*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
On 2/Jan/2011 22:18, Pete McLaughlin wrote:
You owe a very pleasant thank you to anyone that activates the content 
of you reactive mind.  They are giving you a freebie.  When a bully 
kicks sand on you at the beach and you go ballistic in response you know 
from the TROM material that this is a hot game for you.  Timebreak the 
game and your reaction to it until it is completely unimportant to you.
   This is the low hanging fruit, the targets of opportunity of life that
another is serving up to you.  Thank them and timebreak your minds content.

It doesn't matter that others are saying unpleasant things to others or 
to you.  It only matters that you timebreak your reaction and thank them 
for helping you find another hot item.

-------------------------------------------------------

Pete - Thanks for the reminder. However when a vacuum cleaner salesman 
tells me that he is concerned about the dust in my house - I know that 
he is only truly interested in the commission he is hoping to get from 
the sale.

When someone tries to persuade me to their point of view and uses 
ad-hominem tactics -  then I must ask myself whether they want me to see 
their point of view or sympathize with their victim status or are they 
intent on elevating their own status by denigrating others.

I am certainly not completely free of "irateness" or emotion. I have a 
large family who provide a great many opportunities for "time-breaking" 
LOL or resolve by applying that first datum in TROM of doing consciously 
what the reactive is doing subconsciously.

I don't think its too much to expect that those studying TROM actually 
study in a new unit of time and if they don't agree with something or 
can't understand some aspect they should ask for clarification on the list.

To allow anyone to assume some altitude of "I am better" or have greater 
knowledge and therefor consider TROM or Dennis or whoever as beneath 
them is not conducive to enlightenment or elucidation and they should 
not be allowed to use this list to forward some hidden agenda.

Having concern for an adversary would include realizing the intent of 
the adversary and indicating that his intent was not as hidden as he 
supposedly thought.

Most are on this list to gain insight and enlightenment. Over the years 
we have had isolated posters who had other agenda's. They were more 
detractive than destructive and fell by the wayside. They did succeed 
for a while in distracting from the purpose of the list.

The criticism that TROM is difficult to understand may have some 
validity as Dennis used an approach based on "logic" which is eschewed 
by Hubbard in Scientology - He promoted the use of "illogics" to 
identify "out-points" as he referred to them.

After studying TROM - the latter day "illogics" of Scientology become 
glaringly obvious. The early tech remains valid. By early tech I mean 
the tech which was developed for individual enhancement and not for 
group collective power.

I do understand the problem ex-scientologists have with TROM. Been there 
done that. The statement "Been there done that" and my criticism of 
latter day Scientology is in itself a statement of altitude for which I 
apologize. I am more than willing to give detail should anyone ask.

Martin












_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to