On Oct 1, 8:53 am, Chris Neuman <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd agree with this if Polanski had been treated by the courts the same way > "we" might have been. Instead, he came up against a judge who had delusions > of Hollywood grandeur, who choreographed both the DA and the defense > attorney from the bench, who went back on a deal that saw Polanski serve > time on a psych assessment in lieu of prison -- in short, the kind of > situation that would normally get you riled up and castigating the system. > Say what you will about what he did -- and there's not much that he did tha > a reasonable person could be happy about -- but there was a reason, other > than "I'm a celebrity, get me out of here," that he ran.
Something tells me that if "we" had drugged and raped a 13-year-old, "we" would have done more time than 6 weeks of psychiatric observation and "time served." I hope the bastard rots in jail. --Dave Sikula --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
