> > > > How about if a mailbox called SPAM exists, put it there, otherwise just > > drop it in the INBOX? > > That sounds nice and clean. I like it. > > Ken Jones If you implement this, please do not remove the ability to simply have the message tagged and then be able to pass it to procmail or maildrop. I'd love to leverage built in spamassassin support, however if you're going to force me into using a folder called spam, then it becomes useless to me. I'm unconvinced this is logic which even remotely belongs in vdelivermail, however obviously a lot of people are worried about the supposed overhead of launching procmail and having to generate procmailrc files. Thanks, Nick Harring Sr System Administrator Webley Systems
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Tom
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Dave Goodrich
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Ken Jones
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Bill Wichers
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configura... Tom Collins
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin confi... Dave Goodrich
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin confi... Bill Wichers
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin confi... Ken Jones
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Ken Jones
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Charles Sprickman
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Nick Harring
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Dave Goodrich
- RE: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Nick Harring
- RE: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Bill Wichers
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Ken Jones
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Bill Wichers
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Tom Collins
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Rick Macdougall
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Tom Collins
- Re: [vchkpw] Spamassin configura... Rick Macdougall
- RE: [vchkpw] Spamassin configuration Charles J. Boening