Andre Schubert wrote:
Hi there,
are there any known issues or problem running Zope 2.4.3 under PYthon 2.2
instead of 2.1. I'am asking because my sysadmin has setup a new linux-box
with RH7.3.
RH7.3 only has Python 2.2 installed and there are no RPMs compiled against Python
2.2.
If there
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Adrian Hungate writes:
We should avoid sending the wrong
message by making a hotfix for every little thing.
Shane
I'd like to second this. It was one of the contibuting factors in the
decision of my former employers to opt for spectra instead
Tres Seaver wrote:
Whithout the fix, virtually every Zope site in the world is vulnerable
to URL-based cross-site scripting exploits. For instance, any URL which
contains invalid form variable marshalling can generate an error page
which includes the erroneous value, unquoted. E.g.:
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
snip
Wow! That was very very cool. I look forward to helping make this all a
reality in Zope 3 ;-)
I'm sure I left a few things out, so ask questions about the unclear
parts. It's probably more info than you were expecting. ;-)
Hmm
Gary Poster wrote:
I agree with Chris: *wow*!
[re the original explanation]
...
I'm sure I left a few things out, so ask questions about the unclear
parts.
Everything was wonderfully clear, except that the actual mechanism to
convert the nested tuples flexibly to RDBMS record
Mehran erfani wrote:
I am a newbie to the zope world and recently started
using zope in our corporate development environment.
One thing that I couldn't find so far is an easy way
to use cvs for revision control for individual
components developed in zope. I understand that zope
has its own
On 1 Aug 2002, Gary Poster wrote:
Given a hypothetical folder-like instance called myFLI, we would
presumably want, in CVS (or Subversion, or whatever) a folder named
myFLI containing the children and a file named, to borrow your
example, myFLI.properties.zexp that *only* contains the
Steve Alexander wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
os.stat() raises OSError if the file is not found, in which case mtime
should be set to 0.
Surely if the file is not found, that's an error because the
PageTemplateFile is pointing at a source file that doesn't exist.
I cannot think
Steve Alexander wrote:
lib/python/Products/PageTemplateFile.py, line 110, method _cook_check
try:mtime=os.stat(self.filename)[8]
except: mtime=0
I've just spent an hour or so tracking down an awkward bug in some
unit-tests. The true error was being hidden by this
seb bacon wrote:
Production sites running a stock Zope are vulnerable to abuse of their
server if they have not removed the 'Examples' folder. For example,
anyone could use http://notcarefulenough.com/Examples/FileLibrary as a
warez repository.
Are you sure? I get an Unauthorized error
seb bacon wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
seb bacon wrote:
Production sites running a stock Zope are vulnerable to abuse of
their server if they have not removed the 'Examples' folder. For
example, anyone could use
http://notcarefulenough.com/Examples/FileLibrary as a warez
seb bacon wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
seb bacon wrote:
Production sites running a stock Zope are vulnerable to abuse of
their server if they have not removed the 'Examples' folder. For
example, anyone could use
http://notcarefulenough.com/Examples/FileLibrary as a warez
Tim Hoffman wrote:
Hi
I must be stupid or something, but I can't for the life
of me work out a simple way of determining if a variable contains
a string or array, in a PythonScript in Zope.
I can't import type and or use type() function.
isinstance doesn't work because I can't give a
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
We recently discovered that there's a bad interaction between ZODB and
Python without large file support running on a platform that supports
large files. In this specific configuration, os.path.exists() returns
false for files 2 GB and ZODB creates a new Data.fs.
Wow...
Max M wrote:
Is information about Zope development only discussed orally at zope.com,
or is attached as comments in the cvs, or where do you guys keep each
other up to date about changes taking place?
There are dozens (sometimes hundreds) of updates, usually posted with
nearly complete
Nicholas Henke (by way of Nicholas Henke ) wrote:
Given the following code:
I can see why access to self.thing fails in Inner::__setattr__, but the
question is how do I do that -- can I not use __setattr__ and have to use a
setAttr that is accessed via O.I.setAttr('help','me rhonda') ?
