Didn't Gamberale change the instrumentation in the DGT test that DGT put back?
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Doctoring of the instrumentation connected to the reactor under test >> could have been done by either party. The only way to verify valid >> instrumentation performance is through sealing it and getting post test >> calibration performed by the manufacture. >> > > That is nonsense. You can verify the instrumentation in 10 minutes using a > hand-held thermocouple, a bucket and a weight scale. I have done that many > times. It is a piece of cake. > > When I said I would do that with Rossi's original tests he immediately > uninvited me. When I said I would do that at Defkalion, they immediately > uninvited me. A pattern emerges . . . When Gamberale finally did that > later, he immediately saw that the flowmeter was set up incorrectly and the > test results were wrong. There was no excess heat. > > - Jed > >
