Hi David, On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 2:03:53 AM UTC+2, David Szego wrote: > > I hereby nominate Tobias's excellent ` (backtick) macro and > <<plugin-docs>> macro as the standard by which we should all wrote our > plugin documentation to, and it should be part of the TW core so we can > just include the right pluginname-info / pluginname-syntax etc. Tiddlers > when we package up our plugins. >
Not everything, that is a good fit for one usecase "documenting plugins", is a good fit for the general purpose core. I think it it good as it is: a plugin. ... BUT ... We definitely need to enhance the mechanism, how plugins can be explored and good plugins can be identified! just some thoughts. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/a4be1df9-70fc-4635-8ef4-dcb8a5b04455%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.