The rev-share doesn't kill the deal for me, although it does feel steep, and just because Apple gets 30% for the app store, not sure that number works in all cases. Also 60 day terms are discouraging. But the killer for me is the support-only clause. If I can't own the relationship, that makes it a total no-go.
On Sep 27, 4:14 pm, "Jim Renkel" <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree! > > Jim Renkel > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dossy > Shiobara > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 14:08 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [twitter-dev] Re: About the oneforty application directory > > Frankly, I don't even like the idea of read-access for an application > like this. > > It would be nice if Twitter made "authentication only" as an option for > OAuth. Better would be an option on the accept/deny OAuth page where > users can select what access to grant to an application - defaulting to > perhaps what access the application desires. > > On 9/25/09 8:04 PM, Jim Renkel wrote: > > What will you be using my twitter account for, other than > authorization? > > If you reregister the site to only need read access to my twitter > > account, I would be a lot less reluctant to use it. > > -- > Dossy Shiobara | [email protected] |http://dossy.org/ > Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ > "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own > folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
