Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
you can now prove that you have good sources of information;
> can you please explain Item 49 from the Miami Court pacermaker
> explaining us what has Cherokee et al withdrawn and especially WHY?
I know nothing about laws or lawsuits, and I have not read this document.
You should ask a lawyer. Perhaps Jones Beene can enlighten us.
> Is this an "elastic" withdrawal?
If it is "without prejudice" that means it can be re-introduced. See: