you're cute and knowledgeable - a great combination!


On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Felmon Davis <dav...@union.edu> wrote:

On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, anne-ology wrote:
>
>        very interesting, yes indeed  ;-)
>>
>>       well, the more I read this list, 'the more I seem to learn, yet the
>> stupider I feel'  ;-)
>>               (the glorified typewriter has so surpassed me)
>>
>>       I note you've used a 'new' word; acronymonious seems to fit well in
>> this saga -
>>           yet I hope you didn't mis-type acrimonious  ;-)
>>               (oh, surely not)
>>
>
> I did not mistype. I went neologistic on you.
>
> F.
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Felmon Davis <dav...@union.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, anne-ology wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>        yikes, sounds as if I need further information -
>>>
>>>>           or need to keep studying ... ... ...  ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> not sure how the further discussion would be relevant to you if you just
>>> want to use the tool. the link I gave you explains the things pdftk can
>>> do.
>>> you can then decide if it might be useful.
>>>
>>> the next step is to determine if you find it convenient to use.
>>>
>>> of course, if you are also interested in how the tool is built, then
>>> that's a different matter.
>>>
>>>
>>>        Please update re. this / these tks whenever; I'll stay tuned  ;-)
>>>
>>>>
>>>>       Ah, acronyms  ;-)
>>>>           tk := 
>>>> http://www.acronymfinder.com/****TK.html<http://www.acronymfinder.com/**TK.html>
>>>> <http://www.**acronymfinder.com/TK.html<http://www.acronymfinder.com/TK.html>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>       (well, while waiting to understand all this, my mind tends to
>>>> wander
>>>> - puns are so much fun  :-)  )
>>>>
>>>>
>>> don't mean to be acronymonious about it but all disciplines and
>>> occupations use abbreviations and have specialist dictionaries -
>>> general-purpose dictionaries won't do.
>>>
>>> F.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Felmon Davis <dav...@union.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Girvin Herr wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>  Felmon,
>>>>>
>>>>>  Looks like pdftk is written in Java.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/******Pdftk<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/****Pdftk>
>>>>>> <https://en.**wikipedia.org/wiki/**Pdftk<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Pdftk>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.**org/**wiki/Pdftk<https://en.**
>>>>>> wikipedia.org/wiki/Pdftk <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pdftk>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the gui (Graphical User Interface) is whatever the Java Runtime
>>>>>> Environment (JRE) interfaces with.  From my experience, it isn't
>>>>>> pretty,
>>>>>> but functional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I noticed there are some other source files and some 3rd-party code in
>>>>>> the package that I did not take time to investigate, and it takes Gcc
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> build it.  But one of the big ideas of Java is that it contains its
>>>>>> own
>>>>>> gui
>>>>>> code, so the programmer's effort is greatly reduced.  I would be
>>>>>> surprised
>>>>>> if pdftk does not use the standard Java gui.
>>>>>> Girvin Herr
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  good to know, especially about the '3rd-party code'.
>>>>>
>>>>> makes sense the gui would be in java so it can run on various
>>>>> platforms.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't however foresee myself invoking the gui unless I'm working off
>>>>> of
>>>>> Windows or something.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll look but I bet there's a command-line version for Windows too.
>>>>>
>>>>> F.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  On 04/13/2013 11:24 PM, Felmon Davis wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Sat, 13 Apr 2013, Tom Davies wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I'm only familiar with pdftk as a command-line tool; thus I was
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> confused
>>>>>>> by the discussion of desktop environments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it does have a gui interface (or several?) and then there are the
>>>>>>> Windows and Mac versions. I don't know what is used to make the gui
>>>>>>> interface on Linux.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Felmon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to