On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:56 +0100, Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems
Ireland) wrote:
> If so how will they be patched?
> ie will they have differenet package versions that those in global zone?
>
non-native zones would have to use non-native methods - specifically
they would have to be patched f
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 13:18 -0700, F.V.(Phil)Porcella wrote:
> I tried to use the dir and special during the initial configuration of a zone
> and
> it only excepted one of them. Also, how many directories can you have
> inherited 'initially'
> before you install the zone?
I'm sure there's a l
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 14:11 -0400, Jeff Victor wrote:
> However, this model does not solve the problem that is documented in
> Clarkson's paper: the "out-of-the-box" experience does not protect
> well-behaved zones from poorly-behaved zones, or a DoS attack.
I see where you are going with this
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 16:02 -0700, DJR wrote:
> I did a quick search of this website, but could not find a definite answer.
>
> when creating a filesystem on the global zone and using lofs to have the zone
> see it, do
> I have to reboot the zone in order for the zone to actually see it.
No.
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 09:33, Bernd Schemmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can I use IP instances with every kind of network adapter?
Hey Bernd,
That is actually answered in the crossbow project FAQ.
Can any NIC be used with IP Instances?
Only NICs supported by the Generic LAN Driver version 3 (GLDv3) a
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 14:53, Sandro wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to install a zone with linux, debian linux actually. I had no
> problems installing CentOS with the tar ball from opensolaris.org
Take a peek at the BrandZ 2.6 kernel page
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/brandz/todo/linux_2_6/
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 12:12 -0400, Sanjay Akula wrote:
> Can any body give the procedure for how to clone a local zone and move
> it on to different server and change the ip address of that cloned
> zone and fire it up with new hostname and new ip address? can someone
> help me on this. I never tr
> Whole Root Zones
> * Each zone is assigned its own root file system and cannot see that of others
Each zone has it's own root directory, regardless of sparse, whole,
native or branded. And you cannot see outside of your root directory
tree unless you have a grossly misconfigured system.
So t
> would I be able to export and import zones from one server to another if I
> have
> different pkg's in local zone from what it is in global? What is the subject
> to
> the resrtictions of PKG_ALL_ZONES? I am not sure if I do undesrtand this part.
The short answer is yes. Since most of your
> Hopefully everyone is aware of the 'update on attach' feature in nv
> that allows you to update the zone to match the gz when you migrate
> from one system to another. It knows about the SUNW_PKG_ALLZONES pkg
> attribute as well as inherited-pkg-dirs and figures out which pkgs to
> update. Tha
Sanjay Akula wrote:
> Hi users,
>
> I have a question regarding /proc under localzones when i zlogin to
> local zone if i do df -h /proc shows 0% but when i do du -sh * on /,
> /proc coming as 8.3GB what are those directories is any way I can
> compress those directories are they are important f
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 11:36 -0700, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> Add a new service "do-single-user-patch", make it depend on filesystem-local.
> This service is typically disabled. This service will add the patch(es)
> and reboot.
The same could be done with a custom milestone which might be less
confu
> No Solaris 10u6 does support zones on zfs, but not as cleanly as nevada,
> there are some differences, as new features are integrated into nevada,
> then later they "might" get backported to soalris updates.
Reminds me of the car commercial - the suggested price is blah,
nicely appointed for
> So just to clarify, the next Lu patch to release ( 121430-30/121431-31,
> saprc/x86 ) that releases will relax that restriction in terms of
> upgrade of zones on zfs, basically allowing zones on zfs to live
> anywhere, ie top level dataset, lower level dataset, or a directory ina
> dataset
For ip-type=shared the communication stays in the system. O(memory
speed). Very fast with little IP processing. This is the default.
For ip-type=exclusive the communication will have to go out the
interface assigned to the nonglobal zone and routed externally to an
interface on the global
> 1. Do you use "set pool=" anymore, now that the dedicated-cpu feature exists?
Until Oracle develops a more rational licensing scheme you should
expect this feature to be in use. I may have many Oracle instances,
each in a separate zone, using the same pool. The sampling on this
discussion l
Carlos Mosquera wrote:
Team.
I explain a little better my question. We have a customer thats wants
install in its M5000 server three containers: Solaris 8, Solaris 9 and
Open Solaris. I know that you Solaris 8 and 9 it´s supported but I
don't hear nothing about Open Solaris, I'm trying to fin
Thanks to Dan Price for catching me in an error. The
M5000 is a Sun4u so the SPARC edition of OpenSolaris
should run on the other dynamic domain just fine.
Sun4us is the legacy Fujitsu server line - my boo boo.
So Carlos, split your M5000 into domains, run Solaris 10 in
one domain and OpenSol
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:50, Pradhap Devarajan wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Check out the Zones faq
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zones/faq/#rm_cpupower .
IOW: What I supposed was correct. :)
Was my reasoning also correct
Yes it was.Since you
Michael Barto wrote:
After you create a zone, can you later set up CPU caps, numbers of
CPU's, memory and any of the other parameters. Is there list of what
cannot be change after its creation?
At this point, not a lot.I can only think of two:the brand and the
set of inherit-pkg-dirs
This is puzzling. While I haven't tried it, I do not see why it
wouldn't be possible to change both of those things. Painful yes, but
not impossible.
I don't know for a fact that the zone configuration file is the only
place that this
is recorded and it is not a public stable interface.
Jeff Victor wrote:
Just FYI: I measured patching throughput improvement with the
not-yet-released Zones Parallel Patching patch. You can read about my
findings at http://blogs.sun.com/JeffV/entry/patching_zones_goes_zoom
.
Very nice piece of work, Jeff. Very useful information.
Bob
_
Is it not allowed to have non-global zones on an arbitrary
zpool? Who says so?
I bet there is more to the question than was originally asked. Yes,
you can have
non-global zones in ZFS starting with Solaris 10 10/08. If you also use
Live Upgrade *and* you are using ZFS for your root
I have read that document but I do not
see any discussion of how to handle sparse zones ; I am particularly
concerned about the zones which have their own /usr . Will their /usr
partitions be kept in sync and if so *HOW*?
There are 2 parts to this question: sparse vs whole root and how live
Solaris 10 with sparse root zones provides an excellent virtualization solution.
If you want systems that are largely identical (but perhaps with different
applications) then it's pretty much optimal, and very resource efficient.
Agreed. The most efficient form of application stacking with
c
("create -b" is simpler and has essentially the same effect, but isn't
supported because it removes all inherited directories, and if we were
ever to add more directories, it may remove ones that shouldn't be
removed.)
Is this a recent change ?zonecfg create starts off with
/etc/zones
26 matches
Mail list logo
