Ha. The list needs MORE HUMOR. My simple Jedi mind tricks only work on the weak minded.
"These are not the packets we're looking for. You can move along now." I hope to get off these meds soon. On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:06 AM, M. Ranganathan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Burden, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Hold on there pardner..." > > > > > > > > OK, that was a REALLY, REALLY bad pun! (I wish I’d thought of it first!) > > > > > > Whoa Nellie! ( I just hope you don't know anybody by that name). > > > > > > Ok, when a call is placed on hold it is important to understand there are > > several different call hold formats out there. I think it's reasonable to > > assume if your ITSP supports one (should), it would be to place the call > on > > hold as is, using an ip of 0.0.0.0. > > > The ITSP does not see HOLD originating from the pbx. It is handled > locally by sipxbridge. > > The ITSP must be able to handle INVITE(no SDP), OK(sdp), ACK(sdp) on > resume. > > This is possibly the problem. > > > Ranga > > > -- > M. Ranganathan > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