William Trenker wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Suddenly when I refresh products it seems that all imported modules in
the refreshed product are set to None, because after a refresh,
anything I try to do always ends up with an error message like None
has no attribute foobar or None is not
William Trenker wrote:
At 09:36 AM 6/3/02 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Are you working with products that use the old style [of product
initialization]? Are they still around? ;-)
I'm developing a Zope Database Adapter (DA) for the SQLite
(http://www.hwaci.com/sw/sqlite) embedded
Lennart Regebro wrote:
From: Wei He [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An object (say index_html) is inherited by child objects of the site say
Document to make http://www.domain.com/Document share the upper
level index_html. This sounds good but acutally not I think.
It not only sounds good, but it is
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Jim Penny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you referring to what I call magic boolean attributes ?
http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zpt/2002-March/003013.html
Yes, thanks very much, this is very helpful. I see that you could find
no documentation on this, and got no
Paul Everitt wrote:
Let's say we had a queue in Zope. We could asynchronously send changes
into the queue. Later, based on some policy (e.g. idle time, clock
ticks, etc.), those changes would be enacted/committed.
Imagine the queue itself is in a different storage, likely
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
CM == Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Completely agreed. My disagreement is portraying the counter
problem as impossible with the zodb. I think some people, as
evidenced by some of the responses, are willing to live with the
tradeoffs. Other
Simon Michael wrote:
R. David Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Probably, but I naively imagined that I was sophisticated enough
to be finding a real problem...but I'm obviously not smart enough
to realize that a breakage this fundamental could be due to a package
like ZDebug.
I wasn't
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
I've been putting in code for Zope 2.6 that replaces the functionality
of ZDebug. ZDebug was always woefully unsafe. Zope 2.6 will have
improved tracebacks.
Does that mean we can turn them off when we don't want them
Ivo van der Wijk wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to do some bookkeeping *after* an object has been published,
i.e. imagine a request is done for:
/a/b/c/d
'b' is the (folderish) object that does the accounting, 'd' is the object
to be published. I would like 'b' to examine the RESPONSE
Matt Behrens wrote:
I've got some rather funky auth requirements where I need to stop Zope
from challenging Basic authentication when Unauthorized is raised.
I seem to be able to do this if I monkey-patch
HTTPResponse.unauthorized(), but what I'd really like is to be able to
hook into
Rossen Raykov wrote:
My point was that Zope is revealing internal information that is believed to
be private and invisible for the Internet users.
It happens in its default (debug) installation and even after -D option is
removed from the startup script.
Rossen and others interested in
I've created a proposal that details what I'm working on to improve
tracebacks for Zope 2.6. (A lot of the work is also going into Zope 3X.)
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/BetterTracebacks
Everyone who is interested in improving Zope's tracebacks, please review
the proposal and
Florent Guillaume wrote:
So I don't understand the different treatments, with bobo_traverse I get
a None container, which makes the validate fail, whereas standard
traversal calls ac_acquire with as a filter validate2, the filters
receives a container, and this validation suceeds.
If
Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
Toby Dickenson wrote:
but ssh port forwarding is only one layer of TCP. ssh port forwarding
is good.
I'mp pretty sure it's TCP over TCP (ssh protocol does multiplexing). SSL
OTOH is not TCP over TCP.
I think you are mistaken. :-) The site you referred
Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:19:11 -0500, Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There are some disadvantages: anybody who has an account on either
zeoclient or zeostorage has full read/write access to the database.
