I'm right, this probably explains most of the difficulty
you're having with my posts.
Ron
>-Original Message-
>From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 5:06 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
&g
e in the discussion with gay marriage.
Gary Smith
Ron Scott wrote:
>
> Are you related to Red Davis?
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 4:31 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
Are you related to Red Davis?
>-Original Message-
>From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 4:31 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
>
>
>So are you or are you not saying that bestiality is
>okay
Message-
>From: Gerald Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 4:36 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
>
>
>So, in effect, you are not opposing anything. You are
>simply giving up
>on the fight against moral crimes a
So, in effect, you are not opposing anything. You are simply giving up
on the fight against moral crimes against society.
On the same note then, why do we not have the state get out of managing
crimes altogether. Let it all be resolved in the civilian courts.
Someone murdered? Why have prisons
t it
shouldn't force itself upon any other state that refuses it.
Gary Smith
Ron Scott wrote:
>
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 2:29 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:59 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
>
>
>At 10:08 AM 3/23/2004, Ron Scott wrote:
>
>
>>I will continue to t
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:58 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
>SNIP<
--RON--
>>2) As I read the constitution, the tax codes (for example) must
>
At 10:08 AM 3/23/2004, Ron Scott wrote:
I will continue to think...and will appreciate receiving
relevant, thoughtful comments from any of you.
RBS
I don't think that you will have any problem with a dearth of commentary
and opinion here on ZION. ;-)
--
Steven Montgomery
"The most important c
At 10:08 AM 3/23/2004, Ron Scott wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:48 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
>But I thought you did support same sex civil
>-Original Message-
>From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:35 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
>
>
>RB Scott wrote:
>> >Tell us more about your "methods for opposing"
RB Scott wrote:
>Tell us more about your "methods for opposing" same-sex
>marriage. --JWR<
I have done this before. I support the proposition that the state
should get out of sanctioning marriages altogether and should,
therefore ( as I noted in an earlier post today) draft
legislation that carefu
>-Original Message-
>From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 2:27 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
>
>
>RB Scott wrote:
>>It would *seem* to you, perhaps. It doesn't *seem* so
RB Scott wrote:
It would *seem* to you, perhaps. It doesn't *seem* so to me. I DO
NOT support same sex marriage, but my methods for opposing it do
not include (at this point) supporting a constitutional amendment
defining **marriage.**
Tell us more about your "methods for opposing" same-sex marriag
>-Original Message-
>From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 2:29 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
>
>
>RB Scott wrote:
>>I do not support extramarital sex of
>>any kind.
RB Scott wrote:
I do not support extramarital sex of
any kind.
What about sex within marriage if marriage is redefined to permit a man to
marry his German Shepherd or his boy friend? --JWR
//
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Plea
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:48 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
>But I thought you did support same sex civil unions. Am I
wrong?<
"Support"
At 08:46 AM 3/23/2004, you wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Cobabe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:30 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
>
>
>
>I believe President Hinkley's remarks on this
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Cobabe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:30 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [ZION] Worth reiterating...
>
>
>
>I believe President Hinkley's remarks on this issue
>succinctly and
>prec
I believe President Hinkley's remarks on this issue succinctly and
precisely outline the present direction of church policy on the marriage
controversy. The church is actively pursuing every means to defend
traditional marriage, including representation in the courts and support
for individu
20 matches
Mail list logo
