> However, I have yet to see a plugin follow this guideline. Is this still
I think I wrote that right back in the beginning of TiddlyWiki5, when it
was under development in 2011/12. Trying to learn from the experience of TW
Classic, I was consciously trying to implement features that would help the
As it's turned out, I don't think using the author prefix in the
widget/macro name is a good approach, because of the inevitable wordiness
Tobias' idea of a central registry is not bad; if you're interested in
setting it up, then I suggest that structuring the registry as tiddlers in
the tw5.com wiki, but open to suggestions.
On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 9:24:18 AM UTC+1, Julian Kniephoff wrote:
> Hi Tobias
> that's good to hear in the sense that I now don't have to feel bad for
> ignoring that guideline myself.
> The GitHub-Repository idea sounds very interesting, even independently of
> namespacing issues. But in the long run, some kind of namespace system
> could be very useful. After all, I might really really want to pick a
> certain name for my widget, for example, even if I find out that it is
> already taken. ;)
> Just a stray idea: Since TiddlyWiki borrows XML syntax (for widgets)
> already, anyway, something similar to the XML namespace system could maybe
> I imagine a plugin author would specify a namespace URI (maybe the
> sourceURL that is already in the plugin.info file?) and then to use the
> stuff from the frobnicate plugin, you would specify a namespace attribute
> <$frobnicate twns="http://juliankniephoff.com/frobnicate">
> Every named entity referred to in here is looked up in my plugin first
> Or, if you want to explicitly disambiguate things or be more explicit in
> general, you could give it a prefix:
> <$jk:frobnicate twns:jk="http://juliankniephoff.com/frobnicate">
> Every named entity referred to in here with a "jk:" prefix is looked up in
> my plugin first
> As said, just an idea. Such a system would probably require much work very
> deep within the core of TiddlyWiki. :/
> Best wishes,
> P.S.: Sorry for the empty post earlier, I accidentally hit the wrong
> button ...
> On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 6:25:51 AM UTC+2, Tobias Beer wrote:
>> Hi Julian,
>> It's the first time I hear of this convention and I'm almost certain no
>> one has been adhering to it.
>> At least I haven't been, since I wasn't even aware it existed.
>> It would definitely avoid collisions, especially among plugin authors.
>> If you look at my plugins, you'll find that many have a good chance for
>> future incompatibilities owed to their generic names...
>> Eventually, rather than the above convention, I think we should have some
>> public listing where authors can register some basic info about their
>> plugins, especially things that may clash, like:
>> - parsers
>> - widgets
>> - filters
>> - fields
>> - css classes
>> I find that to be a more sensible approach which would also make plugins
>> a little more discoverable. Then a dev could verify if their desired name
>> was already used by something else.
>> This could be a simple github repo where authors are free to make a PR
>> for their plugin listing.
>> Best wishes,
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.