Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 Repository State

2005-08-01 Thread Jim Fulton
Martijn Faassen wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: Stephan Richter wrote: ... We will also require Python 2.4 for Zope 3.2, so feel free to use new Python features such as decorators. How did we decide this? Shouldn't we follow a proposal-based policy for a change like this? I would favor

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 Repository State

2005-08-01 Thread Jim Fulton
Stephan Richter wrote: On Monday 01 August 2005 07:13, Benji York wrote: Hmm, crazy idea: perhaps we should ask the Zope 2 folks (developers) if they'd be willing to do the work to get to 2.4. Jim asked this weekend on Zope-Dev whether someone would like to work on switching Zope 2's

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 Repository State

2005-07-31 Thread Jim Fulton
Julien Anguenot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benji York wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: I'd liek to hear why testbrowser requires Python 2.4. I haven't tried it on 2.3 yet, but the main thing is the use of decorator syntax. Obviously that wouldn't be hard to back port,

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 Repository State

2005-07-31 Thread Julien Anguenot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: Julien Anguenot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benji York wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: I'd liek to hear why testbrowser requires Python 2.4. I haven't tried it on 2.3 yet, but the main thing is the

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 Repository State

2005-07-31 Thread Jim Fulton
Julien Anguenot wrote: ... I'm working on a proposal to change Zope 2's security system in 2.9, but that will likely be a big job. You mean migration of Zope2 security system to the Zope3 one right ? Specifically, the protection system at this point. See:

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 Repository State

2005-07-30 Thread Jim Fulton
Stephan Richter wrote: ... Trunk check-in policy and development notes: - We are switching to time-based release cycle, which means that all checked in code must be beta quality, if it is to be considered to be in the release. Zope 3.2 wil be released in December, that means we will freeze

RE: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 Repository State

2005-07-30 Thread Roger Ineichen
Hi Jim Behalf Of Jim Fulton Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 1:47 PM To: Stephan Richter Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 Repository State Stephan Richter wrote: ... We will also require Python 2.4 for Zope 3.2, so feel free to use new Python features

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 Repository State

2005-07-30 Thread Jim Fulton
Roger Ineichen wrote: ... Note that this also effects Zope 2. Starting with the next release, the Zope 2 and Zope 3 will be released together. Zope 2.9 will include Zope 3.2. If Zope 3.2 requires Python 2.4, then so will Zope 2.9. Wasn't there a we don't slow down our development because

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 Repository State

2005-07-30 Thread Benji York
Jim Fulton wrote: I'd liek to hear why testbrowser requires Python 2.4. I haven't tried it on 2.3 yet, but the main thing is the use of decorator syntax. Obviously that wouldn't be hard to back port, if a bit uglier. If we decide we want to continue supporting Python 2.3, then I'd want to

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 Repository State

2005-07-30 Thread Julien Anguenot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benji York wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: I'd liek to hear why testbrowser requires Python 2.4. I haven't tried it on 2.3 yet, but the main thing is the use of decorator syntax. Obviously that wouldn't be hard to back port, if a bit uglier.