We’re still a Softimage pipeline, and just like most who are replying, the main reason is for the ease in lighting, rendering, and pass setup. We have an Arnold renderfarm but we are finding ourselves using that less often in favour of Redshift. Houdini is on our radar and we’ve been tinkering with it, and we have a Modo license but haven’t had the time to even install it.
Overall I think that we are still more efficient using Softimage as it is, than we would be switching to a newer workflow, which (without wanting to start that whole discussion again) speaks volumes about the quality of Softimage, bearing in mind that we can assume its development essentially finished 5 years ago! Cheers, Jean-Louis Digital Golem > On 19 Aug 2015, at 12:08, Sandy Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > After a stint out of the Softimage fold - mainly in setting up a Houdini > rendering and VFX pipeline somewhere, and now I am at Axis animation, doing > pipeline tools and setup - I wanted to get a feel for this - > > Who in the world is continuing to use Softimage? Who might still be on the > lookout for high end Soft Riggers, pipeline, tools etc...? > > Just wondering, as I consider the future for myself and family. > > Thanks > > Sandy
