the interfaces.
(See zope.app.component.interface.provideInterface).This function is
called by the directive
handler (See zope.app.component.metaconfigure.interface).
IMO only the therm *provides* is correct in order of the interface
introspection:
IContentType.providedBy(IMyContent)
Re
for creating a LocalSiteManager.
We wrote a little initializer package that should support such usecases.
svn://svn.tiks.org/repos/Tiks/trunk/src/tiks/initializer
- see README.txt for details
If anybody is interested we could extend that package and move it to the
zope 3 repository
Regards
Sakesun Roykiattisak wrote:
So the document does wrong. Let fix it and put my name on the
contributer list... :-D
Done. Thank you for the pointer.
Regards,
Dominik
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listi
serveral direvtives detect their for- and provides-attributes implicitely.
for example:
instead of
Regards,
Dominik Huber
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
only the
component.adapts has influence on the zcml configuration.
Regards,
Dominik
Dominik Huber wrote:
Sakesun Roykiattisak wrote:
component.adapts or __used_for__
Which one is the current preferred method to declare adapter context
interface ?
component.adapts, __used_for__ was just a
tical introduction into
Zope 3. The workshop is hold in german. If anybody is interested
please sign up.
Regards,
Dominik Huber
[1] http://www.zope.ch/ZUGS/minisprints
Original Message
Zope 3-Mini-Sprint: Navigationsfunktionalitäten: Breadcrumbs, Trees etc.
Liebe ZoperInnen
In
Hi James
A few other thoughts...
James Allwyn wrote:
I would appreciate any guidance on what the
recommended Zope3-ish way of handling this would be. I
feel the options are either to create a generic
IProperty object, and subclass it to IHouse,
ICateredHall, ISelfCateredHall, IHomeStay, or
what
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 12 August 2005 04:20, Dominik Huber wrote:
Your question points out the general problematic the implementation
decision between classification and composition. Zope 3 has the power to
reduce an object to its *pure* identity and implement all further
James Allwyn wrote:
Thanks Stephan and Dominik for all the help so far.
I've decided to go down the route Stephan suggested,
since I was more able to get my head around it.
I've got a question about adapters / ZPT:
* Is is possible to access the output of an adapter
directly from ZPT?
Ther
James Allwyn wrote:
used the following to get it to also provide
this as a property:
rating = property(getRating)
Yes, but I would not offer both. I would limit the
interface to the
property only, because the property can used more
easily generating
generic view such as schemadisplay,
Johan Carlsson wrote:
Ok, so far I figured out the following:
1. Resources gets registered as adapters in the Global Site Manager.
2. The adapter is registerd to adapt from the current layer interface
(defaults to IDefaultBrowserLayer) to the Interface interface
(strange, why is that so I wo
Johan Carlsson wrote:
(zope.app.publication.httpfactory.HTTPPublicationRequestFactory ->
zope.app.publication.browser.setDefaultSkin)
Afterward the specific adapters such as views get invoked, because
you register those to a dedicated request interface using the layer
attribute. Attention th
Alec Munro wrote:
I have a content component that has a property that is a dictionary,
the keys of which are objects (content components themselves). The
values are lists of strings. I've tried implementing this a couple
different ways, but each time I restart, the dictionary comes up
empty.
I'v
Tom Dossis wrote:
I have a content component that has a property that is a dictionary,
the keys of which are objects (content components themselves). The
values are lists of strings. I've tried implementing this a couple
different ways, but each time I restart, the dictionary comes up
empty.
Alec Munro wrote:
I've tried it with PersistentDicts and PersistentMappings, and no luck.
It's very odd, I think there must be some fundamental step towards the
use of a mapping in Zope that I'm missing.
The fundamental step to provide persistency is to derive the target
classes from persist
Tom Dossis wrote:
Joshua Burvill wrote:
Hello All,
I am starting to work through Benji Yorks zope3 quickstart document
which I
am enjoying, but I've run into one problem.
http://www.benjiyork.com/quick_start/
It seems the problem is with the line
from zope.formlib import form
In hel
Frank Burkhardt wrote:
Hi,
a short introduction first:
I'm Frank Burkhardt, working at the Max Planck Institute in Germany. My
employer wants a new website to replace the old one (www.cbs.mpg.de - yes,
it looks really really ugly). We chose Zope3 to implement it.
