On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 1:17:44 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
> > However, I have yet to see a plugin follow this guideline. Is this still
> I think I wrote that right back in the beginning of TiddlyWiki5, when it
> was under development in 2011/12. Trying to learn from the experience of TW
> Classic, I was consciously trying to implement features that would help the
> community coalesce.
> As it's turned out, I don't think using the author prefix in the
> widget/macro name is a good approach, because of the inevitable wordiness
> it brings.
Should this note be removed from the page then? Should I create an issue
and/or pull request for that? Maybe it could even be replaced by (some of)
the advice by Mario?
> Tobias' idea of a central registry is not bad; if you're interested in
> setting it up, then I suggest that structuring the registry as tiddlers in
> the tw5.com wiki, but open to suggestions.
A question regarding such a registry that came to my mind is: How does this
interact with the plugin library mechanism? I don't know much about that,
yet, but I figure there is at least some overlap between its goals and the
goals for such a central repository. Maybe some of that stuff can be
repurposed and/or integrated.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.