On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 22:30, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Kapil Thangavelu]
> > ...
> > I like the layouts Jim's presented (specifically #2 of 3), i think when
> > considering the subversion docs, the important distinctions are made
> > between the directories used for branches and tags, as long as that
>
[Kapil Thangavelu]
> ...
> I like the layouts Jim's presented (specifically #2 of 3), i think when
> considering the subversion docs, the important distinctions are made
> between the directories used for branches and tags, as long as that
> information is clearly communicated the semantics are exa
> > None of the above components handles Unicode in this way,
> > but it seems to be how the Unicode support in Zope 2 was meant to be
used.
Martijn wrote:
> You're actually wrong about Formulator. :)
Apologies. We were using older versions of Formulator before, and I was
just doing code inspec
Hi Syver,
Please add this issue to the Collector, including the test (prefereably
without the twisted bits)
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 12:57, Syver Enstad wrote:
> [...]
>
> I have a strange case here with ReadConflictErrors. I don't know if
> this is covered already but anyway. I am using ZODB 3.2 s
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:48, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Jim]
> > The standard subversion repository layout is by project:
> >
> >proj1
> > /trunk
> > /branches
> > /br1
> > /br2
> > ...
> > /tags
> > /tag1
> >
On 11/03/2004, at 7:25 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 23:14, michael wrote:
Thanks for your excellent isolation here.
I don't get a KeyError thrown until *after* at least one rendering of
standard_error_message that includes an access to a session variable.
And I'm only getting
[Tim Peters]
>> ...
>> IOW, the existing subversion docs cover "the standard" layout quite
>> well. If we do something unique, I'm afraid it becomes another piece
>> of folklore that will be impossible to guess and difficult to find
>> out about.
[Martijn Faassen]
> I don't know much about subvers
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 18:06, Tim Peters wrote:
> Connection objects never had such a method, but they still do .
Ya, I figured this out later. ;-)
> > This breaks any mounted databases (which breaks dbtab, which breaks
> > sessions, which breaks lots of other things). Hopefully this is
> > simpl
David Convent wrote:
Hi Bjorn,
I always believed that unicode and utf-8 were same encoding, but reading
you let me think i was wrong.
Can you tell me what the difference is between unicode and utf-8 ?
Unicode should not be seen as an encoding as such. While Python
internally uses an encoding for
Bjorn Stabell wrote:
Formulator:
* gets charset from manage_page_charset (same as ZMI), but can be overridden
* stores field values as encoded text (not Unicode), but lets you specify
which encoding to use
(confusingly calls this "unicode" mode)
* messages are stored as UTF-8 (hardcoded)
While t
[Chris McDonough]
> ...
> - The ZODBMountPoint product relies on a method of Connection objects
> named _getMountedConnection, which apparently no longer exists.
Connection objects never had such a method, but they still do .
> This breaks any mounted databases (which breaks dbtab, which breaks
>
Tim Peters wrote:
I read some subversion docs over the weekend, and so am sufficiently
prepared to live with the oddities of "a standard" subversion layout. I
think that if you make a non-standard layout, then everyone coming to, or
going from, Zope from/to other subversion projects will be foreve
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:47:39PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Our minimal tool usage is probably: "Actions", "Membership",
> "Skins", "Types", "Workflow".
I'm curious... do you use these with sites that are not
in any other way based on CMFCore/CMFDefault ?
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:42, Jim Fulton wrote:
The reason that I hate merge messages like this is that I find it
very difficult to find the branch checkin messages in thye log. It's
possible, but so difficult that I generally would rather not
bother.
I agree, but history is
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:23, Jim Fulton wrote:
2. Convert the mainline history, but leave off the branches.
Would this mean we'd lose the log messages too? If so -1 because often
merge messages aren't very helpful. "merged foo-bar-branch to head"
would suck if you couldn't
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:48, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Jim]
> I read some subversion docs over the weekend, and so am sufficiently
> prepared to live with the oddities of "a standard" subversion layout. I
> think that if you make a non-standard layout, then everyone coming to, or
> going from, Zope fr
[Jim]
> The standard subversion repository layout is by project:
>
>proj1
> /trunk
> /branches
> /br1
> /br2
> ...
> /tags
> /tag1
> /tag2
> ...
...
> With this layout, when you w
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:42, Jim Fulton wrote:
> The reason that I hate merge messages like this is that I find it
> very difficult to find the branch checkin messages in thye log. It's
> possible, but so difficult that I generally would rather not
> bother.
I agree, but history is history, so we
Jim Fulton wrote:
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:23, Jim Fulton wrote:
2. Convert the mainline history, but leave off the branches.
Would this mean we'd lose the log messages too?
Yes, you'd lose the branch log messages.
> If so -1 because often
merge messages aren't very h
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:23, Jim Fulton wrote:
2. Convert the mainline history, but leave off the branches.
Would this mean we'd lose the log messages too?
Yes, you'd lose the branch log messages.
> If so -1 because often
merge messages aren't very helpful. "merged foo-bar
The standard subversion repository layout is by project:
proj1
/trunk
/branches
/br1
/br2
...
/tags
/tag1
/tag2
...
proj2
/trunk
/branches
/br1
On Monday 26 April 2004 03:23 pm, Jim Fulton wrote:
> 2. Convert the mainline history, but leave off the branches.
This sounds good to me.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:23, Jim Fulton wrote:
> 2. Convert the mainline history, but leave off the branches.
Would this mean we'd lose the log messages too? If so -1 because often
merge messages aren't very helpful. "merged foo-bar-branch to head"
would suck if you couldn't at least see the log
I'm working on the cvs to subversion conversion for the ZODB, Zope 2, and
Zope 3 projects. I'm currently doing the conversion of the full history with
tags and branches. This is taking a long time and creating a huge
repository, which is OK, but, do we really need that much history?
