> > > if you make another attempt to convince the moderators to implement > > some measures to address this issue you can count on my support. > > ???? Sorry, what do you mean, "another attempt"? What do you think > this is?
Marco, Your initial proposal was as twofold: 1) you asked the moderators to reject messages [quote]without a decent subject[/quote] explaining the reason why messages were rejected. 2) you asked the volunteeres to stop replying to messages without a decent subject. My understanding is that both proposals received some pushback from the one or the other volunteer, hence my suggestion for a further attempt. Without reading the thread in detail it seems that some consensus exist on a) replying to messages changing the subject to something meaningful when needed b) notify people who post messages without subject that they need to insert one. Now, it seems to me we have two options (mutually exclusive): 1. ask the moderators to reject the messages without subject providing the standard reply explaining the reason for the rejection. 2. have a gentlemen agreement among the volunteers that when replying to messages with no subject, it should be changed to something meaningful So Marco, what is your preferred approach? As already stated, I will support you if you make a proposal in either direction (my preference is option 1, using option 2 not for empty subject messages that will no longer exist but for not so good subjects). Cheers, Michele
