William Roche wrote:
Now about the automounter, I share Nico's point of view, but as far as
I
know nothing like that already exist, and No, the automounter or a
mount
request isn't 'clever' enough (or customized enough) yet to handle NFS
data shared by the global zone and translate the mount
Glenn Faden wrote:
Well, it doesn't have to be possible. Instead it should be possible to
have the mount(2) syscall detect the loopback NFS and convert it into a
lofs mount if, say, a flag is set in the arguments, or even by default.
I've thought about doing this in the past, but wasn't
Moore, Joe wrote:
William Roche wrote:
Now about the automounter, I share Nico's point of view, but as far as
I
know nothing like that already exist, and No, the automounter or a
mount
request isn't 'clever' enough (or customized enough) yet to handle NFS
data shared by the global zone and
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:13:34AM -0400, Moore, Joe wrote:
The global zone could be the one running automount. Since it knows
what host is local, it'll convert the nfs mounts to lofs
automagically.
For each zone, add the zone's automount entries to
global:/etc/auto_master as
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:13 -0400, Moore, Joe wrote:
William Roche wrote:
Now about the automounter, I share Nico's point of view, but as far as
I
know nothing like that already exist, and No, the automounter or a
mount
request isn't 'clever' enough (or customized enough) yet to handle
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:55 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:13:34AM -0400, Moore, Joe wrote:
The global zone could be the one running automount. Since it knows
what host is local, it'll convert the nfs mounts to lofs
automagically.
For each zone, add the
Le 30 juin 09 à 16:13, Moore, Joe a écrit :
William Roche wrote:
Now about the automounter, I share Nico's point of view, but as far
as
I
know nothing like that already exist, and No, the automounter or a
mount
request isn't 'clever' enough (or customized enough) yet to handle
NFS
data
Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
Le 30 juin 09 à 16:13, Moore, Joe a écrit :
William Roche wrote:
Now about the automounter, I share Nico's point of view, but as far as
I
know nothing like that already exist, and No, the automounter or a
mount
request isn't 'clever' enough (or customized enough) yet
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 12:58 -0700, Glenn Faden wrote:
This should be added to the FAQ !
As already said by others, it's not perfect, as it should be set up in
the global zone, but it's really better, better, better, better than
the current answer.
Doesn't work.
That's what I thought
Le 30 juin 09 à 21:58, Glenn Faden a écrit :
Excellent !
Sorry...
Makes me angry.
This should be added to the FAQ !
As already said by others, it's not perfect, as it should be set up
in the global zone, but it's really better, better, better, better
than the current answer.
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 13:46 -0700, Glenn Faden wrote:
My personal question now is : why didn't I find it by myself ! :-)
Because it doesn't work. See:
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/fs/autofs/auto_vnops.c#auto_trigger_mount
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:12:57PM -0700, Roman V Shaposhnik wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 13:46 -0700, Glenn Faden wrote:
My personal question now is : why didn't I find it by myself ! :-)
Because it doesn't work. See:
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 16:31 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:12:57PM -0700, Roman V Shaposhnik wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 13:46 -0700, Glenn Faden wrote:
My personal question now is : why didn't I find it by myself ! :-)
Because it doesn't work.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:53:30PM -0700, Roman V Shaposhnik wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 16:31 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
also prevents one from sharing an autofs mount to more than one zone,
which cannot work out well since it would allow a filesystem mounted by
one zone to be visible
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 17:00 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
The problem at hand is a reentrance issue in the VM.
Could you, please, point me to the most authoritative CR that captures
this issue?
Hasn't it been mentioned in this thread already? I could search for it,
but so could you
Roman V Shaposhnik wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 17:00 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
The problem at hand is a reentrance issue in the VM.
Could you, please, point me to the most authoritative CR that captures
this issue?
Hasn't it been mentioned in this thread already? I
Le 1 juil. 09 à 01:48, Glenn Faden a écrit :
Roman V Shaposhnik wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 17:00 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
The problem at hand is a reentrance issue in the VM.
Could you, please, point me to the most authoritative CR that
captures
this issue?
Hasn't it been
17 matches
Mail list logo
