Le 2012-02-11 à 15:30, Cameron Byrne a écrit : > > On Feb 10, 2012 2:20 AM, <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote: > > > > Dear WG members, > > > > I would like to close this document so that we can meet the following item > > from the WG Charter: > > > > " > > 4. Developments for stateless legacy IPv4 carried over IPv6 > > - develop a solution motivation document to be published as an > > RFC > > - develop a protocol specification response to the solution > > motivation document; this work item will not be taken through > > Working Group last call until the solution motivation document > > has been published or approved for publication > > " > > > > Except the a comment asking to include a new section to compare stateful > > vs. stateless, no further comments have been received. > > > > I didn't considered adding the proposed new section because IMO it is out > > of scope of this document. That section can justify in its own a dedicated > > draft. > > > > I find this omission disappointing. There is a common assumption that > stateless is superior to stateful, but it is not quantified anywhere. > > It seems all this stateless work hinges on this assumption without any > quantification. > > Honestly, the omission makes me believe the case of stateless being superior > is dubious. >
Both stateful AND stateless have their use cases. This motivation draft shouldn't be taken as advocating that Stateful should be abandoned! (Both NAT64 and DS-lite are here to stay. There also have their use cases where they are superior). Delaying this document would only be IMHO a waste of energy. Regards, RD > Cb > > > As for the next step, I see two options: > > > > (1) Either issue a WG LC, or > > (2) Withdraw the document and update the WG charter. > > > > WG members, please advise. > > > > Cheers, > > Med > > _______________________________________________ > > Softwires mailing list > > Softwires@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
