On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 03:55, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
FWIW, I'm scheduled to sprint on finishing my cleanup of
ZPublisher.WSGIResponse with the WebLion guys at or around PSE in May.
Cleanup, really? Since the repoze effort reimplemented the publisher I
had the feeling that the
+1 for the summaries, I read them. Thanks for writing them!
Vincent
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
What's the next step? I'd love to see some roadmapping ala that you did
for Plone 5, in particular to discuss our WSGI story (which I'm
interested in helping out with if others can help
Hi,
the explicit way to address a view is using the /@@viewname namespace
traversal.
An IAbsoluteURL for a browser view returns an URL without the @@ (i.e.
/foo/bar/view instead of /foo/bar/@@view). I think this should be
changed so that the URL contains the @@.
If you agree with this, where
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 10:25:09AM +0200, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
the explicit way to address a view is using the /@@viewname namespace
traversal.
An IAbsoluteURL for a browser view returns an URL without the @@ (i.e.
/foo/bar/view instead of /foo/bar/@@view). I think this should be
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 05:41:17AM +0200, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
There's no big roadmap yet, but I have some ideas :)
snip
All that said, we'll change plans if something comes up and a better
plan suggests itself. The above list is obviously non-exclusive, so if
someone else has anything he
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is a Python issue or a zope issue. We're getting a
segfault on 64-bit SuSE Linux (SLES 11), originating from
z3c.autoinclude, which in turn called zope.configuration's include /
implementation. This calls expat, which then crashes (no error, log
message, or core file,
Marius Gedminas wrote:
Are you sure that most views provide IBrowserView these days? URL
traversal looks them up as multi-adapters providing just Interface.
True and you will almost never see a view class using
implements(IBrowserView) directly. Still, if you use the browser:view
or
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Any tips on how to debug or similar experiences would be appreciated!
If you're on some Unix flavor, you should be able to deconstruct the
return code from the runzope process to determine if the app was
killed by a
Fred Drake wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Any tips on how to debug or similar experiences would be appreciated!
If you're on some Unix flavor, you should be able to deconstruct the
return code from the runzope process to determine if the
On 2010-04-01 12:31:10 +0200, Jacob Holm j...@improva.dk said:
Marius Gedminas wrote:
Are you sure that most views provide IBrowserView these days? URL
traversal looks them up as multi-adapters providing just Interface.
True and you will almost never see a view class using
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Mar 31 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Thu Apr 1 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 7 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 1 from ct at gocept.com.
Unknown
---
Subject: FAILURE: Repository policy check found errors in 715 projects
From: ct at gocept.com
Date:
* Christian Theune c...@gocept.com [2010-03-31 17:16]:
we decided to keep going with the meetings, so I'd be happy to see you
guys next week in #zope.
I'm all in favor, it seems to me the meetings really help in moving things
along.
For those of you who can't/don't participate in those
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pretty sure it is. The pdb rabbit hole ended at pyexpat.c. I can't
see what's going on there, but when I did 'r' it blew up.
If you can point me at the ZCML file you were trying to parse (or
email it to me
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
I don't think I'll be able to work on it, but I think it's worth
consideration: Unicode issues with Zope 2.12. I've seen these on at
least three different Zope 2 sites built with a combination of TTW page
templates,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
- Five deprecation
+1 - sounds hairy, though.
Getting rid of the Zope 2 specific ViewPageTemplateFile and BrowserView
(already done, I guess) would be a good starting point.
With Zope
Am 01.04.2010, 15:30 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu:
With Zope 2.12 BrowserView is basically done. You can now import the
BrowserView class from zope.publisher.browser instead of the one from
Five. But ZCML directives still use the Five class, to ensure code
using fancy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 03:55, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
FWIW, I'm scheduled to sprint on finishing my cleanup of
ZPublisher.WSGIResponse with the WebLion guys at or around PSE in May.
Cleanup, really? Since
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 01.04.2010, 15:30 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu:
With Zope 2.12 BrowserView is basically done. You can now import the
BrowserView class from zope.publisher.browser instead of the one
Fred Drake wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm pretty sure it is. The pdb rabbit hole ended at pyexpat.c. I can't
see what's going on there, but when I did 'r' it blew up.
If you can point me at the ZCML file you were trying to parse (or
Am 01.04.2010, 16:11 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu:
The class you get from any ZCML directive is going to be the one from
Five using the Five.bbb.AcquisitionBBB mix-in. It emulates enough of
Acquisition without actually using it. You cannot opt-out of that bit
of bbb
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
- Five deprecation
+1 - sounds hairy, though.
Getting rid of the Zope 2 specific ViewPageTemplateFile and BrowserView
(already done, I guess) would be a good
Le mercredi 31 mars 2010 18:32:31, vous avez écrit :
A few questions that you may want to add in a FAQ.
We started that page and will publish it very soon, based on most points you
raised. Other pages are also being worked on, such as an overview of a simple
NEO cluster.
- Why not include
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:47:36PM +0200, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
I don't think I'll be able to work on it, but I think it's worth
consideration: Unicode issues with Zope 2.12. I've seen these on at
least three
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
What's the next step? I'd love to see some roadmapping ala that you did
for Plone 5, in particular to discuss our WSGI story (which I'm
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 15:53, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
As you can see from the diffs, I gut sidetracked writing tests for
HTTPResponse, since I needed to make changes to it to do the WSGI fix,
and it was effectively untested.
Very cool!
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 18:24, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 15:53, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
As you can see from the diffs, I gut sidetracked writing tests for
HTTPResponse, since I needed to make changes to it to do the WSGI fix,
and it was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
What's the next step? I'd love to see some roadmapping ala that you did
for Plone 5, in particular to discuss our WSGI story (which I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Fred Drake wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm pretty sure it is. The pdb rabbit hole ended at pyexpat.c. I can't
see what's going on there, but when I did 'r' it blew up.
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
/me is deeply suspicious of *any* distro-provided python, ever.
I'm also suspicious of 64-bit builds, given that I'm not using one on
my dev machine.
I've picked up the OpenSuSE installation ISOs; hopefully that's close
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:07:26PM +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a Python issue or a zope issue. We're getting a
segfault on 64-bit SuSE Linux (SLES 11), originating from
z3c.autoinclude, which in turn called zope.configuration's include /
implementation. This calls
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Fred Drake wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm pretty sure it is. The pdb rabbit hole ended at pyexpat.c. I can't
see what's going on there, but
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:07:26PM +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a Python issue or a zope issue. We're getting a
segfault on 64-bit SuSE Linux (SLES 11), originating from
z3c.autoinclude, which in turn called zope.configuration'sinclude /
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 18:24, Lennart Regebrorege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 15:53, Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote:
As you can see from the diffs, I gut sidetracked writing tests for
HTTPResponse, since I needed to make changes to it to do the
Fred Drake wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote:
/me is deeply suspicious of *any* distro-provided python, ever.
I'm also suspicious of 64-bit builds, given that I'm not using one on
my dev machine.
I've picked up the OpenSuSE installation ISOs;
Hi Martin
Given that its failing on a call to libc I would do a quick run with
strace and ltrace.
(In your case ltrace will be probably be more useful.) You will be
able to see the calls into the libraries and you should see
immediately
if your segfault is inside expat or not. (ltrace output
36 matches
Mail list logo
