sip-implementors  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Sip-implementors] Silence Suppression for G711 Jan Bollen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Silence Suppression for G711 jcsunil1
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Silence Suppression for G711 Jan Bollen
• [Sip-implementors] Is it allowed to receive a 488 response without media port?? saravanan.elumalai
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Is it allowed to receive a 488 response without media port?? Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Is it allowed to receive a 488 response without media port?? saravanan.elumalai
• [Sip-implementors] Fw: PAYLOAD TYPE FOR G729 A and G729B sampat patnaik
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] PAYLOAD TYPE FOR G729 A and G729B Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] PAYLOAD TYPE FOR G729 A and G729B sampat patnaik
• [Sip-implementors] One-way speech issue Mohit Soni
• [Sip-implementors] RTCP port in remote SDP Manu Gowdru
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTCP port in remote SDP Gaurav Kumar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTCP port in remote SDP Manu Gowdru
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTCP port in remote SDP Gaurav Kumar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTCP port in remote SDP Manu Gowdru
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Question regarding translation of ISUP redirecting reason to SIP Diversion reason Luis Villars
• [Sip-implementors] SIP:- difference between route and via vipin juneja
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP:- difference between route and via Iñaki Baz Castillo
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP:- difference between route and via Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] Expected response for UPDATE request sent after 200OK of INVITE request Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Expected response for UPDATE request sent after 200OK of INVITE request Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Expected response for UPDATE request sent after 200OK of INVITE request Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Expected response for UPDATE request sent after 200OK of INVITE request Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Expected response for UPDATE request sent after 200OK of INVITE request ankur bansal
• [Sip-implementors] Query on reliable provisional response isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on reliable provisional response Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on reliable provisional response isshed
• [Sip-implementors] CallBack to emergency call Manolis Katsidoniotis
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CallBack to emergency call Despina Kitsou
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CallBack to emergency call Manolis Katsidoniotis
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CallBack to emergency call Richard Barnes
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CallBack to emergency call Manolis Katsidoniotis
• [Sip-implementors] Outgoing REFER but no support for incoming NOTIFY. Kumar, Puneet (Puneet)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Outgoing REFER but no support for incoming NOTIFY. Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Outgoing REFER but no support for incoming NOTIFY. Kumar, Puneet (Puneet)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Outgoing REFER but no support for incoming NOTIFY. Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Outgoing REFER but no support for incoming NOTIFY. Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] call progress response 180 or 183 Jing Jiang
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] call progress response 180 or 183 MONGRAIN Daniel
  • [Sip-implementors] Slides on Implicit SIP Overload Control Yang Hong
• [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer Answer Model isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer Answer Model Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer Answer Model Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer Answer Model isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer Answer Model isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer Answer Model Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer Answer Model Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer Answer Model isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Offer Answer Model Paul Kyzivat
  • [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model Mayank Kamthan
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model Katsidoniotis, Manolis (NSN - US/Irving)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model Gaurav Kumar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model Seshagiri Kondaveti
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model Ozan Terzi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer answer model Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] MSRP Grammar for path attribute VARUN BHATIA
  • [Sip-implementors] MSRP Grammar for path attribute VARUN BHATIA
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] MSRP Grammar for path attribute Tom Uijldert
• [Sip-implementors] Numbering plan clarification Pavan Kumar
• [Sip-implementors] sip device ring back tone Despina Kitsou
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] sip device ring back tone Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] sip device ring back tone Despina Kitsou
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] sip device ring back tone Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] Terminating early dialog with BYE. Pravin Kumar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Terminating early dialog with BYE. Preksha Gupta
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Terminating early dialog with BYE. Jan Bollen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Terminating early dialog with BYE. ankur bansal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Terminating early dialog with BYE. - Email found in subject Johan DE CLERCQ
• [Sip-implementors] RFC 3325: addr-spec with parameters Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 3325: addr-spec with parameters Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 3325: addr-spec with parameters Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 3325: addr-spec with parameters Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 3325: addr-spec with parameters Balint Menyhart
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 3325: addr-spec with parameters Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] SIP Conformance Testing tool. Kumar, Puneet (Puneet)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Conformance Testing tool. Vadivel Subramaniam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Conformance Testing tool. Tarun2 Gupta
• [Sip-implementors] SIP Digitmap help Raghu
• [Sip-implementors] pre condition in conf tag Aditya Kumar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] pre condition in conf tag ankur bansal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] pre condition in conf tag Pavan Kumar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] pre condition in conf tag ankur bansal
• [Sip-implementors] Need suggestion for SIP simulator - Open source Premalatha Rajasekaran
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Need suggestion for SIP simulator - Open source Rob Day
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Need suggestion for SIP simulator - Open source Vineet Menon
• [Sip-implementors] About SIP over TCP Guan Xsun
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About SIP over TCP Thomas Buono
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About SIP over TCP Guan Xsun
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About SIP over TCP Thomas Buono
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About SIP over TCP Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] what are the problems of not removing P-Asserted-Identity Pendyala Syam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] what are the problems of not removing P-Asserted-Identity Rob Day
