On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:52:39PM +0000, Wheeler, David A wrote: > W. Trevor King: > > I think that would be clearer if, instead of scoping this as “SPDX > > IDs”, you scoped it as “SPDX License Expression Comments” or some > > such. > > Agreed. Perhaps call these "SPDX license comments" - since that's > what they are?
That works for me. > > Along those lines, I wish the comment tag had been > > SPDX-License-Expression, but it's too late to adjust that now ;). > > I disagree, you could still adjust that over time. I've spun this out into [1] to avoid getting off-topic here. [1]: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/issues/82 Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spdx-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
