On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Maybe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 27, 7:10�am, Bob in Jersey <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The now 40-something woman, whom Roman Polanski pleaded guilty to have
>> had sex with as a teen in the 70s, even wants for this long debacle to
>> be over -- she reached an undisclosed money settlement with the self-
>> exiled director,
>
> So you're saying that if the victim forgives the criminal and takes
> money from him, then the criminal should be let out of jail or not
> even arrested in the first place?
>
> Maybe...hummm...

I doubt anyone is saying that. But if you are familiar with the
details of the case you know that it is not at all clear that Polanski
knew, or reasonably should have known, that she was underage, that he
settled a civil suit with her years ago, and that she has said that
the only part of this incident that continues to cause her and her
family any pain is that the incompetent and unethical handling of it
by the DA and judge have prevented her from putting it completely
behind her.

I would never dream of defending Polanski's habit at the time of
promiscuous sex with young (but over 17) girls, often with alcohol and
drugs involved. I knew a lot of girls in those days who were involved
in that scene, and it was not good. But it is very clear that with any
kind of decent judge and DA, this case would have been satisfactorily
resolved several decades ago.

If Polanski had been willing to take a chance, the case most likely
would have been resolved a long time ago satisfactorily anyway, but he
(perhaps understandably) has never been able to trust the LA legal
system.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to