:38 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately, "generic" applies only to the Linux part. I realized,
that the new IPIPE support for the genirqs requires even more
arch-specific modifications than the old interface :-( on P
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:17:07 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have now a preliminary patch for adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-ppc-1.5-00. The
porting was rather straight-forward, as the ppc tree does not use the
new
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Benjamin Zores wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:17:07 +0100
>> Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I have now a preliminary patch for adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-ppc-1.5-00. The
>>> porting was rather straight-forward, as the ppc tree does not use the
>>> new "
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:09:38 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, "generic" applies only to the Linux part. I realized,
> that the new IPIPE support for the genirqs requires even more
> arch-specific modifications than the old interface :-( on PowerPC.
That's pr
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:17:07 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have now a preliminary patch for adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-ppc-1.5-00. The
porting was rather straight-forward, as the ppc tree does not use the
new "genirq" interface, in contrast to the powerpc
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:17:07 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have now a preliminary patch for adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-ppc-1.5-00. The
> porting was rather straight-forward, as the ppc tree does not use the
> new "genirq" interface, in contrast to the powerpc tree (that's what
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:11:23 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:21:25 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I hack a bit my patch to make it compile and the kernel already booted.
Though
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 18:37 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:36 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 23:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 18:37 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:36 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> >> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 23:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:19 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrot
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:36 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 23:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:19 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Anyway, there is an unreleased work-in-progress patch for x86 over -rc6
by P
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:36 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 23:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:19 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>
> >>> Anyway, there is an unreleased work-in-progress patch for x86 over -rc6
> >>> by Ph
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 23:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:19 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Anyway, there is an unreleased work-in-progress patch for x86 over -rc6
by Philippe. I recently had the chance to test it and hack a bit on the
SMP IO-APIC part.
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 23:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:19 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> > Anyway, there is an unreleased work-in-progress patch for x86 over -rc6
> > by Philippe. I recently had the chance to test it and hack a bit on the
> > SMP IO-APIC part. It seems t
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:19 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Anyway, there is an unreleased work-in-progress patch for x86 over -rc6
> by Philippe. I recently had the chance to test it and hack a bit on the
> SMP IO-APIC part. It seems to work fine under UP, but SMP had some
> issues that are identified
Paul wrote:
> On Thursday 30 November 2006 13:19, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe, I know you are very busy, but shouldn't we make a pre-release
>> available already, also to discuss further how to deal best with genirq
>> on other platforms beyond x86?
>
> I have an x86_64 box waiting for a Xenomai
On Thursday 30 November 2006 13:19, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe, I know you are very busy, but shouldn't we make a pre-release
> available already, also to discuss further how to deal best with genirq
> on other platforms beyond x86?
I have an x86_64 box waiting for a Xenomai port - I don't see
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Benjamin Zores wrote:
>>> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:11:23 +0100
>>> Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Benjamin Zores wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:21:25 +0100
> Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:11:23 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:21:25 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I hack a bit my patch to make it compile and the kernel already booted.
Though
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:11:23 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:21:25 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I hack a bit my patch to make it compile and the kernel alr
Benjamin Zores wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:11:23 +0100
> Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Benjamin Zores wrote:
>>> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:21:25 +0100
>>> Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
> Well, I hack a bit my patch to make it compile and the kernel a
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:11:23 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benjamin Zores wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:21:25 +0100
> > Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>> Well, I hack a bit my patch to make it compile and the kernel already
> >>> booted.
> >>>
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:21:25 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I hack a bit my patch to make it compile and the kernel already booted.
Though it hangs when loading the SATA driver.
I have no idea why atm.
Problems with IRQs?
Probably, as when un
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:21:25 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, I hack a bit my patch to make it compile and the kernel already
> > booted.
> > Though it hangs when loading the SATA driver.
> > I have no idea why atm.
>
> Problems with IRQs?
Probably, as when unplugg
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:10:17 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- NR_IRQS is not defined. This is a problem with the include weirdness
due to radix-tree.h, IIRC. It is set to 512 for all PowerPC archs, puh,
that's overkill (but not our problem for the ti
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:10:17 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - NR_IRQS is not defined. This is a problem with the include weirdness
> due to radix-tree.h, IIRC. It is set to 512 for all PowerPC archs, puh,
> that's overkill (but not our problem for the time being).
Indeed
Forgot to attach the patch, sorry.
Wolfgang.
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:13:03 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, the PowerPC tree is not yet supported.
Yes but as i need it now i've decided to port it ;-)
Or at least of a
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:13:03 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, the PowerPC tree is not yet supported.
Yes but as i need it now i've decided to port it ;-)
Or at least of a try.
Good, :-)
You might have realized my hack to get ride of radix-tree
Benjamin Zores wrote:
Hi,
I've downloaded latest Adeos/Ipipe patch for PPC and unfortunately this
latest doesn't (yet) support the ARCH=powerpc architecture from kernel
but only the PPC one.
Yes, the PowerPC tree is not yet supported.
I've tried porting the changes to support the PPC_MERGE a
Hi,
I've downloaded latest Adeos/Ipipe patch for PPC and unfortunately this
latest doesn't (yet) support the ARCH=powerpc architecture from kernel
but only the PPC one.
I've tried porting the changes to support the PPC_MERGE and be able to
still use Xenomai on 2.6.18 with ARCH=powerpc.
Attached
31 matches
Mail list logo