A VPN would also work, but you'd still have the local
Eric Roby wrote:
Anyone had any experience trying to secure the transactions between ZEO
clients and a storage server??? Our shop is already using OpenSSH, I
have read some introductory information about OpenSSH. It is just not
clear to me the level of effort required to implement this or
Anthony Baxter wrote:
Adrian Hungate wrote
moved to a different thread or earlier, before the fork, so that we could
simply kill senile threads without killing the entire shooting match?
unfortunately apache does this with seperate processes, not threads.
memory corruption and leaks
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Well, I have the energy, I just don't know where to start. But it's
beginning to look like I'll just have to roll up my sleeves and dive in
C code to hunt this beast down. And to think that I'd chosen Python as
my official programming language to avoid just
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Magnus Heino wrote:
What browser are you using? Strange things like this happen for me
occasionally after a Mozilla upgrade, but I just delete the cookies for
the site and everything goes back to normal. I figure someone at
Netscape is just fiddling with the cookie
Jean-Paul Smets wrote:
I could find out that certain cookie names work, some others do not
Works
__ac_
__ac_ra
__ac_rak1
__ac_nex1
__ac_erp5
Does not work
__ac
__ac_rack1
__ac_rack12
Really strange.
What browser are you using? Strange things like this happen for me
Christian Theune wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 07:53:35AM -0500, Paul Everitt wrote:
A gentle reminder on some of the posts in this thread. Please don't
respond with I'd really like some good idea. Respond with I'm
willing to do the work for some good idea. That's part of the point
with
seb bacon wrote:
Well, I just ran a very naive test and it suggests that zpt may be about
twice as slow as dtml.
I made a DTML Method, and a ZPT, identical to each other, containing
only HTML:
html
Test
/html
Then I ran the ab benchmarking tool against each method, thus:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Another data point. Copy paste of ParsedXML documents is normal
and fast when the object is in a folder not surrounded by too
many other folders (or objects in general, not sure yet). If I create
a bunch of very large folders sitting next to the ParsedXML document
Romain Slootmaekers wrote:
Yo dudes,
I have problems with dependencies on Zope 2.4.3:
If I try to import OFS.SimpleItem directly, I get following problem.
(snip)
ImportError: cannot import name Persistent
If you do 'import Zope' first, you don't have this problem.
But I can't do that
Anthony Baxter wrote:
Behrens Matt - Grand Rapids wrote
Anthony Baxter wrote:
In that case, how about cutting a version which is 2.4.3 + the compiler
fixes? Crashes are bad, and it would be very nice to Make Them Go Away. :)
You already have that. Check out the Zope-2_4-branch from CVS (see
Andy Dawkins wrote:
Zope 3X requires Python 2.2b2.
Are you sure you mean Python2.2b2?
I tried this but seem to get problems with the pyexpat module.
Would a different version do, Or have you solved any problems with the
pyexpat module in 2.2.b2?
Make sure you have expat, including
Lupus Yonderboy wrote:
I have tried hooking __getattr__ and have a hard time
avoiding recursion; I have taken a look at the
ever-productive Shane Hathaway's TransparentFolder
product as well but I think I am let down by my lack
of understanding of the particulars of acquisition.
Here are
Ken Manheimer wrote:
Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This hasn't been fixed because it's not well understood. Javascript can
POST an invisible form, AFAIK. The problem occurs on the browsers of
users who are *already authenticated*. It has nothing to do with Zope
or any server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a high-traffic site, wouldn't the log get really big, really quickly with
tracebacks? It is also nice to have the tracebacks in the browser window
for debugging...
But the log won't grow more than Z2.log. Yes, it is nice to have the
tracebacks in the browser
Ivan Raikov wrote:
Recently, I had to replace ZPublisher's default
authentication scheme, as part of a product I'm working on. I am aware
of the existence of LoginManager, exUserFolder, etc., but in this case
I needed to have a custom login screen at root level, i.e. completely
get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I think this really should be an integration issue instead of a
Zope issue: use a front-end proxy server (i.e. Squid) and set up ACLs to
prevent this...
This hasn't been fixed because it's not well understood. Javascript can
POST an invisible form,
Holger Blasum wrote:
Dear *,
naively I volunteered for a talk on zope in autumn to a (small) CS student
audience. However, I must confess that do not understand the
basics about the API:
What is the most general and state-of-the-art way (including
necessary imports from the zope
Romain Slootmaekers wrote:
Yo dudes,
VSEval in Documenttemplate tries to set Eval
No problem but RestictedPython has no Eval attribute by default
so you need to import it
add this line to RestrictedPython/__init__.py
import Eval
Actually, VSEval currently does *not* apply restrictions.
