Jed,
Get real, the proof is in the flow rates and the temperature delta.
That is all that is required.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 12:51 PM 5/16/2016, you wrote:
Robert Dorr <<mailto:rod...@comcast.net>rod...@comcast.net> wrote:
Jed,
Heat is heat. It makes no difference if the heat (water/steam) was
used to make chemicals or whether it was used to heat the air in the
room next door.
Robert, for goodness sake, get real! If they were only releasing the
heat in the air in the next room, you still need proof of that. You
need to see the ventilation equipment. Anyone making a serious
evaluation of this claim cannot simply take it for granted that some
mysterious entity in the next room is getting and using an
extraordinary amount of process heat -- enough to run a factory.
That claim by itself is preposterous. It is, as I said, prima facie
evidence of fraud.
In 6,500 sq. ft?!? Have you seen industrial equipment that uses this
much process heat?
Do you really think anyone would pay $89 million without confirming
every aspect of this claim, by every possible means? What kind of
insane person would accept this claim without seeing the equipment
next door; without talking with the dozens of people operating that
equipment day and night; and without examining whatever industrial
product they are producing by the ton? You need to confirm that X
tons of Widgets per week really does call for a steady stream of 1
MW of process heat.
This is an elementary step in the verification of the claim, at the
most basic level.
- Jed
