So, you're saying that Jed Rothwell is wrong when he has stated repeatedly that he has never caught Rossi lying about his work? That's really the basis of everything Rothwell is claiming: Although Rossi lies about all sorts of other things, we can trust what he says about his "science".
In other words, you're saying that Rossi lies about *everything* and we should just believe him anyway. That's nothing even remotely like the scientific method. That's called "blind faith". ________________________________ From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 2:45 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ni-64 enrichment From: John Milstone * I have yet to hear of any enrichment method that is within several orders of magnitude of what Rossi *must* have, if he's really selling 100g of "fuel" for $10. Then why even attempt to believe it? Yes that one is absolutely false beyond any reasonable doubt - and yes Rossi often lies, and yes we are left to sort through a mountain of lies to find glimmers of truth on almost every point.