Following the Zope 2.5 plan, I have just added to CVS the capability for
user passwords to be encrypted in the standard user folder. Please try
it out. If it works correctly there should be no outwardly visible
differences.
I'm also soliciting the assistance of developers and users of
Following the Zope 2.5 plan, I have just added to CVS the capability for
user passwords to be encrypted in the standard user folder. Please try
it out. If it works correctly there should be no outwardly visible
differences.
I'm also soliciting the assistance of developers and users of custom
Zopistas,
Please support or denounce this proposal. Integrated HTTPS support in
Zope would be really nice IMHO.
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ZServerSSLIntegration
Shane
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andre Schubert wrote:
after searching the soures if found a way the point of disaster.
in TransparentFolderPatch i changed the line:
if tpids and not self._v_no_transparent and name[:3] != '_p_' :
to:
if tpids and not self._v_no_transparent and name[:3] != '_p_' and
name[-11:] !=
marc lindahl wrote:
From: Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. Trying the same thing with 2.4.0b2 and reporting the results
Yikes... I need CMF! So far it's not recommended with 2.4!
Are there plans to fix this in the 2.3 branch?
Actually, it was only not recommended that you use
Andy McKay wrote:
It depends on your experience. In your opinion you find it easier (now I can
write a Zope product in my sleep I agree). Most Zope users however, in my
experience, try ZClasses first.
When I came to Zope, within a week I was getting ready to write a Python
product. (And I
On Friday 22 June 2001 04:24, Erik Enge wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Now, if the ZPL were GPL compatible, the GPL would be in full effect
for products. Digital Creations would automatically have the rights
to redistribute derivatives of ZWiki. I believe DC would even
On Friday 22 June 2001 06:55, Eric Roby wrote:
I'm glad to know the product is being used. I don't think it will be
in the core distribution since it causes a performance hit.
I use Transparent Folders HEAVILY in my site designs. There are some
Gotchas' that I have learned to deal with
A new release of Transparent folders is ready. The only real difference
is compatibility with Zope 2.3.3.
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/TransparentFolders
CookieCrumbler has been re-released independently of CMF. Thanks to
living in the CMF for a while, the security hole has been
On Friday 22 June 2001 10:59, Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
If we're willing to start changing things at the C level, however,
there are more options.
Well, given how extremely useful skins seem as a concept (rather than
just in their CMF context), along with Transparent
On Friday 22 June 2001 12:33, Simon Michael wrote:
Thanks for a most illuminating thread. Slight clarification to a
comment of yours Shane -
Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GPL code together. ZWiki is just in a strange position because the
GPL is not actually in effect.
I'm
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Joachim Werner wrote:
Transparent Folders are used very often at iuveno. And we would like to do
so in the future because they really provide an easy way to structure
objects in folders. But with Zope 2.3.3 we get errors like that when we
start an instance that uses
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Joachim Werner wrote:
Tomorrow I hope to release a version of TransparentFolders that works
around the problem, so you can wait for that instead if you like.
Cool! Could you maybe put the patch that currently is applied in
OFS/__init.py__ into a Hotfix? This would
Jim Penny wrote:
DC and FSF somehow have to come to some understandings of the following
questions.
Here is my own view (not DC's offical word!)
Can a GPL (unmodified) component be distributed for Zope (at all)?
I think the message by Bradley Kuhn is a little misleading.
If you are the
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Toby Dickenson wrote:
However, I dont think encrypting user passwords is enough. Data.fs may
contain plaintext passwords for relational databases, and in many
cases it contains arbitrary confidential information.
True. The RDBMS passwords are probably more sensitive
Jephte Clain wrote:
the question is: what transaction is commited with
get_transaction().commit() ? It is only the one associated
with the connection, or also the transaction in which is the
caller?
I mean, if my method is called from within Zope, is the
transaction of the caller commited?
