On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:52:39PM +0000, Wheeler, David A wrote:
> W. Trevor King:
> > I think that would be clearer if, instead of scoping this as “SPDX
> > IDs”, you scoped it as “SPDX License Expression Comments” or some
> > such.
>
> Agreed.  Perhaps call these "SPDX license comments" - since that's
> what they are?

That works for me.

> > Along those lines, I wish the comment tag had been
> > SPDX-License-Expression, but it's too late to adjust that now ;).
>
> I disagree, you could still adjust that over time.

I've spun this out into [1] to avoid getting off-topic here.

[1]: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/issues/82

Cheers,
Trevor

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
Spdx-tech@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech

Reply via email to