>> It seems the ending of EotB is the only gripe you have with the game,
since
>> you still refer to it as a "great game" (and this despite your having
just
>> named it as worse than LGoP2).
>
>I didn't name it worse than LGoP2, you did.

Correct if I'm mistaken, but I could have sworn you were the one who brought
EotB into the discussion (prompted by my request that you name games worse
than LGoP2).

>If you don't play an RPG or adventure game to finish it, why do you play
it?

Because playing it is *fun*?  Yes, to beat it is one reason, in the sense
that we buy games expecting to eventually finish them, and not to keep
playing them forever.  But do you go into a store and grab a title off the
shelves thinking, "Man, I can't *wait* to see this game's ending after I
experience the thrill of beating it!"  Probably not.  More likely, you're
thinking about the enjoyment you'll have in actually *getting* to that
ending.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list.  To unsubscribe, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to