Here are a couple of ideas I'd like to toss out. Proposals can take a
lot of time to write and it might be easier this way to flesh out the
details.
1) Optional password encryption. Right now passwords are stored as
clear text. What's interesting is that Zope can already authenticate
On Monday 18 June 2001 15:33, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:28:54PM -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
1) Optional password encryption. Right now passwords are stored as
clear text. What's interesting is that Zope can already authenticate
against SHA encrypted passwords
Tim McLaughlin wrote:
root has a role called 'User' with 'View' permissions (anonymous is
disabled) and acl_users has a user called joe. joe can access objects in
folder2 according to the permissions set on the root by using acquisition
like this:
http://server/folder1/folder2/object1
joe
Morten W. Petersen wrote:
during testing of a mail product I've discovered that the Data.fs file may
bloat considerably after storing 50 messages. Packing the database will
reduce the Data.fs file to 20 MB (from 40 MB). Another thing is that
storing 50 messages takes a *long time* on a
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Did you catalog each message? What version of Zope?
Yes, every message was cataloged. Zope version 2.3.2
3) Manually zap the caches periodically, which is a capability of Zope
2.4.x.
Okay
On Thursday 07 June 2001 07:43, Toby Dickenson wrote:
Large catalog
updates (where every object is reindexed) also generate a lot of
conflicts.
Is that last bit true? I thought 'Update Catalog' created *new*
indexes. There might be a conflict on the root catalog object, but
not on the
On Thursday 07 June 2001 11:51, Erik Enge wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
It really doesn't matter how many conflicts there are. Within a
single transaction, 1 conflict is as bad as 100.
Why?
Because in Zope it means the whole request is processed again (which
can lead
On Thursday 07 June 2001 12:17, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 09:34 AM 6/7/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
One thing I didn't make clear in the proposal is that I'm interested
in repurposing ZCatalog as a general ZODB indexing mechanism and
essentially moving it down from the application layer
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
That is, in ZPatterns one can specify triggers such as:
WHEN OBJECT DELETED, CHANGED CALL
someCatalog.manage_uncatalog(self.absolute_url(1))
WHEN OBJECT ADDED, CHANGED CALL
someCatalog.manage_catalog(self,self.absolute_url(1))
After I read this again I realized what
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
I was thinking that certain types of objects would be committed by the
transaction manager before all others. In this case, the catalog (or a
special object in the catalog) would be committed first. It would
resolve all conflicts in the contained
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My impression is that FileStorage implements a 32-bit id-type-thingy
somewhere (look at ZODB docs, I think there is something about this
somewhere), which limits it (in addition to the Linux kernel ext2 fs limit),
to 2GB. With 7.5 GB, I'd use a more advanced
marc lindahl wrote:
Does anyone have any comments on the reliability of PartitionedFileStorage
in this regard as a temporary solution? Is anyone using
PartitionedFileStorage in a production environment?
AFAIK no. Its functionality has already been superceded.
by?
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2001 10:03:31 -0400 (EDT), Shane Hathaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now ZCatalog randomly generates ConflictErrors even if there are no
conflicts in the data being indexed. It's quite rare, however, and
there's machinery
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
How did you miss the point? That's exactly the point! :-)
Oh :)
Right now ZCatalog randomly generates ConflictErrors even if there are
no conflicts in the data being indexed.
This is why I think I've
I have written a proposal.
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ArmoredCatalog
Could it be that we're involved in yet another Battle of Fredericksburg
and we're trying to save innocent ZCatalogs from a ZODB conflict?
Nawww... ;-)
Shane
___
New product:
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/LeakFinder
This product assists in locating memory leaks in Zope code. It uses
patterns we, at Digital Creations, often employ for fixing memory leaks.
It provides a way to get a controlled refcount and the traceback of
class instance creation.
Albert Langer wrote:
[Phillip]
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ORMappingDB
Comments encouraged!
[Albert]
I've added some there.
Jim highlighted a project Risk there:
Updates to RDBMS data outside of the OR mapping could cause
cached data to be inconsistent.