I see 3 option
Chris Withers wrote at 2004-4-25 18:50 +0100:
>When I click on the Advanced tab of one of my ZSQL Methods, I see this:
>
>Traceback (innermost last):
> ...
>- __traceback_info__: XXdF
> Module ZODB.Connection, line 149, in __getitem__
>- __traceback_info__: ('\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x08dF
Tres Seaver wrote at 2004-4-26 11:46 -0400:
>Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Dieter Maurer wrote:
> ...
>>> We use "SkinsTool", "ActionsTool" and "DCWorkflow" a lot,
>>> "MembershipTool" sometimes and most other tools not at all.
>>
>>
>> Okay, point taken. :)
>>
>> How much do the tools listed in
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote at 2004-4-24 22:49 +0200:
...
In practice right now the picture is 'Use all of the CMF or none of it'.
No, not really...
We use "SkinsTool", "ActionsTool" and "DCWorkflow" a lot,
"MembershipTool" sometimes and most other too
Maik Jablonski wrote:
>
> Sounds cool... I'm not sure if it's easy as you describe, but I hope so...:)
Basically you just grep for URL1 in all dtml files, anywhere you see
&dtml-URL1; or and change it to
IIRC "REQUEST" is safe to use.
The culprit in this case is likely in manage_tabs.dtml
I'v
[Max M, tests a zip file of .pyd files in Zope3, on Windows]
> I finally got around to testing this, and it works *exactly* as I
> hoped. I downloaded Z3 from CVS, and Tim's zip file.
>
> I unpacked the zip file into the Z3 directory, and it started the
> first time.
Yippee! That's what I expecte
Does anyone have the source code to the Addressit
sample program found in the "Zope Bible"? If not all
of it, I'm mainly looking for the Addressit.py file.
Thanks!
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25ยข
h
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote at 2004-4-24 22:49 +0200:
...
In
practice right now the picture is 'Use all of the CMF or none of it'.
No, not really...
We use "SkinsTool", "ActionsTool" and "DCWorkflow" a lot,
"MembershipTool" sometimes and most other tools not at all.
Okay, po
Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 12:48:30PM -0400, Fred Drake wrote:
On Sunday 25 April 2004 12:29 pm, Jim Fulton wrote:
>cvs co svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/Zope3/trunk Zope3
That should be:
svn co svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/Zope3/trunk Zope3
>cvs co http://svn.zope.
On Sunday 25 April 2004 06:57 am, Jim Fulton wrote:
> If we drop the requirement to make the interfaces interoperate (e.g.
> extend one another, or be used in the same declarations), then, with a small change
> that
> Martijn has suggested, we can use zope.interface in Zope 2 without any other cha
You might be interested in a feature-full plugin for Eclipse for developing for
Jython. This seems like a very promising start to me. Maybe we can convince the author
to adapt it to support Python (or CPython if you like) and Zope...
http://home.tiscali.be/redrobin/jython/
___
Jim Fulton wrote:
Historically, we've had Packages, Products, Packages3 and Products3
directories in the CBS repository. I wonder of we need these going
forward. Perhaps we should just have top-level projct directories
in the new subversion repository.
I think having a distinction between Zope 2 an
Bjorn Stabell wrote:
--On Montag, 26. April 2004 10:53 Uhr +0200 David Convent
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I always believed that unicode and utf-8 were same encoding, but
reading you let me think i was wrong.
Can you tell me what the difference is between unicode and utf-8 ?
Andreas Jung wro
> --On Montag, 26. April 2004 10:53 Uhr +0200 David Convent
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I always believed that unicode and utf-8 were same encoding, but
> > reading you let me think i was wrong.
> > Can you tell me what the difference is between unicode and utf-8 ?
Andreas Jung wrote:
>
--On Montag, 26. April 2004 10:53 Uhr +0200 David Convent
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bjorn,
I always believed that unicode and utf-8 were same encoding, but reading
you let me think i was wrong.
Can you tell me what the difference is between unicode and utf-8 ?
Unicode is common database
Hi Bjorn,
I always believed that unicode and utf-8 were same encoding, but reading
you let me think i was wrong.
Can you tell me what the difference is between unicode and utf-8 ?
Bjorn Stabell wrote:
While we're all waiting for Zope 3 and Plone 3, I'd like to know what the
"standard practice"
On Monday 26 April 2004 09:27, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
> While we're all waiting for Zope 3 and Plone 3, I'd like to know what the
> "standard practice" way of using Unicode with Zope 2. In particular, we'd
> like to store all text as Unicode in the ZODB, and have Zope do the
> encoding/decoding as a
Jim Fulton wrote:
[decouple interface implementation]
*falls into a dead faint* *wakes up and starts bouncing around*
*Loud cheering!*
Awesome, thanks, Jim! A good start of my working week, too.
*cough* *regains composure* *ahum*
+1
Regards,
Martijn
While we're all waiting for Zope 3 and Plone 3, I'd like to know what the
"standard practice" way of using Unicode with Zope 2. In particular, we'd
like to store all text as Unicode in the ZODB, and have Zope do the
encoding/decoding as automatically and transparently as possible.
We've been usin
Jamie Heilman wrote:
> Maik Jablonski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> there are two collector-issues related to problems when Zope-Objects get
>> ids like 'content_type' or 'URL1'. I think this problem exists for all
>> names used in the REQUEST-object or general acquisitionable attributes of
>> ObjectManager
43 matches
Mail list logo