Maybe there will be one or two
Martin Margo wrote:
Hello
Sorry if this was asked before. I did some basic search and couldn't
find anything. I am new to Zope3 myself.
After reading Stephan and Von Weitershausen's book on Zope 3, I begin
building my own web application. My question is :
After my user adds a new custom objec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I would want to be further explained is: When should I call
validateInvariants?
Of course I would call it when I'm creating or editing the object. Then,
frequently, just after an add or edit form.
More: can I then use auto generated forms (by using events after the
raise for? Accutally I'm haveing problems finding the code
that does this because the traceback is Zope 3 cryptic and
I don't have a debugger setup either.
(I was hoping not having to care about the innerworks of the catalog,
but that maybe is too much too hope for ;-)
Johan
Johan Carlsson wrote:
Dominik Huber wrote:
Hi Johan
Your problem is that the catalog is not locatable itself during the
addition of its indexes (-> state within the create and add method),
therefore the location of the indexes cannot be located and the
NotYetError is raised. You can m
Johan Carlsson wrote:
Right after that I do this:
catalog = Catalog()
for index_name, index_attribute, idx_if, attr_call, index_type
in indexes:
idx = index_type(index_attribute, idx_if, attr_call)
catalog[index_name] = idx
tools['catalo
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
--
Dominik Huber
Perse Engineering GmbH
Jurastrasse 9a
CH-5406 Baden
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: ++41 56 534 7730
begin:vcard
fn:Domin
Frank Burkhardt wrote:
Hi,
When I request a non-existing page from a zope3-server,
I get this message:
The page that you are trying to access is not available
Please note the following:
1. You might have misspelled the url
2. You might be trying to access a non-existing page
Frank Burkhardt wrote:
Hi,
when I search using a catalog, I get a list of persistent objects
but maybe there are objects among them, the calling user
doesn't have permissions for.
How do I check, if the current user (the one calling the view
which queries the catalog) is allowed to view an obj
Florian Lindner wrote:
Hello,
I've a string like "zope.app.folder.Folder" and I want to get the class
zope.app.folder.Folder from this string. How can I do that?
It's probably more a python problem that Zope... but I hope you excuse.
another implementation ;)
zope.dottedname.resolve.resolve
Jeff Shell wrote:
I'm writing a small command line tool that uses parts of Zope 3's
component architecture (zope.component, zope.interface, zope.schema),
and just includes those packages and a couple of supporting ones found
in dependencies (zope.i18nmessageid, exceptions, texting). No
zope.app,
Rupert Redington wrote:
if you use trusted adapters you have to declare an additional class or
content directive for the adapter itself.:
regards,
dominik
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/ma
Rupert Redington wrote:
Dominik Huber wrote:
Rupert Redington wrote:
if you use trusted adapters you have to declare an additional class or
content directive for the adapter itself.:
regards,
dominik
Thank you - thats an instafix.
I only added the
Rupert Redington wrote:
I prefer the trusted adapter because they encapslulate the adapter
inside a security proxy. Then the trusted
adapter has full access to the underlying object. That simplifies the
security story very much because you handle it on the adation level. If
you use locatable and
Bernd Dorn wrote:
On 01.05.2006, at 01:55, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 19:34, Bernd Dorn wrote:
component.queryMultiAdapter((bar,baz), IFoo) is not None or False
this way you always get True or False
ok, for this case it is ok
but when you have a class that uses __conf
Klaus Bremer wrote:
You can try to bypass the zope security mechanism by using
'removeSecurityProxy':
from zope.security.proxy import removeSecurityProxy
...
def doTransaction(self):
transaction = removeSecurityProxy(self.context.produceTransaction())
...
If possible it's better to use
ion=u"adsf",
schema=zope.interface.Interface),
Regards,
Dominik
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
--
Dominik Huber
Perse Engineering GmbH
Jurastrasse 9a
CH-5406 Bad
John Maddison wrote:
I've just started playing around with using z3c.layer to create
applications that don't use the ZMI at all. Everything is pretty
simple so far, except for one fairly important step: creating my
initial application object in the ZODB. What methods do people use to
create the
34 matches
Mail list logo
