On Thursday 12 December 2002 10:11 am, tflan wrote: > What you're "missing" is this. My complaint is relatively simple. As I > said, I followed the original uninstall instructions to the letter. They > didn't work. I also said that I am uncomfortable messing with the OS, the > .bat, and the config.sys files. You may well know a lot about Windows and > operating systems. I don't. > > It seems to me pretty obvious that any software mfr that provides "simple" > instructions to load or unload their program from a system should work. . > The second set of instructions that came from ZA included the warning that > "following these instructions may cause operational damage to your system" > or words to that effect. That should be enough to scare anyone. What you're > missing is that not all of us here are computer wizards. We just want the > damn things to work, and we want programs to do what they say they'll do > without aggravation. Along with most others here, I appreciate your help > when problems like this arise. But fooling with OS is well beyond the scope > of the expertise of most of us here, I think. > > TFlan > Right on, TFlan.
What possible viable reason can there be, that a software company would have need to "hide" a component of the product, in an undisclosed place, that the uninstaller does not remove? I know of no valid reason.. My $.02 CAD worth..... :o) Jorgen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
