On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 1:17:44 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > > However, I have yet to see a plugin follow this guideline. Is this still > enforced/encouraged? > > I think I wrote that right back in the beginning of TiddlyWiki5, when it > was under development in 2011/12. Trying to learn from the experience of TW > Classic, I was consciously trying to implement features that would help the > community coalesce. > > As it's turned out, I don't think using the author prefix in the > widget/macro name is a good approach, because of the inevitable wordiness > it brings. >
Should this note be removed from the page then? Should I create an issue and/or pull request for that? Maybe it could even be replaced by (some of) the advice by Mario? > Tobias' idea of a central registry is not bad; if you're interested in > setting it up, then I suggest that structuring the registry as tiddlers in > the tw5.com wiki, but open to suggestions. > A question regarding such a registry that came to my mind is: How does this interact with the plugin library mechanism? I don't know much about that, yet, but I figure there is at least some overlap between its goals and the goals for such a central repository. Maybe some of that stuff can be repurposed and/or integrated. Best wishes, Julian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/b8875b92-7677-4b11-8b19-d4890d550d2a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
