Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus of the Bible

[Blainerb473]

In a message dated 7/6/2005 4:30:58 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I believe the BoM has original Christianity as it was taught by the Lord himself. Other than you have been taught this, what hard evidence do you have of such teachings?   Blaine:  All truth may be determined by scientific approach--do you believe this?  Joseph Smith says he prayed and had his prayers answered.  This can be tested, by repeating as closely as possible, his original investigative experiment.  Pray, and if your prayers are answered, you have the answer to your question.  The BoM came about as an answer to prayer.  Is there any harder evidence than this?  (I have checked this out many times, and my prayers were answered in the due time of the Lord in one way or other.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 7/4/2005 11:01:34 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Blaine wrote: > If the bible is not a perfect instrument, then the > BoM or a similar book revealed from heaven > must be needed. Point well taken that we consider the Bible "perfect," but it appears now that you have just said that the BOM is needed because the Bible is not perfect.  Is this what you believe? Peace be with you. David Miller. Blaine:  Hmmm, I have a feeling whatever I say will be used against me.  LOL  But, yes, I believe the BoM was needed to set things straight.  I think the Bible is the word of God as far as it is translated correctly, and as far as the writers had things straight in the first place.  The BoM however, has it straight, I think, as it was supposed to be, or meant to be. IOW,  I believe the BoM has original Christianity as it was taught by the Lord himself.