Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: An power output of 3 KW would still meet the licence requirements. >
The input was ~20 kW. Do you mean a power output of 23 kW would satisfy the requirements? I am sure that if I.H. had measured 23 kW with confidence, and Rossi had transferred the IP, they would have paid the $89 million. They said they were not that concerned about the letter of the contract. They just wanted to see proof of excess heat. Unfortunately, a careful measurement of the heat balance showed there was no excess heat. Not even 3 kW. 23 kW of output with 20 kW input would not measurably change the room temperature, but you could measure it with proper calorimetry. - Jed
