Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-07 Thread Charlie Clark
Hi Yuppie, Am 07.09.2012, 09:01 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: [-] means that we don't want/need to convert this [?] means that we still have to decide if and how this should be converted [/] means unfinished Regarding RSS: you've written [/] ISyndicatable @@rss.xml (not

Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-07 Thread yuppie
Hi Charlie! Charlie Clark wrote: Am 07.09.2012, 09:01 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: And I have a quick and dirty view implementation for local role/sharing. Reimplementing it based on formlib would be a lot of work, so maybe I should just check in my code. As I'm not even

Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-06 Thread yuppie
Hi Charlie! Charlie Clark wrote: Am 05.09.2012, 09:07 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: The setup of your doctest looks fine, you just have to enable syndication for the folder (app.site) to get the view. Tests landed yesterday and I also ran them with the oldstyle

Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-06 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 06.09.2012, 13:11 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: Good. What is, in your view, missing from a final release? Laurence proposed some changes for the utilities: https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2012-September/030381.html If we agree that's the way to go, I'd like to

Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-06 Thread Laurence Rowe
On 6 September 2012 14:06, Charlie Clark charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote: Am 06.09.2012, 13:11 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: Good. What is, in your view, missing from a final release? Laurence proposed some changes for the utilities:

Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-06 Thread Charlie Clark
Hiya Laurence, Am 06.09.2012, 14:46 Uhr, schrieb Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk: I think the downsides from leaving it out are: * Another branch of five.localsitemanager to maintain. * Incompatibility between CMF 2.3 and Zope 4 once the parent pointer changes go in. What's the

Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-06 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 06.09.2012, 16:24 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: These changes provide better backward compatibility for code using CMF tools/utilities and better forward compatibility for running CMF on Zope 4. (*If* the proposed changes become part of Zope 4.) As you say, if. We don't

Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-06 Thread Charlie Clark
I always like the solipsism of replying to myself! ;-) Am 06.09.2012, 16:58 Uhr, schrieb Charlie Clark charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu: hm, I drew up the lists from the existing Scripts/Templates and thought it was complete. I've just checked again and can only find the following as

Re: [Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-05 Thread yuppie
Hi Charlie! Charlie Clark wrote: * is there an easy way to write the test for something that requires a tool and some content? The setup of your doctest looks fine, you just have to enable syndication for the folder (app.site) to get the view. * backporting the changes to the

[Zope-CMF] Security declarations on adapters

2012-09-04 Thread Charlie Clark
Yuppie recently pointed out that I'd completely forgotten about the RSS output of my changes to syndication which was broken. While I was fixing this I was struck by two things: * is there an easy way to write the test for something that requires a tool and some content? * backporting