An power output of 3 KW would still meet the licence requirements. Can't you understand that power level is not required? Your arguments are classic red herring propaganda.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > The is no power requirement defined in the licence agreement. As long as >> the steam temperature is 100C and the COP is greater than 4, then >> requirements are meet. >> > > A COP of 4 would mean the output is 80 kW. The room would be quite warm if > there were this much heat. It was not warm. > > Also, the people from I.H. were able to do proper calorimetry, and they > confirmed there was no excess heat. > > If the COP were 4, and Rossi had given I.H. the intellectual property the > way he was contractually obligated to do, I.H. would have happily paid > Rossi $89 million, and we would not be having this conversation. > > - Jed > >