I agree!
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ORMappingDB
Comments encouraged!
Shane
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 04:13 PM 5/14/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Regarding performance, this method is actually ideal IMHO. Data is read
once, converted to an object, and kept for later connections, just like
ZODB.
[shrug] Not any different than ZPatterns
On Mon, 14 May 2001, ender wrote:
i want to thank DC (jim, shane, and paul) for inviting me to come to the new
DC offices. i had a great time and learned a bunch... and met
the BFDL.
It was good to talk with you!
i gave a quick overview of the smartobjects design/framework and jim and
R. David Murray wrote:
Now, if the ZMI were rewritten to be session based, and you used
a non-basic-auth based session, you could avoid the problem.
Want to volunteer to do the rewrite? grin
Actually if you install the CMFCore product and put a CookieCrumbler at
the root of your site, you get
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
If we had a standardized manipulation API or idioms (like JavaBeans) for
application objects, then having lots of ways to *implement* storage would
be a good thing. Different products and offerings could co-exist and
compete in the storage
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 05:42 PM 5/11/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
I'm not quite clear on how exactly you suggest mapping from RDMBS -
ZODB. There's a *significant* (IMHO) impedance mismatch between ZODB's
arbitrarily identified variably structured single
Joachim Werner wrote:
Probably I'm daft because it is Friday night, but AFAIK ZODB and most
OODB's
store an object only once, keyed by its object id. The rest is just
references
through that oid, so objects that belong to more than one container can be
added to all these containers
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
I'm telling you there's a lot more you can do with the code that makes
snip
The next thing to do is to write a fishbowl proposal.
This sounds cool but made my head hurt :-S
Can you try and bring this back down to the level of us mere
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
One would define an ObjectMappingSchema whose job it is to store and
retrieve objects of a specific type and in a specific location. It
would usually grab a database connection object to do its work. When
loading, it would perform a query
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
ZPatterns implements storage logic on the application level.
Applications have to be aware of (in fact they have to be centered
around) ZPatterns. This alternate approach keeps storage logic
independent of application logic. It lets you
Joachim Werner wrote:
Hi!
Do you know that there already is a project for OR-Mapping in Zope
(actually
there are two ...)?
Yes, and I think the projects need to look into replacing parts of ZODB
rather than adding complexity. ZODB has pieces that can be split apart
and
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 11:01 AM 5/11/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Joachim Werner wrote:
The current design plans of SmartObjects are mainly based on the assumption
that we will not be able to change Zope itself. This is not a dogma for us,
however. I guess doing OR-mapping
Fred Wilson Horch wrote:
The problem that happens on import is a KeyError on line 194 of this bit
of code:
lines 192-197 of lib/python/ZODB/ExportImport.py
ooid=h[:8]
if oids:
oid=oids[ooid]
if type(oid) is
Kapil (and others),
Although very sketchy and I can't guarantee anything works, my
experiments with object-relational mapping in Zope are found at
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/ormapping.tar.gz . If ORMapping.py
is in the ZODB directory, you can use the following custom_zodb.py to
run
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
But storage of binary pickles was never the intention anyway. I created
a little interface that would allow you to store different classes in
different PostgreSQL tables. Before I got to implementing anything,
Is this much like the ZPatterns approach?
Which part
Fred Wilson Horch wrote:
You wrote:
Importing multiple objects simultaneously could result in a fair amount
of confusion...
Can you elaborate? When you import a folder, for example, it imports
the folder and all objects in it.
If there are some objects in the folder that have
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
I think the motivation people want an RDBMS storage beneth zodb is
because they understand RDBMSes these days are performant, relieable
and can quiete easy maintained.
The other motivations for an RDBMS are (1) people have existing schemas
and want Zope to access the
Joachim Werner wrote:
You know, it might be possible to get a team together to implement
this. How many out there would be interested in pursuing it further?
IMHO it's not as much work as it sounds at first. Zope being so
object-oriented, you really can replace one of its most
301 - 400 of 537 matches
Mail list logo
