En/na Stephan Richter ha escrit:
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 11:02, Gintautas Miliauskas wrote:
2) In any case, are sources/vocabularies a good way to implement
relationships between objects?
There is an easy-to-use relationship library included in SchoolBell
(http://www.schooltool.org/sch
I tried it again, now I wrote down every step:
I checked out Zope into an empty dir, with TortoiseSVN 1.1.4, Build 2935,
UNICODE
from: svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope3/trunk
Head revision
results are:
<...>
at revision: 29896
Added: 4999 updated:7
reinstalled python (activepython 2.3.5-236)
[Tim Peters]
>> Note that I just upgraded Zope3 to use ZODB 3.4a1, same as the Zope
>> 2.8a2 release made yesterday. I'm not sure how "Zope X3.1" relates to
>> the Zope3 trunk, but I don't see anything that looks like "X3.1" in
>> SVN yet, and whatever X3.1 is should also use ZODB 3.4a1.
[Stepha
On Saturday 02 April 2005 17:43, Tim Peters wrote:
> Note that I just upgraded Zope3 to use ZODB 3.4a1, same as the Zope
> 2.8a2 release made yesterday. I'm not sure how "Zope X3.1" relates to
> the Zope3 trunk, but I don't see anything that looks like "X3.1" in
> SVN yet, and whatever X3.1 is sho
On Sunday 03 April 2005 11:27, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> > I have hard time to filter those messages in thunderbird,
> > because of the To header : ";"
> >
> > could you put "zope3-dev@zope.org" in To ?
>
> I filter those on the List-Subscribe header containing "Wikis".
You have to talk to the zo
On Monday 04 April 2005 14:57, Florian Lindner wrote:
> There is a small typo in the README.txt:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Zope3/src/zope/app/preference $ svn diff README.txt
Fixed in revision 29893.
BTW, you should really get checkin rights. :-)
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics &
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 11:02, Gintautas Miliauskas wrote:
> > 2) In any case, are sources/vocabularies a good way to implement
> > relationships between objects?
>
> There is an easy-to-use relationship library included in SchoolBell
> (http://www.schooltool.org/schoolbell). It is independent
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 16:22, Florian Lindner wrote:
> I you think that is a good idea, I would like (to try) to make the
> modifications at the HomeFolderManager. (as a junior job, practice and as
> well as a little bit giving back for all your help).
Sure. Go ahead.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Ste
Hi Florian
Behalf Of Florian Lindner
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 11:10 PM
> To: zope3-dev@zope.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: [Zope3-Users] page uses foreign
> view: contextchanged
>
> Am Mittwoch, 6. April 2005 17:01 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
> > Hi Florian
> >
> > Be
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote at 2005-4-6 08:47 -0400:
...
Thoughts?
What about the rule "explicit is better than implicit"?
I suggest that this *is* explicit.
If I have:
class Foo:
implements(IFoo)
you are very explicitly saying what the class implements.
The proposed change is to
Am Mittwoch, 6. April 2005 17:01 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
> Hi Florian
>
> Behalf Of Florian Lindner
>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:22 PM
> > To: zope3-users@zope.org
> > Subject: [Zope3-Users] page uses foreign view: context changed
> >
> > Hello,
> > I'vw a viewA on a objectA including a
Hi Florian
Behalf Of Florian Lindner
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:22 PM
> To: zope3-users@zope.org
> Subject: [Zope3-Users] page uses foreign view: context changed
>
> Hello,
> I'vw a viewA on a objectA including a macro:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> A view of objectB uses this macro and inserts
On Apr 6, 2005, at 4:57 AM, Santi Camps wrote:
Hi all,
I'm just beginning to study Zope 3 (helped by the magnificent Philipp
von Weitershausen's book). I'm specially interested in the schema
framework, and how it can be used to implement relationships between
objects (if it can be used that wa
Hello,
I've just started playing with the HomeFolderManager and one idea for a small
enhancement comes into my mind.
I think it would be good to have the option to create homefolders and the
respective assignment automatically upon the first call of getHomeFolder.
(of course all of the followin
Jim Fulton wrote at 2005-4-6 08:47 -0400:
> ...
>Thoughts?
What about the rule "explicit is better than implicit"?
Does it make that much difference whether you specify the interface
explicitly or can omit it based on some elaborate algorithm?
--
Dieter
_
I'm not sure offhand what you're running into. I would say it's
subversion + your system. If I do a clean checkout of Zope3 I can use
bin/mkzopeinstsance to create new instances that work fine.
