Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
I don't expect other people for me to fix this for me, but I suggest
that this be noted somewhere where it can be seen, because ZEO is quite
important for us running larger sites.
I would say ZEO is essential for all serious Zope work. I have to admit
to being
Stephan Richter wrote:
I hope it would have sometimes a ? in them, since this is a totally valid
character. also : will be in 90% of the URLs. The idea here is that we want
to support those silly apple URLs.
OK, I guess my point was that there's a perfectly good library function
that does
On Friday 09 December 2005 06:09, Chris Withers wrote:
OK, I guess my point was that there's a perfectly good library function
that does this, and supports marking certain characters (suchs as ':')
as safe if you want them to be, so I'm curious as to why we're growing
our own warts?
Because
On Friday 09 December 2005 04:21, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Christian has an important point here: There was neither a proposal for
the introduction of WSGI features, nor the zope.publisher refactoring
nor the Twisted integration.
WSGI was implemented before we switched back to
On Friday 09 December 2005 06:02, Chris Withers wrote:
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
I don't expect other people for me to fix this for me, but I suggest
that this be noted somewhere where it can be seen, because ZEO is quite
important for us running larger sites.
I would say ZEO is essential
Chris Withers wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
I hope it would have sometimes a ? in them, since this is a
totally valid character. also : will be in 90% of the URLs.
True.
The idea here is that we want to support those silly apple URLs.
Not really sure what that's about. Joke?
OK, I
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 09 December 2005 06:02, Chris Withers wrote:
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
I don't expect other people for me to fix this for me, but I suggest
that this be noted somewhere where it can be seen, because ZEO is quite
important for us running larger sites.
I
On Friday 09 December 2005 04:47, Christian Theune wrote:
I think this is two things: visibility and having more people look at
large projects like the twisted integration. I think Stephan did a great
Job (at least AFAIK he was the one doing the twisted integration,
right?) but I haven't found
On Friday 09 December 2005 04:47, Christian Theune wrote:
At last I think we should try to continue having good documentation in
the code that documents what is happening. This doesn't necessarily have
to be doctests (good if it is) but provide some information for people
who visit the code. I
On Friday 09 December 2005 04:47, Christian Theune wrote:
Additionally I think we should clean up the Zope 3 project area a bit
and try harder to keep it up to date and manageable. This might include
reducing the amount of information to be able to keep it up to date. I'm
willing to put work
On Friday 09 December 2005 04:21, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
I do have a good feeling that the structures that will be provided by
the Zope Foundation will help us (not solve the problem on their own,
but be supportive).
I don't think we neither need the ZF for this nor should we
On Friday 09 December 2005 07:59, Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
SchoolTool does not use ZEO, the installations are quite small, i.e. for
schools with at most 5000 students.
OK. I fail to get your point, though (and I am not trying to be
sarcastic or anything rude here).
All I was saying is
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 09 December 2005 07:59, Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
SchoolTool does not use ZEO, the installations are quite small, i.e. for
schools with at most 5000 students.
OK. I fail to get your point, though (and I am not trying to be
sarcastic or anything rude here).
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:25:48 -0500
From: Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] Twisted Publisher and Zope 2
To: Dario Lopez-K?sten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org \(E-mail\) zope3-dev@zope.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
On Friday 09 December 2005 08:58, Jim Fulton wrote:
A proposal to address this problem is here:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/LocaleSpecificTextCollation
Comments are welcome.
+1 as said on IRC.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D.
Fabrice Monaco wrote:
I think that Z3 framework must have mecanism of load balancing and
clustering,
if in futhur it would like to develop criticals applications. Now if it
would this, the licence if expensif.
Repeat to yourself: Zope 3 is not a load balancer, Zope 3 is not a load
balancer,
Fabrice Monaco wrote:
Also, OQL in Z3 would be a grat step on other technologies.
I'm sure if you provided funding, someone would be happy to to develop
this for you.
If you have no funding to offer, perhaps you could look at developing it
yourself and feeding it back to the Zope
Jim Fulton wrote:
A proposal to address this problem is here:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/LocaleSpecificTextCollation
Comments are welcome.
+1
--
Dmitry Vasiliev (dima at hlabs.spb.ru)
http://hlabs.spb.ru
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
I must perpare the migration of all applications in zope2 to zope3. it is
the moment to decide if I contiue in technology zope3/python or another
technology
example :
or Linux/Apache/Python/Postgress is nice... with Firefox+Xul
or Windows/ASP.net c# http://www.dotnetnuke.com/
I am thus not
Fabrice Monaco wrote:
http://www.zope.com/products/zope_replication_services.html
ZRS provides none of the services you mentioned. It *does*
provide database replication.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Chris Withers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vendredi 9 décembre 2005 15:21
To:
yes, but is necassary for clustering
-Original Message-
From: Jim Fulton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vendredi 9 décembre 2005 15:47
To: Fabrice Monaco
Cc: Chris Withers; zope3-dev@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: Load Balancing
Fabrice Monaco wrote:
Fabrice Monaco wrote:
yes, but is necassary for clustering
That depends on your application.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com
Fabrice Monaco wrote:
I must perpare the migration of all applications in zope2 to zope3. it is
the moment to decide if I contiue in technology zope3/python or another
technology
example :
or Linux/Apache/Python/Postgress is nice... with Firefox+Xul
or Windows/ASP.net c#
Fabrice Monaco wrote:
yes, but is necassary for clustering
No it isn't.
A cluster of ZEO clients can run quite happilly of a storage server, and
you can keep a 1hr-hot backup of the storage server with no need for ZRS.
There's also DirectoryStorage and rsync.
Or you could even have two
24 matches
Mail list logo
