On 4/2/12 12:33 PM, Ole Trøan wrote:
the status quo; with no path forward just means that we'll
effectively kill A+P. I would certainly not recommend my product
managers to implement either of this given the risk. is there
consensus to abandon these efforts (which is basically what we do by
publishing them as experimental anyway)?
the alternatives we have are perfectly fine: - Shared IPv4 address
over IPv4 transport -> NAT444 / CGN - Shared IPv4 address over IPv6
transport -> 464XLAT / DS-lite - Full IPv4 address over IPv6
transport -> DS-lite with Public IPv4 address
problem solved. ;-)
So, if we deprecate RFC6346 and with that the whole A+P idea - is that
solving anything? Really?
I'm also really tempted to do that if this community can't decide what
to do in a quick time manner, showing the industry the path forward.
Cheers, Jan Zorz (speaking for myself only)
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
