Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: Didn't Gamberale change the instrumentation in the DGT test that DGT put > back? >
First he put instrumentation in. Then they took it out. Finally, he measured the flow rate with a bucket and weight scale. Which he should have done months earlier. This is what I told Defkalion I would do the moment I arrived. That is why they cancelled my trip. I am sure it is also why Rossi canceled my trip. These people do not want anyone confirming their claims by industry-standard methods. That is one of the reasons you should not trust them. This is the industry standard method. It is described in Florida statutes for boiler testing. If you are a licensed HVAC engineer, and you fail to do this, they will take away your license. Gamberale tried various other methods to confirm the measurements. He was thwarted by Defkalion at every stage. Here is what he wrote: During the setup of the laboratory in Milan various improvements were > introduced by the DE technicians and scientists concerning the calorimetry > measurement. In particular a method independent of the flow rate > measurement has been developed based on the heating of a large amount of > water contained in a large tank and circulated through a pump in a closed > circuit. This measure is independent of the measurement of the flow through > the coil and it would remove any doubt about the heat measurement. DGT did > not allow DE to use such measurement in any of the tests of their > technology. As a further improvement we added a second flowmeter upstream > of the water system in order to verify the behavior of the main flowmeter > during the measurement of the excess power but also in this case the added > flowmeter was readily removed by the DGT technicians forbidding us to make > any verification. The report goes on to say they reproduced the problem with backflow. It does not say they went ahead and measured the flow with a bucket, but I believe he told me they did. He describes how they reproduced the problem in a footnote: In the tests carried out by DE [Gambarale et al.], also the DE scientists, > once they understood the oscillation mechanism, were able to obtain a > measure of (overestimated) heat produced for a period of time of about one > hour a few times greater than the electrical energy input, irrespective of > the presence of the powder inside the reactor and of the type of gas used > (H2 or Ar). - Jed