Was your checkout to an empty directory?
-- Garrett
Adam Groszer wrote:
> OK, here they come:
>
> /b
Done.
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Please put it in the Zope 3 collector http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope3-dev
Florent
jürgen Kartnaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there really nobody willing to do this change or at least comment it ?
Am I completely wrong with this fix ?
Jürgen
jürgen Kartnalle
Hi Adam
Behalf Of Adam Groszer
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 6:35 PM
> To: zope3-users
> Subject: [Zope3-Users] problem with adding a catalog
>
> I'm desperately trying to get Zemantic working on Win2K/Zope3 trunk.
> It is written in the doc of Zemantic that I have to create a Catalog
> util
OK, here they come:
/bin is not copied to \Scripts
-copied by hand
/zopeskel is not copied to \zopeskel
-copied by hand
\zopeskel\etc\securitypolicy.zcml missing
-copied from
\zopeskel\etc\package-includes empty
-copied from /package-includes
\Lib\site-packages\buddydemo\locales dir missing
-
Hello,
> 2) In any case, are sources/vocabularies a good way to implement
> relationships between objects?
There is an easy-to-use relationship library included in SchoolBell
(http://www.schooltool.org/schoolbell). It is independent from other
packages in SchoolBell. You can get a feel of mana
Please put it in the Zope 3 collector http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope3-dev
Florent
jürgen Kartnaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there really nobody willing to do this change or at least comment it ?
>
> Am I completely wrong with this fix ?
>
> Jürgen
>
> jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
> >
Jim Fulton wrote:
> A recent simplification was made to adapter and utility registration.
> When registering adapters, the provided interface can be ommitted
> if the registered factory implements a single interface. Similarly,
> when registering utilities, the provided interface can be ommitted
>
Adam Groszer wrote:
> I'm trying to build & install the Zope 3 trunk on Win2K.
> I'm having some problems with it.
>
> May I post them here or is it too early for the upcoming release?
>
> Adam
>
> ___
> Zope3-dev mailing list
> Zope3-dev@zope.org
> Un
Jim Fulton wrote:
> Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] Form framework, adapters and pau
>
>
> Here's an alternate proposal:
>
> Let's put the proxying in the trusted adapter factory.
>
> Let's make the trusted adapter factory add the proxy
> if the adapter doesn't set ILocation. Then the form code
> stay
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 08:47, Jim Fulton wrote:
Thoughts?
+1.
Also note that not many people use this way yet, since it is (a) not
publicized and documented (only in README.txt) very much and (b) has not been
released yet.
Right, that's why I want to change it now, bef
Dominik Huber wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Here's an alternate proposal:
Let's put the proxying in the trusted adapter factory.
Let's make the trusted adapter factory add the proxy
if the adapter doesn't set ILocation. Then the form code
stays clean and other code will benefit. This would become
part
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 08:47, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Thoughts?
+1.
Also note that not many people use this way yet, since it is (a) not
publicized and documented (only in README.txt) very much and (b) has not been
released yet.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S
A recent simplification was made to adapter and utility registration.
When registering adapters, the provided interface can be ommitted
if the registered factory implements a single interface. Similarly,
when registering utilities, the provided interface can be ommitted
if the registered component
Jim Fulton wrote:
Here's an alternate proposal:
Let's put the proxying in the trusted adapter factory.
Let's make the trusted adapter factory add the proxy
if the adapter doesn't set ILocation. Then the form code
stays clean and other code will benefit. This would become
part of the definition of
Here's an alternate proposal:
Let's put the proxying in the trusted adapter factory.
Let's make the trusted adapter factory add the proxy
if the adapter doesn't set ILocation. Then the form code
stays clean and other code will benefit. This would become
part of the definition of trusted adapters.
I'm trying to build & install the Zope 3 trunk on Win2K.
I'm having some problems with it.
May I post them here or is it too early for the upcoming release?
Adam
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/
Hi all,
I'm just beginning to study Zope 3 (helped by the magnificent Philipp
von Weitershausen's book). I'm specially interested in the schema
framework, and how it can be used to implement relationships between
objects (if it can be used that way).
I know that are proposals to replace voc
Jim Fulton wrote:
My main objection is that it seem too implicit to me.
My objection is that we would be doing something for the adapter
that it should have done for itself. With this change every adapter
that doesn't provide ILocation will get proxied even if the adapter
is actually public.
I'm w
33 matches
Mail list logo