• [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE sampat patnaik
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE sampat patnaik
  • [Sip-implementors] Fw: SIP ISSUE sampat patnaik
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Fw: SIP ISSUE ankur bansal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Fw: SIP ISSUE sampat patnaik
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Fw: SIP ISSUE ankur bansal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE sampat patnaik
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE sampat patnaik
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP ISSUE sampat patnaik
• [Sip-implementors] Query on 4xx response. Kumar, Puneet (Puneet)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on 4xx response. Balint Menyhart
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on 4xx response. ankur bansal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on 4xx response. Kumar, Puneet (Puneet)
• [Sip-implementors] CANCEL between 302 and ACK satish agrawal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCEL between 302 and ACK Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCEL between 302 and ACK satish agrawal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCEL between 302 and ACK ankur bansal
• [Sip-implementors] About Cancel a Dialog Guan Xsun
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About Cancel a Dialog satish agrawal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About Cancel a Dialog ankur bansal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About Cancel a Dialog Guan Xsun
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About Cancel a Dialog Arun Arora
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About Cancel a Dialog Seshagiri Kondaveti
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About Cancel a Dialog Olle E. Johansson
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About Cancel a Dialog Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About Cancel a Dialog Arun Arora
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About Cancel a Dialog Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] About Cancel a Dialog Arun Arora
• [Sip-implementors] SIP In-Dialog OPTIONS Ping Branch IDs Gio Navarrette
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP In-Dialog OPTIONS Ping Branch IDs Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP In-Dialog OPTIONS Ping Branch IDs Gio Navarrette
• [Sip-implementors] AUTO: Kavitha Subramaniam is out of the office (returning 09/11/2013) Kavitha Subramaniam
• [Sip-implementors] UAC ignoring the incoming responses (100, 180 & 200) when B-Number is changed and keep re-transmitting the INVITE Aman
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] UAC ignoring the incoming responses (100, 180 & 200) when B-Number is changed and keep re-transmitting the INVITE Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] UAC ignoring the incoming responses (100, 180 & 200) when B-Number is changed and keep re-transmitting the INVITE Aman
• [Sip-implementors] Forking scenario handling at UA Endpoint isshed
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Forking scenario handling at UA Endpoint ankur bansal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Forking scenario handling at UA Endpoint isshed
• [Sip-implementors] SRTP SDES key lifetime Olle E. Johansson
• [Sip-implementors] Handling of re-INVITE with unchanged SDP after RTCP Goodbye Paolo Nardi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of re-INVITE with unchanged SDP after RTCP Goodbye Paolo Nardi
• [Sip-implementors] Record-Route with strict routing neil corcoran
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Record-Route with strict routing Brett Tate
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 125, Issue 2 Mahesh Janardhana
• [Sip-implementors] To post to this list Guillermina Illescas Rodriguez
• [Sip-implementors] What if transport=tcp is not mentioned in Contact header of any request/response? Mohit Soni
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] What if transport=tcp is not mentioned in Contact header of any request/response? Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] What if transport=tcp is not mentioned in Contact header of any request/response? Mohit Soni
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] What if transport=tcp is not mentioned in Contact header of any request/response? Brett Tate
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 125, Issue 1 Sakharam Thorat
• [Sip-implementors] Query regarding user=phone in SIP RURI Suraj Singh
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding user=phone in SIP RURI Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding user=phone in SIP RURI Michael Coffee
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding user=phone in SIP RURI Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] SIP security over UDP (DTLS ?) Tim Ruehsen
• [Sip-implementors] rfc4904: tgrp case sensitivity Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] rfc4904: tgrp case sensitivity Hadriel Kaplan
• [Sip-implementors] How should UAC handle a retransmit of a reliable provisional response Jason Harrison
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] How should UAC handle a retransmit of a reliable provisional response Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] Want to build RCS client over a sip stack sachin sharma
• [Sip-implementors] Open-IMS S-CSCF node sending wrong value in Contact header in 200 OK of Subscribe Mangal Singh
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Open-IMS S-CSCF node sending wrong value in Contact header in 200 OK of Subscribe Tarun2 Gupta
• [Sip-implementors] Instant messaging using sip for bb 10 Ashish Gour
• [Sip-implementors] How to implement transcoding in SIP based devices. sakharam.thorat
• [Sip-implementors] media capabilities in ACK ikuzar RABE
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] media capabilities in ACK Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] media capabilities in ACK Tarun2 Gupta
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] media capabilities in ACK ikuzar RABE
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Doubt in SIP (voip tester) Sharma Vikram
• [Sip-implementors] Bulk registrations Anshuman S. Rawat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Bulk registrations Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Bulk registrations Anshuman S. Rawat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Bulk registrations Hadriel Kaplan
• [Sip-implementors] Call-id length ikuzar RABE
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call-id length Joel Gerber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call-id length Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call-id length ikuzar RABE
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call-id length Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Call-id length Jan Bollen
• [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... ikuzar RABE
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Paolo Nardi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Tarun2 Gupta
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... ikuzar RABE
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Joel Gerber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Joel Gerber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Nenad Milidrag
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP flow's route follows SIP flow's route ... Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] Control theorectic approach for mitigating SIP overload Yang Hong
• [Sip-implementors] Need clarification on glare condition w.r.t Session Refresh timer Jagan Mohan
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Need clarification on glare condition w.r.t Session Refresh timer Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] RFC 3966: useless percent encoding Brett Tate
• [Sip-implementors] Query on a specific session timer scenario Tarun2 Gupta
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on a specific session timer scenario Balint Menyhart

• Earlier messages
• Later messages