************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Thanks, Pete, Jan.7/11
This is good; I'll have to let that sink in for awhile. Aarre Peltomaa On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Pete McLaughlin < [email protected]> wrote: > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > > Hi Aarre > My point is that you will only see muggers beating up old ladies if you > have a compulsion to interfere as the hero in the situation. > > To play the game or not play the game is the question? > > If you realize that it is a game you have a compulsion to see and take a > role in then i have made my point. Weather you take the role or not is up > to you. > > All the arguments as to why you should take action are only justifications > you create to do what your reactive mind is compelling you to do. You are a > very creative individual so i won't try to convince you that you should not > take action. > > hope that helps. > > Sincerely, > > Pete > > --- On *Thu, 1/6/11, Aarre Peltomaa <[email protected]>* wrote: > > > From: Aarre Peltomaa <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [TROM1] Opportunities to time-break > To: [email protected], "The Resolution of Mind list" < > [email protected]> > Date: Thursday, January 6, 2011, 7:51 PM > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by > [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> > ************ > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Aarre Peltomaa > <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> > > wrote: > > Hi Martin, Jan. 6/11 > > I love your evaluation. One thing I still haven't resolved though. Can > you elucidate to me what I should do if I see a mugger beating up an old > lady to steal her money, or worse yet, just for the thrills. I know that > she is motivating and postulated it, and so forth, but it's still wrong for > him to do this, and for her to 'receive' this. If it's life threatening to > her, should I go over and knock his bloody lights to kingdom come? Surely I > can't just allow it to happen, otherwise haven't I commited a contrasurvival > action of omission 'overt'? This is a very wide encompassing philosophical > point I've wondered upon for a long time. > Thanks, Aarre Peltomaa > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Pete McLaughlin > <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > >
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
